Gossip in Organizations

Three hypotheses about the effects of different informal social network structures on gossip behavior are developed and tested. Gossip is defined as a conversation about a third person who is not participating in the conversation. Having analyzed the costs and benefits of gossip, we prefer the coalition hypothesis.~It states that gossip will flourish in social networks that have a relatively large number of coalition triads, that is ego and alter having a good relationship amongst themselves and both having a bad relationship with tertius, the object of gossip. Two rivalling hypotheses are developed. The constraint hypothesis predicts that the inclination towards gossip is greater, the larger the number of structural holes in the personal network of the gossipmonger.~The closure hypothesis predicts that more gossip will be found in networks with a large number of closed triads, that is where both gossipmonger and listener have a good relationship with the absent third person. The hypotheses are tested using a newly developed instrument to measure gossip behavior and network data from six work organizations and six school classes. The data support the coalition hypothesis and do not support the two rivalling hypotheses.

[1]  T. Caplow.  Rumors in War , 1947 .

[2]  Grant Michelson,et al.  Rumour and gossip in organisations: a conceptual study , 2000 .

[3]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[4]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[5]  J. Barkow.  Beneath new culture is old psychology: Gossip and social stratification. , 1992 .

[6]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm , 1994 .

[7]  James H. R. Tucker.  Everyday forms of employee resistance , 1993 .

[8]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[9]  Cas Wouters,et al.  The Established and the Outsiders , 1994 .

[10]  Marie-Odile Lebeaux,et al.  Capital social et contrainte latérale , 1995 .

[11]  G. Bonazzi.  Scapegoating in Complex Organizations: The Results of a Comparative Study of Symbolic Blame-Giving in Italian and French Public Administration , 1983 .

[12]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group , 1998 .

[13]  L. Hubert.  Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis , 1986 .

[14]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Horizons of Observability and Limits of Informal Control in Organizations , 1983 .

[15]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  S. Robinson.  Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract , 1996 .

[17]  R. Burt,et al.  Trust and third-party gossip. , 1996 .

[18]  Diego Gambetta.  Godfather's gossip , 1994, European Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  A STUDY OF THE GRAPEVINE IN A GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION , 1968 .

[20]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Gossip and The Marketplace Psychology. , 1977 .

[21]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[22]  R. Paine.  What is Gossip About? An Alternative Hypothesis , 1967 .

[23]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Donna Eder,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF GOSSIP: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ON COLLECTIVE EXPRESSION AMONG ADOLESCENTS* , 1991 .

[26]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[27]  R. Burt,et al.  Kinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust , 1995 .

[28]  Gwenn W. Gröndal,et al.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1993 .

[29]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach , 1999 .

[30]  C. Morrill.  The Executive Way: Conflict Management in Corporations , 1995 .

[31]  Henk T. Hangyi,et al.  Social Capital, Third Party Gossip, and Cooperation in Organizations , 2000 .

[32]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Andrew Arno,et al.  Fijian Gossip as Adjudication: A Communication Model of Informal Social Control , 1980, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[34]  Diego Gambetta.  Trust : making and breaking cooperative relations , 1992 .

[35]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  News From Behind My Hand: Gossip in Organizations , 1993 .

[36]  Yiannis Gabriel.  The Unmanaged Organization: Stories, Fantasies and Subjectivity , 1995 .

[37]  O. Nevo,et al.  The Development of the Tendency to Gossip Questionnaire: Construct and Concurrent Validation for a Sample of Israeli College Students , 1993 .

[38]  R. Bies,et al.  Beyond distrust: "Getting even" and the need for revenge. , 1996 .

[39]  Mike Doyle,et al.  Mixed Results, Lousy Process: the Management Experience of Organizational Change , 2000 .

[40]  D. Collard,et al.  Trust : making and breaking cooperative relations , 1989 .

[41]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[42]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language , 1996 .

[43]  R. Bennett,et al.  A TYPOLOGY OF DEVIANT WORKPLACE BEHAVIORS: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING STUDY , 1995 .

[44]  D. Wilson,et al.  Gossip and other aspects of language as group-level adaptations , 2000 .

[45]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. , 1996 .

