Explaining Potential Risks in Traffic Scenes by Combining Logical Inference and Physical Simulation

The automatic recognition of risks in traffic scenes is a core technology of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADASs). Most of the existing work on traffic risk recognition has been conducted in the context of motion prediction of vehicles. Thus, existing systems rely on directly observed information (e.g., velocity), whereas the exploitation of implicit information inferable from observed information (e.g., the intention of pedestrians) has rarely been explored. Our previous approach used abductive reasoning to infer implicit information from observation and jointly identify the most-likely risks in traffic scenes. However, abductive frameworks do not exploit quantitative information explicitly, which leads to a lack of grounds for physical quantities. This paper proposes a novel risk recognition model combining first-order logical abduction-based symbolic reasoning with a simulation based on physical quantities. We build a novel benchmark dataset of real-life traffic scenes that are potentially risky. Our evaluation demonstrates the potential of our approach. The developed dataset has been made publicly available for research purposes.

[1]  Kentaro Inui,et al.  Boosting the Efficiency of First-Order Abductive Reasoning Using Pre-estimated Relatedness between Predicates , 2015 .

[2]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Progress with situation assessment and risk prediction in advanced driver assistance systems: A survey , 2009 .

[3]  Dizan Vasquez,et al.  A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles , 2014, ROBOMECH Journal.

[4]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Pedestrian detection: A benchmark , 2009, CVPR.

[5]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Pedestrian Detection: An Evaluation of the State of the Art , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Rossitza Setchi,et al.  Ontology-based Framework for Risk Assessment in Road Scenes Using Videos , 2015, KES.

[7]  Matthias Althoff,et al.  Model-Based Probabilistic Collision Detection in Autonomous Driving , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[8]  Monica N. Nicolescu,et al.  Vehicle classification framework: a comparative study , 2014, EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing.

[9]  Kentaro Inui,et al.  Recognizing Potential Traffic Risks through Logic-based Deep Scene Understanding , 2015 .

[10]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  A mobile vision system for robust multi-person tracking , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  B. Schiele,et al.  How Far are We from Solving Pedestrian Detection? , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[12]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data , 2002, KDD.

[13]  Hermann Winner,et al.  Three Decades of Driver Assistance Systems: Review and Future Perspectives , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[14]  Dariu Gavrila,et al.  Monocular Pedestrian Detection: Survey and Experiments , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  T. Kanade,et al.  Monte Carlo road safety reasoning , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005..

[16]  Xu Sun,et al.  Latent Variable Perceptron Algorithm for Structured Classification , 2009, IJCAI.

[17]  Ryutaro Ichise,et al.  Ontology-based decision making on uncontrolled intersections and narrow roads , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[18]  Paulo E. Santos,et al.  Probabilistic Logic Reasoning about Traffic Scenes , 2011, TAROS.

[19]  Andreas Geiger,et al.  Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[20]  David Filliat,et al.  Ontology-based context awareness for driving assistance systems , 2014, 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings.