Use of Audiovisual Information in Speech Perception by Prelingually Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants: A First Report

Objective Although there has been a great deal of recent empirical work and new theoretical interest in audiovisual speech perception in both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults, relatively little is known about the development of these abilities and skills in deaf children with cochlear implants. This study examined how prelingually deafened children combine visual information available in the talker’s face with auditory speech cues provided by their cochlear implants to enhance spoken language comprehension. Design Twenty-seven hearing-impaired children who use cochlear implants identified spoken sentences presented under auditory-alone and audiovisual conditions. Five additional measures of spoken word recognition performance were used to assess auditory-alone speech perception skills. A measure of speech intelligibility was also obtained to assess the speech production abilities of these children. Results A measure of audiovisual gain, “Ra,” was computed using sentence recognition scores in auditory-alone and audiovisual conditions. Another measure of audiovisual gain, “Rv,” was computed using scores in visual-alone and audiovisual conditions. The results indicated that children who were better at recognizing isolated spoken words through listening alone were also better at combining the complementary sensory information about speech articulation available under audiovisual stimulation. In addition, we found that children who received more benefit from audiovisual presentation also produced more intelligible speech, suggesting a close link between speech perception and production and a common underlying linguistic basis for audiovisual enhancement effects. Finally, an examination of the distribution of children enrolled in Oral Communication (OC) and Total Communication (TC) indicated that OC children tended to score higher on measures of audiovisual gain, spoken word recognition, and speech intelligibility. Conclusions The relationships observed between auditory-alone speech perception, audiovisual benefit, and speech intelligibility indicate that these abilities are not based on independent language skills, but instead reflect a common source of linguistic knowledge, used in both perception and production, that is based on the dynamic, articulatory motions of the vocal tract. The effects of communication mode demonstrate the important contribution of early sensory experience to perceptual development, specifically, language acquisition and the use of phonological processing skills. Intervention and treatment programs that aim to increase receptive and productive spoken language skills, therefore, may wish to emphasize the inherent cross-correlations that exist between auditory and visual sources of information in speech perception.

[1]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Integral processing of visual place and auditory voicing information during phonetic perception. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  N. P. Erber,et al.  Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  William W. Gaver What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception , 1993 .

[4]  J. A. Johnson,et al.  Point-light facial displays enhance comprehension of speech in noise. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Multimodal perceptual organization of speech: Evidence from tone analogs of spoken utterances , 1998, Speech Commun..

[6]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[7]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Cochlear implantation in children younger than 2 years old. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[8]  R. Miyamoto,et al.  Comparison of Sensory Aids in Deaf Children , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[9]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Cognitive Factors and Cochlear Implants: Some Thoughts on Perception, Learning, and Memory in Speech Perception , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[10]  D. Pisoni Individual Differences in Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants in Prelingually Deaf Children : Some New Process Measures of Performance , 2000 .

[11]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[12]  Lawrence D. Rosenblum,et al.  An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. , 1996 .

[13]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The Intermodal Representation of Speech in Infants , 1984 .

[14]  W. H. Sumby,et al.  Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .

[15]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[16]  D W Massaro,et al.  Speech perception in perceivers with hearing loss: synergy of multiple modalities. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  K. Olsen,et al.  Utility of Near-Total Laryngectomy for Supraglottic, Pharyngeal, Base-of-Tongue, and other Cancers , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[18]  Lisa Lucks Mendel,et al.  Audiologic Evaluation and Management and Speech Perception Assessment , 1997 .

[19]  P M Seligman,et al.  A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  L. Bernstein,et al.  Speechreading and the structure of the lexicon: computationally modeling the effects of reduced phonetic distinctiveness on lexical uniqueness. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  K. Kirk Assessing Speech Perception in Listeners with Cochlear Implants: The Development of the Lexical Neighborhood Tests. , 1998 .