[46]  M. Brewer.  The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[47]  S. Rasmussen.  Modes of persuasion: gossip, song, and divination in Tuareg conflict resolution , 1991 .

[48]  Jon M. Werner,et al.  Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior , 1998 .

[49]  E. Lazega,et al.  Spreading and Shifting Costs of Lateral Control Among Peers: A Structural Analysis at the Individual Level , 2000 .

[50]  D. Krackhardt.  Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations , 1994 .

[51]  M. Gluckman,et al.  Papers in Honor of Melville J. Herskovits: Gossip and Scandal , 1963, Current Anthropology.

[52]  Emmanuel Lazéga,et al.  Acteurs, cibles et leviers: analyse factorielle des relations de controle indirect dans une firme americaine d'avocats d'affaires , 1992 .

[53]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The Social Relations Model , 1984 .

[54]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[55]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[56]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Advice, Trust, and Gossip Among Artificial Agents , 2000 .

[57]  Fred Luthans,et al.  The Use of Dyadic Alliances in Informal Organization: An Ethnographic Study , 1991 .

[58]  David Krackardt,et al.  QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness , 1987 .

[59]  Donald F. Roy.  “Banana Time” Job Satisfaction and Informal Interaction , 1959 .

[60]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[61]  M. Gluckman,et al.  Psychological, Sociological and Anthropological Explanations of Witchcraft and Gossip: A Clarification , 1968 .

[62]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A model for triadic relations. , 1997 .

[63]  M. Marchington,et al.  `Look Before You Speak': Gossip and the Insecure Workplace' , 1997 .

[64]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[65]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[66]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[67]  Nicholas Emler,et al.  Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. , 1994 .

[68]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[69]  J. S. Baker,et al.  The poison grapevine: How destructive are gossip and rumor in the workplace? , 1996 .

[70]  R. L. Rosnow,et al.  Gossip, gossipers, gossipees. , 1994 .

[71]  D. Marlowe,et al.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. , 1960, Journal of consulting psychology.

[72]  David D. Gilmore,et al.  Varieties of Gossip in a Spanish Rural Community1 , 1978 .

[73]  D. Handelman.  Gossip in Encounters: The Transmission of Information in a Bounded Social Setting , 1973 .

[74]  J. Soeters.  Roddel in organisaties , 1994 .

[75]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  POTENTIAL POWER AND POWER USE: AN INVESTIGATION OF STRUCTURE AND BEHAVIOR , 1993 .

[76]  Jack Levin,et al.  An exploratory analysis of sex differences in gossip , 1985 .

[77]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[78]  Charis M. Cussins.  Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language , 1998 .

[79]  H. Holliday,et al.  Gossip in same-gender and cross-gender friends' conversations , 1995 .

[80]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Building Commitment, Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justice , 1995 .

[81]  N. Lin.  Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[82]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange , 1997 .

[83]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[84]  Volker Sommer,et al.  Kratze einen Altruisten. [Review of: Robin Dunbar (1998). Klatsch und Tratsch. Wie der Mensch zur Sprache fand. Munich: C. Bertelsmann. Original: Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. London: Faber & Faber, 1996.] , 1997 .

[85]  R. Nelson.  THE STRENGTH OF STRONG TIES: SOCIAL NETWORKS AND INTERGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1989 .

[86]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[87]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[88]  J. Hackman.  Group influences on individuals in organizations. , 1992 .

[89]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[90]  Sally Engle Merry,et al.  Rethinking Gossip and Scandal , 1984 .

[91]  Darío Páez,et al.  The ‘Black Sheep Effect’: Social Categorization, Rejection of Ingroup Deviates, and Perception of Group Variability , 1994 .

[92]  Mary L. Northway.  A primer of sociometry , 1952 .

[93]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Gossip as Social Comparison , 1977 .

[94]  John Bednarz,et al.  Discreet Indiscretions: The Social Organization of Gossip , 1993 .

[95]  Nancy B. Kurland,et al.  Passing the Word: Toward a Model of Gossip and Power in the Workplace , 2000 .

[96]  Stephan Schrader.  Gaining advantage by ‘leaking’ information: Informal information trading , 1995 .

[97]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Gossip, Gossipers, Gossiping , 1978 .