Damage to the right temporoparietal junction, but not lateral prefrontal or insular cortex, amplifies the role of goal-directed attention

Whether an object captures attention depends on the interplay between its saliency and current behavioral predispositions of the observer. Neuroimaging work has implied a ventral attention network, comprising the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC) and the insula, in attentional orienting toward salient events. Activity of the TPJ is driven by novel and unexpected objects, while the lateral prefrontal cortex is involved in stimulus-driven as well as goal-directed processing. The insula in turn, is part of a saliency network, which has been implicated in detecting biologically salient signals. These roles predict that damage to the TPJ, lPFC, or insula should affect performance in tasks measuring the capture of attention by salient and behaviorally relevant events. Here, we show that patients with lesions to the right TPJ have a characteristic increase of attentional capture by relevant distracters. In contrast, damage to the lPFC or insular cortex only increases reaction times, irrespective of the task-relevant properties of distracters. These findings show that acquired damage to the TPJ pathologically amplifies the capture of attention by task-relevant information, and thus indicate that the TPJ has a decisive role in goal-directed orienting.

[1]  R. Ptak,et al.  Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect , 2006, Brain Research.

[2]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[3]  G. Luppino,et al.  Cortical connections of the inferior parietal cortical convexity of the macaque monkey. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  Awareness of the Functioning of One's Own Limbs Mediated by the Insular Cortex? , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[6]  Radek Ptak,et al.  Spatial neglect and the neural coding of attentional priority , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[7]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[10]  H. Rolf Jäger,et al.  Enantiomorphic normalization of focally lesioned brains , 2008, NeuroImage.

[11]  Céline R. Gillebert,et al.  Spatial attention deficits in humans: The critical role of superior compared to inferior parietal lesions , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[14]  R. Remington,et al.  Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture , 2006 .

[15]  Bradley S. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture Is Contingent on Attentional Set for Displaywide Visual Features , 1998 .

[16]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  L. Gauthier,et al.  The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. , 1989 .

[18]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Normal and Impaired Reflexive Orienting of Attention after Central Nonpredictive Cues , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Simons Attentional capture and inattentional blindness , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  R. Ptak,et al.  The neural correlates of object-centered processing in reading: A lesion study of neglect dyslexia , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  R. Ptak,et al.  A non-spatial bias favouring fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  Armin Schnider,et al.  The attention network of the human brain: Relating structural damage associated with spatial neglect to functional imaging correlates of spatial attention , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  J. Decety,et al.  The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in Social Interaction: How Low-Level Computational Processes Contribute to Meta-Cognition , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[27]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Jacqueline Gottlieb,et al.  Spatial and non-spatial functions of the parietal cortex , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  Salil H. Patel,et al.  Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected Studies of the Event-Related Potential , 2005, International journal of medical sciences.

[30]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex , 2005, Psychological science.

[31]  Aurelie L. Manuel,et al.  Task relevance effects in electrophysiological brain activity: Early, but not first , 2014, NeuroImage.

[32]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  M. Mesulam Principles of behavioral neurology , 1985 .

[34]  P. Schlattmann,et al.  P300 and LORETA: Comparison of Normal Subjects and Schizophrenic Patients , 2004, Brain Topography.

[35]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Latencies of visually responsive neurons in various regions of the rhesus monkey brain and their relation to human visual responses , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[36]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template , 2008, NeuroImage.

[38]  J. Duncan,et al.  Adaptive Coding of Task-Relevant Information in Human Frontoparietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Jamie Ward,et al.  The neuropsychological impact of insular cortex lesions , 2010, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[40]  Armin Schnider,et al.  Reflexive orienting in spatial neglect is biased towards behaviourally salient stimuli. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  H. Critchley,et al.  Visceral Influences on Brain and Behavior , 2013, Neuron.

[42]  Earl K Miller,et al.  Cortical circuits for the control of attention , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Dissociation of stimulus relevance and saliency factors during shifts of visuospatial attention. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  R. Ptak,et al.  A neuroanatomical model of space-based and object-centered processing in spatial neglect , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[46]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Dorsal and Ventral Attention Systems , 2014, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[47]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[48]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  F. Dick,et al.  Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  L. Uddin Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  S. Yamaguchi,et al.  Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300 , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[52]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect , 2007, Neuron.

[53]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  O. Blanke,et al.  Right insular damage decreases heartbeat awareness and alters cardio-visual effects on bodily self-consciousness , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Connectivity-based subdivisions of the human right "temporoparietal junction area": evidence for different areas participating in different cortical networks. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  J. Gottlieb Attention, Learning, and the Value of Information , 2012, Neuron.

[57]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[58]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization , 2012, NeuroImage.

[59]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Armin Schnider,et al.  The Dorsal Attention Network Mediates Orienting toward Behaviorally Relevant Stimuli in Spatial Neglect , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Interaction of Stimulus-Driven Reorienting and Expectation in Ventral and Dorsal Frontoparietal and Basal Ganglia-Cortical Networks , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  C. Constantinidis,et al.  Early involvement of prefrontal cortex in visual bottom up attention , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  D. Royall,et al.  CLOX: an executive clock drawing task , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[65]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990 .

[66]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Feature-Based Attention in the Frontal Eye Field and Area V4 during Visual Search , 2011, Neuron.

[67]  R. Klein,et al.  A review of the evidence for a disengage deficit following parietal lobe damage , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[68]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Re-evaluating the Role of Tpj in Attentional Control: Contextual Updating? , 2022 .

[69]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[70]  Massimo Silvetti,et al.  Damage to white matter pathways in subacute and chronic spatial neglect: a group study and 2 single-case studies with complete virtual "in vivo" tractography dissection. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Lesion evidence for the critical role of the intraparietal sulcus in spatial attention. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[72]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[73]  Giuseppe Vallar,et al.  Spatial neglect and perseveration in visuomotor exploration. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[74]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[75]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[76]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[77]  R. Ptak,et al.  The Dorsal Frontoparietal Network: A Core System for Emulated Action , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[78]  S. Kastner,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention Control in Frontal and Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[80]  T. Paus,et al.  Cortical regions involved in eye movements, shifts of attention, and gaze perception , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[81]  L. Itti,et al.  Mechanisms of top-down attention , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[82]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[83]  Suk Won Han,et al.  Functional Fractionation of the Stimulus-Driven Attention Network , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[84]  E. Miller,et al.  Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices , 2007, Science.

[85]  S. Huettel,et al.  A nexus model of the temporal–parietal junction , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[86]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[87]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2003, Nature.

[88]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[89]  Lesley K Fellows,et al.  Ventromedial Frontal Cortex Is Critical for Guiding Attention to Reward-Predictive Visual Features in Humans , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[90]  M. Thiebaut de Schotten,et al.  Atlasing the frontal lobe connections and their variability due to age and education: a spherical deconvolution tractography study , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.

[91]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[92]  M. Goldberg,et al.  A Rapid and Precise On-Response in Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.