Modeling Assumptions Clash with the Real World: Transparency, Equity, and Community Challenges for Student Assignment Algorithms
暂无分享,去创建一个
Samantha Robertson | Tonya Nguyen | Niloufar Salehi | Niloufar Salehi | Samantha Robertson | Tonya Nguyen
[1] Karla A. Badillo-Urquiola,et al. A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms used within the U.S. Child Welfare System , 2020, CHI.
[2] A. Korolova,et al. Discrimination through Optimization , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..
[3] A. Chouldechova,et al. Toward Algorithmic Accountability in Public Services: A Qualitative Study of Affected Community Perspectives on Algorithmic Decision-making in Child Welfare Services , 2019, CHI.
[4] Noëmi Manders-Huits,et al. What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values into Design , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[5] H. Oosterbeek,et al. Why are Schools Segregated? Evidence from the Secondary-School Match in Amsterdam , 2019 .
[6] Min Kyung Lee,et al. A Human-Centered Approach to Algorithmic Services: Considerations for Fair and Motivating Smart Community Service Management that Allocates Donations to Non-Profit Organizations , 2017, CHI.
[7] Min Kyung Lee. Algorithmic Mediation in Group Decisions: Fairness Perceptions of Algorithmically Mediated vs. Discussion-Based Social Division , 2017, CSCW.
[8] Weng-Keen Wong,et al. Too much, too little, or just right? Ways explanations impact end users' mental models , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing.
[9] Justine S. Hastings,et al. Heterogeneous Preferences and the Efficacy of Public School Choice , 2008 .
[10] Yan Chen,et al. Information acquisition and provision in school choice: An experimental study , 2021, J. Econ. Theory.
[11] A. Rees-Jones,et al. An experimental investigation of preference misrepresentation in the residency match , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[12] M. Laverde. Unequal Assignments to Public Schools and the Limits of School Choice* , 2020 .
[13] Eve L. Ewing. Ghosts in the Schoolyard: Racism and School Closings on Chicago's South Side , 2018 .
[14] P. H. Kahn,et al. Human values, ethics, and design , 2002 .
[15] Aaron Halfaker,et al. Keeping Community in the Loop: Understanding Wikipedia Stakeholder Values for Machine Learning-Based Systems , 2020, CHI.
[16] Alexandra Chouldechova,et al. Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments , 2016, Big Data.
[17] Susan Wyche,et al. Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery , 2009, CHI.
[18] Eric Ps Baumer,et al. Toward human-centered algorithm design , 2017 .
[19] Janelle T. Scott,et al. School Choice and the Empowerment Imperative , 2013 .
[20] Noam Nisan,et al. Matching for the Israeli "Mechinot" Gap-Year Programs: Handling Rich Diversity Requirements , 2019, EC.
[21] Pablo Guillen,et al. Lying through Their Teeth: Third Party Advice and Truth Telling in a Strategy Proof Mechanism , 2014 .
[22] Sasha Costanza-Chock. Design Justice: Towards an Intersectional Feminist Framework for Design Theory and Practice , 2018, DRS2018: Catalyst.
[23] Isa Emin Hafalir,et al. Effective affirmative action in school choice , 2011 .
[24] Danah Boyd,et al. Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems , 2019, FAT.
[25] Timnit Gebru,et al. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification , 2018, FAT.
[26] D. Fitch,et al. Review of "Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism," by Noble, S. U. (2018). New York, New York: NYU Press. , 2018, CDQR.
[27] G. Box. Robustness in the Strategy of Scientific Model Building. , 1979 .
[28] Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al. School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach , 2003 .
[29] Zoë Hitzig. The normative gap: mechanism design and ideal theories of justice , 2019, Economics and Philosophy.
[30] Janelle T. Scott,et al. Market-Driven Education Reform and the Racial Politics of Advocacy , 2011 .
[31] Ian Alexander,et al. An introduction to qualitative research , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[32] Tingting Ding,et al. Learning and Mechanism Design: An Experimental Test of School Matching Mechanisms with Intergenerational Advice , 2019, The Economic Journal.
[33] A. Vignoles,et al. What Parents Want: School Preferences and School Choice , 2015 .
[34] H. Nissenbaum. A Contextual Approach to Privacy Online , 2011, Daedalus.
[35] Avinatan Hassidim,et al. "Strategic" Behavior in a Strategy-proof Environment , 2016, EC.
[36] Andrew Schotter,et al. Matching and chatting: An experimental study of the impact of network communication on school-matching mechanisms , 2017, Games Econ. Behav..
[37] L. Shapley,et al. On cores and indivisibility , 1974 .
[38] P S BaumerEric,et al. Who is the "Human" in Human-Centered Machine Learning , 2019 .
[39] Pablo Guillén,et al. The effectiveness of top-down advice in strategy-proof mechanisms: A field experiment , 2018 .
[40] Morgan G. Ames. Learning consumption: Media, literacy, and the legacy of One Laptop per Child , 2016, Inf. Soc..
[41] Janet Davis,et al. Value Sensitive Design: Applications, Adaptations, and Critiques , 2013 .
[42] L. S. Shapley,et al. College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..
[43] Alan Borning,et al. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.
[44] Lynn Dombrowski,et al. Shared values/conflicting logics: working around e-government systems , 2014, CHI.
[45] Pablo Guillén,et al. Not quite the best response: truth-telling, strategy-proof matching, and the manipulation of others , 2017 .
[46] Haiyi Zhu,et al. Explaining Decision-Making Algorithms through UI: Strategies to Help Non-Expert Stakeholders , 2019, CHI.
[47] Adam Tauman Kalai,et al. Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings , 2016, NIPS.
[48] Marzyeh Ghassemi,et al. A Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Machine Learning for Health. , 2020, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.
[49] Adam J. Kapor,et al. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HETEROGENEOUS BELIEFS AND SCHOOL CHOICE MECHANISMS , 2019 .
[50] Alan Borning,et al. Next steps for value sensitive design , 2012, CHI.
[51] Latanya Sweeney,et al. Discrimination in online ad delivery , 2013, CACM.
[52] Parag A. Pathak,et al. What Really Matters in Designing School Choice Mechanisms , 2017 .
[53] M. Kenward,et al. An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .
[54] Rakesh V. Vohra,et al. Stable Matching with Proportionality Constraints , 2017, EC.
[55] S. Glazerman,et al. Market Signals: Evidence on the Determinants and Consequences of School Choice From a Citywide Lottery , 2016 .
[56] Yoan Hermstrüwer. Transparency and Fairness in School Choice Mechanisms , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[57] Joana Pais,et al. School choice and information: An experimental study on matching mechanisms , 2008, Games Econ. Behav..
[58] Helen Nissenbaum,et al. Values at play: design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design , 2005, CHI.
[59] Adam J. Kapor,et al. Heterogeneous Beliefs and School Choice Mechanisms , 2020 .
[60] E. Ostrom,et al. The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.
[61] Alan Borning,et al. A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods , 2018, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..
[62] Brian W. Powers,et al. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations , 2019, Science.
[63] Kate Crawford,et al. Can an Algorithm be Agonistic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics , 2016 .