The role of information in multiagent coordination

The goal in networked control of multiagent systems is to derive desirable collective behavior through the design of local control algorithms. The information available to the individual agents, either attained through communication or sensing, invariably defines the space of admissible control laws. Hence, informational restrictions impose constraints on achievable performance guarantees. This paper provides one such constraint with regard to the efficiency of the resulting stable solutions for a class of networked resource allocation problems with submodular objective functions. When the agents have full information regarding the mission space, the efficiency of the resulting stable solutions is guaranteed to be within 50% of optimal. However, when the agents have only localized information about the mission space, which is a common feature of many well-studied control designs, the efficiency of the resulting stable solutions can be 1=n of optimal, where n is the number of agents. Consequently, in general such schemes cannot guarantee that systems comprised of n agents can perform any better than a system comprised of a single agent for identical environmental conditions. The last part of this paper highlights an algorithm that overcomes this limitation by allowing the agents to communicate minimally with neighboring agents.

[1]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  Connections between cooperative control and potential games illustrated on the consensus problem , 2007, 2007 European Control Conference (ECC).

[3]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Intrinsic Robustness of the Price of Anarchy , 2015, J. ACM.

[5]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Game Theory and Distributed Control , 2015 .

[6]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Near-optimal Observation Selection using Submodular Functions , 2007, AAAI.

[7]  Ruggero Carli,et al.  Gossip Coverage Control for Robotic Networks: Dynamical Systems on the Space of Partitions , 2009, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[8]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory , 2007 .

[9]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[10]  F. Bullo,et al.  Motion Coordination with Distributed Information , 2007 .

[11]  Jorge Cortes,et al.  Distributed coverage of nonconvex environments , 2008 .

[12]  Jorge Cortés,et al.  Adaptive Information Collection by Robotic Sensor Networks for Spatial Estimation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  F. Bullo,et al.  On collective motion in sensor networks: sample problems and distributed algorithms , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Decentralized detection by a large number of sensors , 1988, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[15]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Cooperative Control and Potential Games , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[16]  Qiang Du,et al.  Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations: Applications and Algorithms , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[17]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Dynamic Vehicle Routing for Robotic Systems , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Distributed multi-agent optimization with state-dependent communication , 2010, Math. Program..

[19]  Adrian Vetta,et al.  Nash equilibria in competitive societies, with applications to facility location, traffic routing and auctions , 2002, The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings..

[20]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Distributed Welfare Games , 2013, Oper. Res..

[21]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Distributed Algorithms for Environment Partitioning in Mobile Robotic Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[22]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Designing Games for Distributed Optimization , 2013, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process..