Pd Control of robot with velocity estimation and uncertainties compensation

Normal industrial PD control of Robot has two drawbacks: it needs joint velocity sensors, and it cannot guarantee zero steady-state error. In this paper we make two modifications to overcome these problems. High-gain observer is applied to estimate the joint velocities, and an RBF neural network is used to compensate gravity and friction. We give a new proof for high-gain observer, which explains a direct relation between observer gain and observer error. Based on Lyapunov-like analysis, we also prove the stability of the closed-loop system if the weights of RBF neural networks have certain learning rules and the observer is fast enough.

[1]  F. Lewis,et al.  Guest editorial: Neural network feedback control with guaranteed stability , 1998 .

[2]  Xiaoou Li,et al.  Some new results on system identification with dynamic neural networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[3]  Carlos Canudas de Wit,et al.  Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedback , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Ali Saberi,et al.  Quadratic-type Lyapunov functions for singularly perturbed systems , 1981, 1981 20th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[5]  Carlos Canudas de Wit,et al.  Sliding observers for robot manipulators , 1991, Autom..

[6]  C. C. Wit,et al.  Adaptive control of robot manipulators via velocity estimated feedback , 1992 .

[7]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Neural network output feedback control of robot manipulators , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  On characterizations of the input-to-state stability property , 1995 .

[9]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Robot dynamics and control , 1989 .

[10]  Chien Chern Cheah,et al.  Adaptive SP-D control of a robotic manipulator in the presence of modeling error in a gravity regressor matrix: theory and experiment , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  A. Tornambè,et al.  High-gain observers in the state and estimation of robots having elastic joints , 1989 .

[12]  Rafael Kelly,et al.  Global asymptotic stability of the PD control with computed feedforward in closed loop with robot manipulators , 1999 .

[13]  Rafael Kelly,et al.  A tuning procedure for stable PID control of robot manipulators , 1995, Robotica.

[14]  Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  A passivity approach to controller-observer design for robots , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[15]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[16]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[17]  A. Isidori,et al.  Passivity, feedback equivalence, and the global stabilization of minimum phase nonlinear systems , 1991 .

[18]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Adaptive motion control of rigid robots: a tutorial , 1988, Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[19]  Patrizio Tomei,et al.  Adaptive PD controller for robot manipulators , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[20]  Suguru Arimoto,et al.  A New Feedback Method for Dynamic Control of Manipulators , 1981 .

[21]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Adaptive motion control of rigid robots: a tutorial , 1988, Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[22]  Alexander S. Poznyak,et al.  Neural adaptive control of two-link manipulator with sliding mode compensation , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[23]  Suguru Arimoto,et al.  Fundamental problems of robot control: Part I, Innovations in the realm of robot servo-loops , 1995, Robotica.

[24]  R. Kelly.  Global positioning of robot manipulators via PD control plus a class of nonlinear integral actions , 1998, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..