Development and application of a new method to investigate cognition in newborn guppies

The study of cognitive abilities generally requires that each subject be assessed individually, but social isolation can be stressful, especially for newborns and young individuals. This study aimed to design learning protocols for newly born guppies based on knowledge of their social needs. In Experiment 1, in the first two weeks of life, guppies were much less gregarious than adults but spent significantly more time near social companions than near an empty compartment. When given the choice between social companions and their own mirror image (Experiment 2), they did not exhibit a preference for either virtual or real fish, indicating the possibility of using mirrors as a substitute for social companions during learning experiments. Using these data, we tested two new procedures for studying learning and memory in very young fish. Experiment 3 was a modification of the one-trial test developed for mammals in which subjects are required to discriminate between one new object and one they previously and briefly experienced. Five-day-old guppies allowed to familiarize with a tridimensional object for 20 min proved able, 30 min later, to discriminate the familiar object from a novel one differing in shape and color. For Experiments 4 and 5, we adapted a protocol for discrimination learning for adult fish: two stimuli were repeatedly introduced at opposite ends of the home tank, one reinforced with food. Using this method, we showed that nine-day-old guppies can significantly discriminate two geometric figures (a triangle from a circle) after only twelve reinforced trials.

[1]  H. V. Peeke,et al.  Threat displays and combat aggression in Betta splendens following visual exposure to conspecifics and one-way mirrors. , 1980, Behavioral and neural biology.

[2]  G. Wallis,et al.  Shape learning and discrimination in reef fish , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Lateralization of response to social stimuli in fishes: A comparison between different methods and species , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Piagetian object permanence and its development in Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius) , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[5]  G. Richter-Levin,et al.  Juvenile stress induces a predisposition to either anxiety or depressive-like symptoms following stress in adulthood , 2007, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[6]  R. Colwill,et al.  Visual discrimination learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio) , 2005, Behavioural Processes.

[7]  James J. Anderson Ratio‐ and Predator‐Dependent Functional Forms for Predators Optimally Foraging in Patches , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[8]  A. Magurran,et al.  Schooling decisions in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are based on familiarity rather than kin recognition by phenotype matching , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  F. Knowlton,et al.  Differential responses of coyotes to novel stimuli in familiar and unfamiliar settings , 2001 .

[10]  E. Shaw The Development of Schooling in Fishes. II , 1961, Physiological Zoology.

[11]  Marco Dadda,et al.  A new training procedure for studying discrimination learning in fish , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  M. Morgan The influence of hunger, shoal size and predator presence on foraging in bluntnose minnows , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  J. Godin,et al.  Context-dependent group size choice in fish , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Perception of Subjective Contours in Fish , 2009, Perception.

[15]  Peng Xia,et al.  Modification of hippocampal neurogenesis and neuroplasticity by social environments , 2003, Experimental Neurology.

[16]  D. Madison,et al.  Time dependency and kin recognition of cannibalistic behavior among poeciliid fishes , 1982 .

[17]  E. Shaw The Development of Schooling Behavior in Fishes , 1960, Physiological Zoology.

[18]  G. Nevitt,et al.  Early rearing environment impacts cerebellar growth in juvenile salmon , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  Thomas J. Wills,et al.  Development of the Hippocampal Cognitive Map in Preweanling Rats , 2010, Science.

[20]  E. Wood,et al.  Nonrecurring-items delayed nonmatching-to-sample in rats: A new paradigm for testing nonspatial working memory , 1990, Psychobiology.

[21]  N. Sutherland,et al.  Shape discrimination in rat, octopus, and goldfish: a comparative study. , 1969, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[22]  M. McCormick,et al.  Influence of prey body characteristics and performance on predator selection , 2009, Oecologia.

[23]  K. Kotrschal,et al.  Larval size constraints determine directional ontogenetic shifts in the visual system of teleosts1 , 2009 .

[24]  A. Magurran,et al.  Population Differences in the Schooling Behaviour of Newborn Guppies, Poecilia reticulata , 2010 .

