Spatial summation of responses in receptive fields of single cells in cat striate cortex

SummarySpatial summation of responses in striate neurons in cats under N2O/O2 anaesthesia was examined quantitatively both along the line of the optimal stimulus orientation (length summation) using moving light bars and single light and dark edge stimuli, and at right angles to the optimal orientation (width summation) using stationary flashing bars. Activity profiles and length-response curves were prepared from simple, complex and hypercomplex I and II cells. An activity profile indicates the responsiveness of a cell at locations along the length of its receptive field. The activity profiles from all cell types were usually well fitted by Gaussian functions. Length summation occurs both in end-free (simple and complex) and, to a lesser extent, in end-stopped (hypercomplex I and II) cells over a wide range of stimulus contrasts (0.13 to 0.95). The linearity of length summation was tested either by comparing the recorded length-response curves with the curves predicted from the linear integration of the activity profiles or by comparing the response to the activation of two regions of the receptive field with the sum of the responses to each region activated separately. Although length summation was usually non-linear (either greater than or less than direct proportionality) it was more nearly linear in complex than it was in simple and hypercomplex I cells. Mechanisms responsible for non-linear length summation were studied, including a threshold for discharge, response saturation and summation of end-zone inhibition. Complex cells show little width summation for bars wider than 0.3 °. In simple and hypercomplex I cells there was also relatively little width summation either in an ON or an OFF discharge region at contrasts above about 0.4 but at lower contrasts width summation may be approximately linear. Spatial summation of responses does not appear to be a useful characteristic for distinguishing one striate cell type from another.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  B. Cleland,et al.  Quantitative aspects of sensitivity and summation in the cat retina , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Sensitivity distribution and spatial summation within receptive-field center of retinal on-center ganglion cells and transfer function of the retina. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Interaction effects of visual contours on the discharge frequency of simple striate neurones , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Responses to visual contours: spatio‐temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurones , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Binocular interaction fields of single units in the cat striate cortex , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  B. Dreher Hypercomplex cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[11]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Striate neurons: receptive field concepts. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[12]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Orientation specificity and response variability of cells in the striate cortex. , 1973, Vision research.

[13]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  D. Rose Proceedings: The hypercomplex cell classification in the cat's striate cortex. , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  ROBERT SHAPLEY,et al.  Visual spatial summation in two classes of geniculate cells , 1975, Nature.

[16]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Direction selectivity of simple striate cells: properties and mechanism. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  I. Abramov,et al.  An analysis of spatial summation in the receptive fields of goldfish retinal ganglion cells , 1975, Vision Research.

[18]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  R. Shapley,et al.  Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  R. Shapley,et al.  Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  D. Pollen,et al.  Responses of complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat as a function of the length of moving slits , 1976, Brain Research.

[22]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat straite cortex. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.