Complexity of finding Pareto-efficient allocations of highest welfare

We allocate objects to agents as exemplified primarily by school choice. Welfare judgments of the object-allocating agency are encoded as edge weights in the acceptability graph. The welfare of an allocation is the sum of its edge weights. We introduce the constrained welfare-maximizing solution, which is the allocation of highest welfare among the Pareto-efficient allocations. We identify conditions under which this solution is easily determined from a computational point of view. For the unrestricted case, we formulate an integer program and find this to be viable in practice as it quickly solves a real-world instance of kindergarten allocation and large-scale simulated instances. Incentives to report preferences truthfully are discussed briefly.

[1]  Eric Budish,et al.  Strategy-Proofness in the Large , 2017, The Review of Economic Studies.

[2]  Steve Alpern,et al.  Equilibria of two-sided matching games with common preferences , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Shengwu Li Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms , 2017 .

[4]  Péter Biró,et al.  Efficiency and fair access in Kindergarten allocation policy design , 2017 .

[5]  Harold W. Kuhn,et al.  The Hungarian method for the assignment problem , 1955, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[6]  Ran I. Shorrer,et al.  Obvious Mistakes in a Strategically Simple College Admissions Environment , 2017 .

[7]  H. Scarf The Core of an N Person Game , 1967 .

[8]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Matching with indifferences: A comparison of algorithms in the context of course allocation , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Kolos Csaba Ágoston,et al.  Integer programming methods for special college admissions problems , 2016, J. Comb. Optim..

[10]  Alexander Teytelboym,et al.  Stability in Matching Markets with Complex Constraints , 2019, EC.

[11]  David Manlove,et al.  The Hospitals / Residents Problem with Couples: Complexity and Integer Programming Models , 2013, SEA.

[12]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Resolving Conflicting Preferences in School Choice , 2009 .

[13]  Avinatan Hassidim,et al.  Assigning Israeli medical graduates to internships , 2015, Israel Journal of Health Policy Research.

[14]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The New York City High School Match , 2005 .

[15]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Minimizing Justified Envy in School Choice: The Design of New Orleans&Apos; Oneapp , 2017 .

[16]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Weak Versus Strong Domination in a Market with Indivisible Goods , 1977 .

[17]  Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al.  RANDOM SERIAL DICTATORSHIP AND THE CORE FROM RANDOM ENDOWMENTS IN HOUSE ALLOCATION PROBLEMS , 1998 .

[18]  Kurt Mehlhorn,et al.  Assigning Papers to Referees , 2009, Algorithmica.

[19]  Jérôme Monnot,et al.  Optimal Reallocation under Additive and Ordinal Preferences , 2016, AAMAS.

[20]  L. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 1962 .

[21]  Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al.  School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach , 2003 .

[22]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Matching with Contracts , 2005 .

[23]  Tamás Fleiner,et al.  Matching couples with Scarf’s algorithm , 2015, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[24]  A. Roth,et al.  The Redesign of the Matching Market for American Physicians: Some Engineering Aspects of Economic Design , 1999, The American economic review.

[25]  Katarína Cechlárová,et al.  On a generalization of the stable roommates problem , 2005, TALG.

[26]  Olivier Tercieux,et al.  The Design of Teacher Assignment: Theory and Evidence , 2015 .

[27]  Itai Ashlagi,et al.  Optimal allocation without money: an engineering approach , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Finding approximate competitive equilibria: efficient and fair course allocation , 2010, AAMAS.

[29]  David Manlove,et al.  Pareto Optimal Matchings in Many-to-Many Markets with Ties , 2015, Theory of Computing Systems.

[30]  David Manlove,et al.  Algorithmics of Matching Under Preferences , 2013, Bull. EATCS.

[31]  Kirk Bansak,et al.  Improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment , 2018, Science.

[32]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Two-Sided Matching for the U . S . Navy Detailing Process with Market Complication ∗ , 2003 .

[33]  Itai Ashlagi,et al.  Optimal Allocation Without Money: An Engineering Approach , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Guillaume Haeringer,et al.  Market Design: Auctions and Matching , 2018 .

[35]  David Manlove,et al.  Size Versus Stability in the Marriage Problem , 2010, WAOA.

[36]  L. Shapley,et al.  On cores and indivisibility , 1974 .

[37]  Dominik Hangartner,et al.  How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers , 2016, Science.

[38]  David Gale The theory of linear economic models , 1960 .

[39]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Expanding 'Choice' in School Choice , 2008 .

[40]  Marco Chiarandini,et al.  Handling preferences in student-project allocation , 2017, Annals of Operations Research.

[41]  Tamás Fleiner,et al.  A Fixed-Point Approach to Stable Matchings and Some Applications , 2003, Math. Oper. Res..

[42]  H. Kuhn The Hungarian method for the assignment problem , 1955 .

[43]  Peng Shi,et al.  Guiding School-Choice Reform through Novel Applications of Operations Research , 2015, Interfaces.

[44]  Yan Chen,et al.  School Choice : An Experimental Study ∗ , 2004 .

[45]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The Boston Public School Match , 2005 .

[46]  A. Roth On the Allocation of Residents to Rural Hospitals: A General Property of Two-Sided Matching Markets , 1986 .

[47]  Judd B. Kessler,et al.  Course Match: A Large-Scale Implementation of Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes for Combinatorial Allocation , 2015, Oper. Res..

[48]  David Manlove,et al.  Hard variants of stable marriage , 2002, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[49]  Orhan Aygün,et al.  Large-Scale Affirmative Action in School Choice: Admissions to IITs in India , 2017 .

[50]  Dirk Briskorn,et al.  A Branch-and-Price algorithm for stable workforce assignments with hierarchical skills , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Uriel G. Rothblum,et al.  A stable matching model with an entrance criterion applied to the assignment of students to dormitories at the technion , 2008, Int. J. Game Theory.

[52]  P. Biró Applications of Matching Models under Preferences , 2017 .

[53]  A. Roth The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[54]  Aytek Erdil,et al.  What's the Matter with Tie-Breaking? Improving Efficiency in School Choice , 2008 .

[55]  Jens Hainmueller,et al.  Determinants of refugee naturalization in the United States , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  H. Rapoport,et al.  Tradable Immigration Quotas , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[57]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[58]  Alexander Teytelboym,et al.  Placement Optimization in Refugee Resettlement , 2021, Oper. Res..

[59]  Kurt Mehlhorn,et al.  Pareto Optimality in House Allocation Problems , 2005, ISAAC.

[60]  Daniela Sabán,et al.  The Complexity of Computing the Random Priority Allocation Matrix , 2015, Math. Oper. Res..

[61]  H. Oosterbeek,et al.  The Performance of School Assignment Mechanisms in Practice , 2015, Journal of Political Economy.

[62]  Robert W. Irving,et al.  An efficient algorithm for the “optimal” stable marriage , 1987, JACM.

[63]  L. Ehlers,et al.  Assigning Refugees to Landlords in Sweden: Efficient, Stable, and Maximum Matchings* , 2019, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics.

[64]  Tayfun Sönmez,et al.  Affirmative Action in India via Vertical and Horizontal Reservations , 2019 .

[65]  David Gale,et al.  Some remarks on the stable matching problem , 1985, Discret. Appl. Math..

[66]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Resolving Conflicting Preferences in School Choice: The 'Boston' Mechanism Reconsidered , 2009 .

[67]  Dominik Hangartner,et al.  Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[68]  Inácio Bó,et al.  College Admission with Multidimensional Privileges: The Brazilian Affirmative Action Case , 2020, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics.