A model for the formation of ocular dominance stripes

The paper describes a model of competition that explains the formation of the ocular dominance stripes found in layer IVc of cat and monkey visual cortex. The main proposal is that synapses exert effects on the growth of other synapses, and that these effects extend over distances of at least 600 μm and vary in magnitude and sign within this distance. Interactions between like type synapses are assumed to be stimulating for distances up to about 200 μm, and inhibitory for distances of 200-600 μm. The reverse is true of interactions between synapses of opposite eye type, where the effects are inhibitory for distances up to about 200 μm and stimulating for longer ones. The interactions are assumed to be circularly symmetric. Growth of, for example, right eye synapses at one point will therefore (a) encourage local growth of right eye synapses and inhibit local growth of left eye synapses and (b) encourage growth of left eye synapses and inhibit growth of right eye synapses in an annular ring surrounding the point of initial increase. At the start of development, right and left eye synapses are assumed to be intermixed randomly within layer IVc. Computer simulations show that a wide variety of conditions incorporating these assumptions will lead to the formation of stripe patterns. These reproduce many of the morphological features of monkey ocular dominance stripes, including Y- and Н-type branches and terminations, the tendency for stripes to run at right angles into the boundaries of the pattern, and to narrow at branch points. The model can explain the effects of monocular deprivation on stripe morphology if it is assumed that the effectiveness of deprived eye synapses in determining rates of growth locally is reduced. The existence of a critical period for these effects can be explained if it is assumed that lateral growth of terminals does not occur, and that some factor such as a limited availability of postsynaptic sites decreases the rate of growth of synapses as their density approaches a maximum. The model can be generalized to account for pattern formation in other systems, such as zebra or mackerel skin, where similar striped patterns occur. In this context, the simplest model based on diffusion that will produce a pattern of stripes requires that one cell type should secrete two substances, one of which stimulates growth or differentiation of its parent cell type and has a low rate of diffusion or is rapidly inactivated, and another that inhibits growth or differentiation and either has a higher rate of diffusion or is less rapidly inactivated. A preliminary account of some of these results has appeared elsewhere (Swindale 1979).

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Laminar and columnar distribution of geniculo‐cortical fibers in the macaque monkey , 1972, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  D H Hubel,et al.  Autoradiographic demonstration of ocular-dominance columns in the monkey striate cortex by means of transneuronal transport. , 1974, Brain research.

[5]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ordered arrangement of orientation columns in monkeys lacking visual experience , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  J. Bard,et al.  How well does Turing's theory of morphogenesis work? , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  H. Meinhardt,et al.  Applications of a theory of biological pattern formation based on lateral inhibition. , 1974, Journal of cell science.

[8]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Functional reinnervation in kitten visual cortex , 1974, Nature.

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  Mode of termination of retinotectal fibers in macaque monkey: An autoradiographic study , 1975, Brain Research.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  The pattern of ocular dominance columns in macaque visual cortex revealed by a reduced silver stain , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  Ann M. Graybiel,et al.  Anatomical organization of retinotectal afferents in the cat: An autodiographic study , 1975, Brain Research.

[12]  B. Cragg,et al.  The development of synapses in the visual system of the cat , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Depletion of brain catecholamines: failure of ocular dominance shift after monocular occlusion in kittens. , 1976, Science.

[14]  P. Rakic Prenatal genesis of connections subserving ocular dominance in the rhesus monkey , 1976, Nature.

[15]  J. Movshon Reversal of the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in the kitten's visual cortex. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  C. Malsburg,et al.  A mechanism for producing continuous neural mappings: ocularity dominance stripes and ordered retino , 1976 .

[17]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Laminar patterns of geniculocortical projection in the cat , 1976, Brain Research.

[18]  T. Wiesel,et al.  The distribution of afferents representing the right and left eyes in the cat's visual cortex , 1977, Brain Research.

[19]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Recovery from the effects of monocular deprivation in kittens , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  W. Nauta,et al.  An intricately patterned prefronto‐caudate projection in the rhesus monkey , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  W. Nauta,et al.  Columnar distribution of cortico-cortical fibers in the frontal association, limbic, and motor cortex of the developing rhesus monkey , 1977, Brain Research.

[22]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977 .

[23]  D. Hubel,et al.  Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex. , 1977, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  Ann M. Graybiel,et al.  Organization of the nigrotectal connection: an experimental tracer study in the cat , 1978, Brain Research.

[25]  Hubel Dh Effects of deprivation on the visual cortex of cat and monkey. , 1978 .

[26]  D. Hubel,et al.  Anatomical demonstration of orientation columns in macaque monkey , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  R. Freeman,et al.  Monocular deprivation and recovery during sensitive period in kittens. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Graybiel,et al.  A stereometric pattern of distribution of acetylthiocholinesterase in the deep layers of the superior colliculus , 1978, Nature.

[29]  C. Blakemore Maturation and Modification in the Developing Visual System , 1978 .

[30]  S. Levay,et al.  Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex: A quantitative study , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  M. Stryker,et al.  Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The physiological effects of monocular deprivation and their reversal in the monkey's visual cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  M. Law,et al.  Eye-specific termination bands in tecta of three-eyed frogs. , 1978, Science.

[34]  How Ocular Dominance Stripes May Be Formed , 1979 .

[35]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  A difference in [14C]deoxyglucose autoradiographic patterns in striate cortex between Macaca and Saimiri monkeys following monocular stimulation , 1979, Brain Research.

[36]  M. Cynader,et al.  Competitive Interactions in Postnatal Development of the Kitten’s Visual System , 1979 .