Segregation of spatially superimposed optic flow components.

The transparency phenomenon, which arises when a radial and a rotational motion pattern are spatially superimposed, suggests that these motion patterns are processed independently. Indeed, for unrestricted stimulus durations, observers could identify the rotational pattern as clockwise or counterclockwise, and the radial pattern as expansion or contraction, even under uncertainty. However, when the time available to process the compound stimulus was equal to the minimum duration required to identify each of the patterns when presented in isolation, identification was impaired. Whereas for spirallike motion patterns the radial and rotational components could be identified, radial and rotational motion patterns were not processed independently when superimposed. Although radial and rotational transformations could not be identified simultaneously, a coherent optic flow pattern could be segregated from another superimposed optic flow component given definite foreknowledge. Language: en

[1]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Learning to See Complex Random-Dot Stereograms , 1975 .

[2]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Perception of Movement and Correlation in Stroboscopically Presented Noise Patterns , 1985, Perception.

[3]  J. E. Albano,et al.  The role of directionally selective neurons in the perception of global motion , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  J F Norman,et al.  The Detectability of Geometric Structure in Rapidly Changing Optical Patterns , 1991, Perception.

[5]  R Sekuler,et al.  Mental set alters visibility of moving targets , 1977, Science.

[6]  H. Berg Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.: Vol. LII. Evolution of Catalytic Functions. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1987, ISBN 0-87969-054-2, xix + 955 pp., US $150.00. , 1989 .

[7]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  Visual stream Segregation , 1973 .

[8]  Petersik Jt The two-process distinction in apparent motion. , 1989 .

[9]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[11]  Ellen C. Hildreth,et al.  Measurement of Visual Motion , 1984 .

[12]  A. Verri,et al.  First-order analysis of optical flow in monkey brain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Lee Dn,et al.  The optic flow field: the foundation of vision. , 1980 .

[14]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The Analysis of Motion Signals and the Nature of Processing in the Primate Visual System , 1992 .

[15]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The role of direction information in the perception of geometric optic flow components , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. , 1979, Science.

[17]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[18]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[19]  Robert Jefferson Snowden,et al.  Motions in orthogonal directions are mutually suppressive , 1989 .

[20]  G. Orban,et al.  Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns , 1988, Vision Research.

[21]  G J Andersen Perception of three-dimensional structure from optic flow without locally smooth velocity. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[23]  P. G. H. Clarke,et al.  Subjective standstill caused by the interaction of moving patterns , 1977, Vision Research.

[24]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[25]  R Vogels,et al.  The Effect of Feature Uncertainty on Spatial Discriminations , 1988, Perception.

[26]  J. Cowan,et al.  Localized effects of spatial frequency adaptation. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Charles G. Gross,et al.  Pattern recognition mechanisms , 1985 .

[29]  S. McKee,et al.  Sequential recruitment in the discrimination of velocity. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  J A Movshon,et al.  Visual cortical signals supporting smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.

[31]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions , 1984, Vision Research.

[32]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  J. Gibson,et al.  Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  J S Lappin,et al.  Prior knowledge does not facilitate the perceptual organization of dynamic random-dot patterns , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Evidence for rhythmic attention. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[37]  R. Fox,et al.  Stimulus uncertainty does not impair stereopsis , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  G A Orban,et al.  The Importance of Velocity Gradients in the Perception of Three-Dimensional Rigidity , 1990, Perception.

[39]  R Sekuler,et al.  Models of stimulus uncertainty in motion perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[40]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Local structure of movement parallax of the plane , 1976 .

[41]  S. Ullman The Interpretation of Visual Motion , 1979 .

[42]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion , 1986, Vision Research.

[43]  S. Cobb,et al.  Perception of 3-D structure from motion: The role of velocity gradients and segmentation boundaries , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.