[22]  K. Grant,et al.  Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  N. P. Erber,et al.  Effects of angle, distance, and illumination on visual reception of speech by profoundly deaf children. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  K P Green,et al.  Cross-modal discrepancies in coarticulation and the integration of speech information: the McGurk effect with mismatched vowels. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  L. Rosenblum,et al.  An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Sharon Lesner,et al.  Visual vowel and diphthong perception across speakers , 1981 .

[27]  C. Fowler Real Objects of Speech Perception: A Commentary on Diehl and Kluender , 1989 .

[28]  Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson,et al.  The Dynamics of Audiovisual Behavior in Speech , 1996 .

[29]  M. Svirsky,et al.  Speech Intelligibility of Prelingually Deaf Children with Multichannel Cochlear Implants , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[30]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  On the perceptual organization of speech. , 1994, Psychological review.

[31]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[32]  L. Braida Crossmodal Integration in the Identification of Consonant Segments , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[33]  B J Gantz,et al.  Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[34]  P. L. Jackson The Theoretical Minimal Unit for Visual Speech Perception: Visemes and Coarticulation. , 1988 .

[35]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Speech Intelligibility of Children with Cochlear Implants. , 1994 .

[36]  Q. Summerfield Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. , 1987 .

[37]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Language Development in Profoundly Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants , 2000, Psychological science.

[38]  G. Woodworth,et al.  Speech perception in prelingually implanted children after four years. , 1997, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[39]  J. Risberg,et al.  A speechreading expert: the case of MM. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[40]  B J Gantz,et al.  Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[41]  C. Fowler,et al.  Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Some computational analyses of the PBK test: effects of frequency and lexical density on spoken word recognition. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[43]  P. Chute,et al.  Specific Language Growth in Young Children Using the Clarion® Cochlear Implant , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[44]  N. P. Erber Auditory and audiovisual reception of words in low-frequency noise by children with normal hearing and by children with impaired hearing. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[45]  C. Fowler An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective , 1986 .

[46]  A E Geers,et al.  Working Memory in Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants: Correlations between Digit Span and Measures of Spoken Language Processing , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[47]  B J Gantz,et al.  Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age at implant and length of device use. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[48]  J. R. Coleman,et al.  Histomorphometric and Laryngeal Videostroboscopic Analysis of the Effects of Corticosteroids on Microflap Healing in the Dog Larynx , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[49]  Stan A. Kuczaj,et al.  Handbook of Child Language Acquisition , 2000 .

[50]  D. Massaro,et al.  Perceiving Talking Faces , 1995 .

[51]  L. Bernstein,et al.  Speech perception without hearing , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Preoperative Predictors of Postoperative Implant Performance in Children , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[53]  J. Tomblin,et al.  A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[54]  Hani Yehia,et al.  Characterizing audiovisual information during speech , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[55]  M. Svirsky,et al.  Speech intelligibility of children with multichannel cochlear implants. , 1997, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[56]  W. Parkinson,et al.  Speech perception by prelingually deaf children and postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implant. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[57]  Janet E. Green,et al.  Language Development in Children Implanted with the Clarion® Cochlear Implant , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[58]  M. Svirsky,et al.  Children with implants can speak, but can they communicate? , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[59]  N. P. Erber,et al.  Speech-envelope cues as an acoustic aid to lipreading for profoundly deaf children. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  S. Staller,et al.  Pediatric performance with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[61]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Lexical Effects on Spoken Word Recognition by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[62]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Independent Evaluation of the Speech Perception Abilities of Children with the Nucleus 22‐Channel Cochlear Implant System , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[63]  K. Grant,et al.  Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Individual Differences in Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants in Children Who Are Prelingually Deaf: New Process Measures of Performance. , 1999, The Volta review.

[65]  N. P. Erber Auditory-visual perception of speech. , 1975, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[66]  S. Telian,et al.  Cochlear Implantation of Children with Minimal Open‐Set Speech Recognition Skills , 1997, Ear and hearing.