[25]  J. Evans,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Poeciliid Fishes , 2011 .

[26]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Use of Number by Fish , 2009, PloS one.

[27]  Shape Discrimination in Tropical Fish , 1963 .

[28]  D. Bjorklund,et al.  The Evolution and Development of Human Social Cognition , 2010 .

[29]  M. Milinski TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation , 1987, Nature.

[30]  A. Nieder,et al.  Ontogeny of object permanence and object tracking in the carrion crow, Corvus corone , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  N. Sutherland,et al.  Visual discrimination by the goldfish: The orientation of rectangles , 1963 .

[32]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Tit-For-Tat in guppies (Poecilia reticulata): the relative nature of cooperation and defection during predator inspection , 1991, Evolutionary Ecology.

[33]  J. Hunter THE ONSET OF SCHOOLING IN NORTHERN ANCHOVY LARVAE , ENGRAULlS MORDAX , 2003 .

[34]  K. Kotrschal,et al.  Brain growth patterns in four European cyprinid fish species (Cyprinidae, Teleostei): roach (Rutilus rutilus), bream (Abramis brama), common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and sabre carp (Pelecus cultratus). , 1990, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[35]  L. Regolin,et al.  Object and spatial representations in detour problems by chicks , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Ontogeny of Numerical Abilities in Fish , 2010, PloS one.

[37]  A. Shohet,et al.  Female association preferences based on olfactory cues in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  M. Dadda,et al.  Early differences in epithalamic left–right asymmetry influence lateralization and personality of adult zebrafish , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[39]  F. Doré,et al.  Cognitive development in kittens (Felis catus): A cross-sectional study of object permanence. , 1989 .

[40]  R. Clark,et al.  Impaired Recognition Memory in Monkeys after Damage Limited to the Hippocampal Region , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  I. Folstad,et al.  Schooling, dusk flight and dance: social organisations as amplifiers of individual quality? , 2000 .

[42]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Origins of spatial, temporal and numerical cognition: Insights from comparative psychology , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Choice of Female Groups by Male Mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) , 2008 .

[44]  T. J. Pitcher,et al.  The influence of hunger and ration level on shoal density, polarization and swimming speed of herring, Clupea harengus L. , 1989 .

[45]  H. Adler,et al.  Ontogeny of observational learning in the dog (Canis familiaris). , 1977, Developmental psychobiology.

[46]  J. Cronly-Dillon,et al.  Colour discrimination in goldfish. , 1966, Animal behaviour.

[47]  Robert Gerlai,et al.  Shoaling develops with age in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) , 2011, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[48]  Russell D. Fernald,et al.  What do fish make of mirror images? , 2010, Biology Letters.

[49]  J. Godin,et al.  Chemical alarm signals in wild Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 1999 .

[50]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Large Number Discrimination by Mosquitofish , 2010, PLoS ONE.

[51]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[52]  Karin A. Nilsson,et al.  Guppy populations differ in cannibalistic degree and adaptation to structural environments , 2011, Oecologia.

[53]  Kevin N. Laland,et al.  Social learning in fishes : a review , 2003 .

[54]  T. Matsuzawa Comparative cognitive development. , 2007, Developmental science.

[55]  K. Warburton,et al.  Differences in Timidity and Escape Responses between Predator‐naive and Predator‐sympatric Rainbowfish Populations , 1999 .

[56]  J. Evans,et al.  Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  G. Helfman,et al.  Safety in numbers: shoal size choice by minnows under predatory threat , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[58]  C. Frye,et al.  Social isolation stress during the third week of life has age-dependent effects on spatial learning in rats , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[59]  A. Magurran,et al.  Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  G. Hemmings The effect of pretraining in the circle-square discrimination situation. , 1965, Animal behaviour.

[61]  C. Nicol,et al.  Development of spatial memory in occlusion-experienced domestic chicks , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Lateralization of aggression in fish , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[63]  J. Delacour,et al.  A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[64]  R. Bshary,et al.  Fish cognition: a primate's eye view , 2002, Animal Cognition.