Egrets of a Feather Flock Together

Group foraging and colonial formation in avian species are examined with an artificial life (alife) model using genetic algorithms (GA) and neural networks. Horn's classical model predicts that colonial birds are more successful than territorial ones in a patchy resource environment, and the reverse is true when resources are evenly distributed. The weak point of the model is confusion between colony formation and flock foraging and implicit assumption of perfect knowledge of resource distribution by foraging birds. The authors made an alife model that realized both flock foraging and colonial formation simultaneously during evolution in a patchy environment. The reference organisms were egrets, which make colonial nests in the breeding season and colonial roosts in the nonbreeding season. In the computer model, artificial egrets used the presence of other egrets as an indicator to locate resource-rich patches in a resource-clumped environment. On the contrary, egrets were less reliant on other individuals as a source of foraging information in evenly distributed resource conditions. Colonial nesting was also induced only in a patchy environment where the foraging efficiency was always higher than the evenly distributed condition. Local enhancement played an important role in achieving colonial and flock foraging.

[1]  Bennett G. Galef Information centres of norway rats: sites for information exchange and information parasitism , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Jennifer R. Ovenden,et al.  Genetic-Evidence for Philopatry in a Colonially Nesting Seabird, the Fairy Prion (Pachyptila-Turtur) , 1991 .

[3]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .

[4]  Charles R. Brown,et al.  Social foraging in cliff swallows: local enhancement, risk sensitivity, competition and the avoidance of predators , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  M J Wade,et al.  Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure , 1987 .

[7]  James P. Gibbs,et al.  Spatial Relationships between Nesting Colonies and Foraging Areas of Great Blue Herons , 1991 .

[8]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  H. Richner,et al.  Evolution of avian roosting behaviour: a test of the information centre hypothesis and of a critical assumption , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Determinants of great blue heron colony distribution in coastal Maine , 1987 .

[11]  David H. Ackley,et al.  Interactions between learning and evolution , 1991 .

[12]  D. Scott The feeding success of cattle egrets in flocks , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Thomas S. Ray,et al.  An Approach to the Synthesis of Life , 1991 .

[14]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[15]  H. S. Horn,et al.  The Adaptive Significance of Colonial Nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird (Euphagus Cyanocephalus) , 1968 .

[16]  Donald F. Caccamise,et al.  Avian Communal Roosting: Implications of Diurnal Activity Centers , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[17]  W. Thorpe Learning and instinct in animals , 1956 .

[18]  Daniel I. Rubenstein,et al.  On Predation, Competition, and the Advantages of Group Living , 1978 .

[19]  Craig Packer,et al.  Should co-operative groups be more vigilant than selfish groups? , 1990 .

[20]  J. Krebs,et al.  The Survival Value of Flocking in Birds: A Simulation Model , 1974 .

[21]  D. K. Cairns,et al.  The Regulation of Seabird Colony Size: A Hinterland Model , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[22]  B. Stutchbury,et al.  Choice of colony size in birds. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  T. Valone Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation , 1989 .

[24]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Evolutionary phenomena in simple dynamics , 1992 .

[25]  D. Clode,et al.  Colonially breeding seabirds: Predators or prey? , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Coevolution to the edge of chaos: coupled fitness landscapes, poised states, and coevolutionary avalanches. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Frank Ball,et al.  A model for territory and group formation in a heterogeneous habitat , 1991 .

[28]  L. Marion,et al.  Territorial feeding and colonial breeding are not mutually exclusive: the case of the grey heron (Ardea cinerea) , 1989 .

[29]  D. Mock,et al.  Falsifiability and the Information Centre Hypothesis , 1988 .

[30]  W. F. Wolff An individual-oriented model of a wading bird nesting colony , 1994 .

[31]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Patch Information and Estimation: A Cost of Group Foraging , 1993 .

[32]  H. Pulliam,et al.  On the advantages of flocking. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[34]  Charles R. Brown,et al.  Enhanced Foraging Efficiency Through Information Centers: A Benefit of Coloniality in Cliff Swallows , 1988 .

[35]  J. G. Ollason,et al.  Learning to forage in a regenerating patchy environment: Can it fail to be optimal? , 1987 .

[36]  George V. N. Powell,et al.  Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging , 1974 .

[37]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Nest Placement Relative to Food and Its Influence on the Evolution of Avian Coloniality , 1992, The American Naturalist.