Defining interactions: a conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic

Abstract Rapid advances in technology for highly automated vehicles (HAVs) have raised concerns about coexistence of HAVs and human road users. Although there is a long tradition of research into human road user interactions, there is a lack of shared models and terminology to support cross-disciplinary research and development towards safe and acceptable interaction-capable HAVs. Here, we review the main themes and findings in previous theoretical and empirical interaction research, and find large variability in perspectives and terminologies. We unify these perspectives in a structured, cross-theoretical conceptual framework, describing what road traffic interactions are, how they arise, and how they get resolved. Two key contributions are: (1) a stringent definition of “interaction”, as “a situation where the behaviour of at least two road users can be interpreted as being influenced by the possibility that they are both intending to occupy the same region of space at the same time in the near future”, and (2) a taxonomy of the types of behaviours that road users exhibit in interactions. We hope that this conceptual framework will be useful in the development of improved empirical methodology, theoretical models, and technical requirements on vehicle automation.

[1]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[2]  R Risser,et al.  Behavior in traffic conflict situations. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  A Várhelyi,et al.  Drivers' speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Sarah Schmidt,et al.  Pedestrians at the kerb – Recognising the action intentions of humans , 2009 .

[5]  Leah L Thompson,et al.  Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study , 2012, Injury Prevention.

[6]  Irene Gohl,et al.  Analyzing driver-pedestrian interaction at crosswalks: A contribution to autonomous driving in urban environments , 2016, 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[7]  Hussein Dia,et al.  Autonomous Shared Mobility-On-Demand: Melbourne Pilot Simulation Study , 2017 .

[8]  Ralf Risser,et al.  Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Åse Svensson,et al.  A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective , 1998 .

[11]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[12]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Using the Driving Behavior of an Automated Vehicle to Communicate Intentions - A Wizard of Oz Study , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[13]  John D. Lee,et al.  Proxemics and Kinesics in Automated Vehicle–Pedestrian Communication: Representing Ethnographic Observations , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[14]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Understanding interactions between Automated Road Transport Systems and other road users: A video analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[15]  Viola Cavallo,et al.  The effects of age and traffic density on street-crossing behavior. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Masooda Bashir,et al.  Trust in Automation , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Tanja Fuest,et al.  Crossing the Street Across the Globe: A Study on the Effects of eHMI on Pedestrians in the US, Germany and China , 2019, HCI.

[18]  U. Lachapelle,et al.  "Outta my way!" Individual and environmental correlates of interactions between pedestrians and vehicles during street crossings. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Mette Møller,et al.  Young drivers' perception of adult and child pedestrians in potential street-crossing situations. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Björn Johansson,et al.  Driver coordination in complex traffic environments , 2006, ECCE '06.

[21]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Modeling Cooperative Lane Changing and Forced Merging Behavior , 2007 .

[22]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  Pre-Crash Scenario Typology for Crash Avoidance Research , 2007 .

[23]  Pushpa Choudhary,et al.  Modelling driver distraction effects due to mobile phone use on reaction time , 2017 .

[24]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  The Right Moment for Braking as Informal Communication Signal Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians in Crossing Situations , 2017 .

[25]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Game theory - Analysis of Conflict , 1991 .

[26]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: design considerations based on human needs and expectations , 2018, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[27]  Rune Elvik,et al.  A review of game-theoretic models of road user behaviour. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  W. R. Ford,et al.  Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human-human online conversations and human-chatbot conversations , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  R. Bshary,et al.  Distinguishing four fundamental approaches to the evolution of helping , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[30]  Natasha Merat,et al.  What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Anca D. Dragan,et al.  Planning for cars that coordinate with people: leveraging effects on human actions for planning and active information gathering over human internal state , 2018, Autonomous Robots.

[32]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Taxonomy of Traffic Situations for the Interaction between Automated Vehicles and Human Road Users , 2017 .

[33]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Agreeing to cross: How drivers and pedestrians communicate , 2017, 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[34]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Human Sensorimotor Communication: A Theory of Signaling in Online Social Interactions , 2013, PloS one.

[35]  Nobuyuki Uchida,et al.  Driver behavior in car-to-pedestrian incidents: An application of the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method (DREAM). , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Fatal intersection crashes in Norway: patterns in contributing factors and data collection challenges. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Javier Alonso-Mora,et al.  Social behavior for autonomous vehicles , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Sowmya Somanath,et al.  Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction , 2018, CHI.

[39]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[40]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Cognitive—Motor Interference in an Ecologically Valid Street Crossing Scenario , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[41]  Andrew P Tarko,et al.  Use of crash surrogates and exceedance statistics to estimate road safety. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Models of Human Decision-Making as Tools for Estimating and Optimizing Impacts of Vehicle Automation , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[43]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  A pedestrian’s stare and drivers’ stopping behavior: A field experiment at the pedestrian crossing , 2015 .

[44]  Nikolaos Mavridis,et al.  A review of verbal and non-verbal human-robot interactive communication , 2014, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[45]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  The Trouble with Autopilots: Assisted and Autonomous Driving on the Social Road , 2017, CHI.

[46]  Lorenza Mondada,et al.  Crossing the street: How pedestrians interact with cars , 2019, Language & Communication.

[47]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Autonomous Vehicles That Interact With Pedestrians: A Survey of Theory and Practice , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[48]  Matthias Beggiato,et al.  An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[49]  Mirka Rauniomaa,et al.  Interaction Between Road Users , 2014 .

[50]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Pedestrians, Autonomous Vehicles, and Cities , 2016 .

[51]  Nicolas Marmaras,et al.  Drivers' communicative interactions: on-road observations and modelling for integration in future automation systems , 2014, Ergonomics.

[52]  Melissa Cefkin,et al.  Multi-methods Research to Examine External HMI for Highly Automated Vehicles , 2019, HCI.

[53]  Yee Mun Lee,et al.  The effect of motion and signalling on drivers' ability to predict intentions of other road users. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[54]  Adrian Brügger,et al.  Actions speak louder than words: The benefits of ethical behaviors of leaders. , 2010 .

[55]  Mathias Broth,et al.  On the road: Communicating traffic , 2019, Language & Communication.

[56]  Alex Fridman,et al.  To Walk or Not to Walk: Crowdsourced Assessment of External Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Displays , 2017, ArXiv.

[57]  Nick Hounsell,et al.  Public Views towards Implementation of Automated Vehicles in Urban Areas , 2016 .

[58]  J. Cremer,et al.  Children's Road Crossing , 2007, Current directions in psychological science.

[59]  Anthony D. McDonald,et al.  Crash Themes in Automated Vehicles: A Topic Modeling Analysis of the California Department of Motor Vehicles Automated Vehicle Crash Database , 2020, 2001.11087.

[60]  Natasha Merat,et al.  When Should the Chicken Cross the Road? - Game Theory for Autonomous Vehicle - Human Interactions , 2018, VEHITS.

[61]  Riender Happee,et al.  External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions , 2019, Hum. Factors.

[62]  Søren Kristiansen,et al.  Goffman's Sociology of Everyday Life Interaction , 2015 .

[63]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).