Evaluation of 3D LiDAR Sensor Setup for Heterogeneous Robot Team

We encounter a world where the role of robots has increased in society. Day by day, we can observe that problems related to autonomous vehicles are being solved. The focused problem that we have recently confronted is based on collaborative mapping with multi-robots since collaboratively generated map provides more information about the environment than with a single robot. Moreover, the mapping framework for robot team can be more efficient if 3D laser sensors are placed to cover wider area. However, laser sensors are commonly positioned intuitively and depended mostly on the designer’s choice. To overcome designer-independent laser sensor setup for efficient collaborative mapping, a subjective evaluation of laser sensor placement is developed as another key aspect. This paper proposed a collaborative mapping framework for heterogeneous robot teams to make full use of collected information from different viewpoints and explore large areas more efficiently. It’s comprised of two modules, localization of multi-robots and collaborative map construction. In addition, to avoid arbitrary setup of laser sensors in existing methods whose performance is heavily affected by designers’ experience, a metric evaluation system was defined to determine the optimal placements of laser sensors and achieve maximum sweep area. The proposed methods were verified on both simulation and experiments which were carried out on a heterogeneous robot team (including an unmanned aerial vehicle and a ground vehicle). According to the metric evaluation, best placements were chosen for the laser sensors, and presented collaborative mapping technique was shown to work more efficiently compared with existing methods.

[1]  Bin Liang,et al.  An Iterative Closest Points Algorithm for Registration of 3D Laser Scanner Point Clouds with Geometric Features , 2017, Sensors.

[2]  Gang Zhang,et al.  Mobile Robot Localization Based on Extended Kalman Filter , 2006, 2006 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[3]  Oskar von Stryk,et al.  Comprehensive Simulation of Quadrotor UAVs Using ROS and Gazebo , 2012, SIMPAR.

[4]  Andreas Birk,et al.  On map merging , 2005, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[5]  Zhihua Wang,et al.  Bi-direction ICP: Fast registration method of point clouds , 2017, 2017 Fifteenth IAPR International Conference on Machine Vision Applications (MVA).

[6]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  OctoMap: an efficient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees , 2013, Autonomous Robots.

[7]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Collaborative 3D Reconstruction Using Heterogeneous UAVs: System and Experiments , 2016, ISER.

[8]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Landmark-based Matching Algorithm for Cooperative Mapping by Autonomous Robots , 2000, DARS.

[9]  Jiří Hörner,et al.  Map-merging for multi-robot system , 2016 .

[10]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  AgriColMap: Aerial-Ground Collaborative 3D Mapping for Precision Farming , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[12]  Chee Sun Won,et al.  Omnidirectional 3D Point Clouds Using Dual Kinect Sensors , 2019, J. Sensors.

[13]  M. Joerger,et al.  Autonomous Ground Vehicle Navigation Using Integrated GPS and Laser-scanner Measurements , 2006, 2006 IEEE/ION Position, Location, And Navigation Symposium.

[14]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Coordinating heterogeneous teams of robots using temporal symbolic planning , 2013, Auton. Robots.

[15]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm , 2001, Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling.

[16]  Hakan Temeltas,et al.  A 3D LiDAR Dataset of ITU Heterogeneous Robot Team , 2019, ICRAI '19.

[17]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  On the performance of metrics to predict quality in point cloud representations , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[18]  Philippe Giguère,et al.  Mapping forests using an unmanned ground vehicle with 3D LiDAR and graph-SLAM , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[19]  Yuanyu Yu,et al.  An Analytical Model for Bandwidth Enhancement of Air-Coupled Unsealed Helmholtz Structural CMUTs , 2019, J. Sensors.

[20]  Jonathon J. Donager,et al.  UAV lidar and hyperspectral fusion for forest monitoring in the southwestern USA , 2017 .

[21]  Jon Louis Bentley,et al.  Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching , 1975, CACM.

[22]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Development of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Wolfgang Hönig,et al.  Trajectory Planning for Heterogeneous Robot Teams , 2018, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[24]  Luis Miguel Bergasa,et al.  Real-Time Hierarchical Outdoor SLAM Based on Stereovision and GPS Fusion , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[25]  Kostas Daniilidis,et al.  Fully Automatic Registration of 3D Point Clouds , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[26]  Radu Bogdan Rusu,et al.  3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[27]  Kurt Konolige,et al.  Many Robots Make Short Work , 1997, AAAI 1997.

[28]  Stefan Hinz,et al.  POINT CLOUD ANALYSIS FOR UAV-BORNE LASER SCANNING WITH HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY ORIENTED LINE SCANNERS – CONCEPT AND FIRST RESULTS , 2017 .