Direct-manipulation animation: incorporating the haptic channel in the learning process to support middle school students in science learning and mental model acquisition

The study reported here investigated what learners need to construct and master mental models of systems. To enable learners to perform the cognitive processing needed to understand structure, purposes, and functional relations among system entities, we developed a special form of animation: Direct-manipulation animation. Furthermore, we propose a cognitive processing model that elucidates the process of learning with information presented through auditory, visual, and haptic channels. To answer our research questions, an empirical study was conducted with 157 seventh-grade public school students, who were asked to learn about Newtonian mechanics with narrative-only, narrative-and-static-visuals, or narrative-and-animation. The effect of content complexity on learning with different presentation formats was also examined. Our findings suggest that direct-manipulation animation, incorporating the haptic channel in the learning process, provided learners with proper learning experiences to reason about structural causal interactions and functional relations in systems; this in turn facilitated acquisition of mental models of systems.

[1]  G. Halford Children's Understanding: The Development of Mental Models , 1993 .

[2]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[3]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Using Computer Animated Graphics in Science Instruction with Children , 1990 .

[4]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[5]  M. Jacobson Problem Solving About Complex Systems: Differences Between Experts and Novices , 2000 .

[6]  J. Bransford,et al.  Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach ☆ ☆☆ , 1972 .

[7]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.

[8]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[9]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  The mental models theory language of comprehension , 1996 .

[10]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[11]  Alberto Villani,et al.  Understanding conservation laws in mechanics: Students' conceptual change in learning about collisions , 1993 .

[12]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[13]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  John B. Black,et al.  When can animation improve learning? Some implications on human computer interaction and learning , 2005 .

[15]  Paul J. Feltovich Conceptual Understanding and Stability, and Knowledge Shields for Fending Off Conceptual Change. Technical Report No. 7. , 1994 .

[16]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[17]  M. Resnick,et al.  Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World , 1999 .

[18]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The mental representation of spatial descriptions , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[21]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  The Effects of Computer Animated Elaboration Strategies and Practice on Factual and Application Learning in an Elementary Science Lesson , 1989 .

[22]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[23]  A. Parkin,et al.  Human memory , 1999, Current Biology.

[24]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1989 .

[25]  R. Clark Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[26]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[28]  Elizabeth Anne George,et al.  Learning Energy, Momentum, and Conservation Concepts with Computer Support in an Undergraduate Physics Laboratory , 2000 .

[29]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Assessing dynamics in computer-based instruction , 1996, CHI.

[31]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Analog Imagery in Mental Model Reasoning: Depictive Models , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.