Preferred directions of arm movements are independent of visual perception of spatial directions

Directional preferences have previously been demonstrated during horizontal arm movements. These preferences were characterized by a tendency to exploit interaction torques for movement production at the shoulder or elbow, indicating that the preferred directions depend on biomechanical, and not on visual perception-based factors. We directly tested this hypothesis by systematically dissociating visual information from arm biomechanics. Sixteen subjects performed a free-stroke drawing task that required performance of fast strokes from the circle center toward the perimeter, while selecting stroke directions in a random order. Hand position was represented by a cursor displayed in the movement plane. The free-stroke drawing was performed twice, before and after visuomotor adaptation to a 30° clockwise rotation of the perceived hand path. The adaptation was achieved during practicing pointing movements to eight center-out targets. Directional preferences during performance of the free-stroke drawing task were revealed in ten out of the sixteen subjects. The orientation and strength of these preferences were largely the same in both conditions, showing no significant effect of the visuomotor adaptation. In both conditions, the major preferred directions were characterized by higher contribution of interaction torque to net torque at the shoulder as well as by relatively low inertial resistance and the sum of squared shoulder and elbow muscle torques. These results support the hypothesis that directional preferences are largely determined by biomechanical factors. However, this biomechanical effect can decrease or even disappear in some subjects when movements are performed in special conditions, such as the virtual environment used here.

[1]  N. Dounskaia,et al.  Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Y Burnod,et al.  Learning a new visuomotor transformation: error correction and generalization. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  D. W. Scott,et al.  The Mode Tree: A Tool for Visualization of Nonparametric Density Features , 1993 .

[4]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  A. Bowman,et al.  Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis : the kernel approach with S-plus illustrations , 1999 .

[6]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  Control of Human Limb Movements: The Leading Joint Hypothesis and Its Practical Applications , 2010, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[7]  Natalia V Dounskaia,et al.  Directional biases reveal utilization of arm's biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  N. A. Borghese,et al.  Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance and a Perturbation Sensitivity Model for Motor Planning , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Izenman,et al.  Philatelic Mixtures and Multimodal Densities , 1988 .

[11]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[12]  Michael C. Minnotte,et al.  Nonparametric testing of the existence of modes , 1997 .

[13]  H. Cunningham Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  G. E. Stelmach,et al.  Commonalities and differences in control of various drawing movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  The role of intrinsic factors in control of arm movement direction: implications from directional preferences. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Gordon,et al.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  G. Koshland,et al.  General coordination of shoulder, elbow and wrist dynamics during multijoint arm movements , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  J. Gordon,et al.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracy. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  Load emphasizes muscle effort minimization during selection of arm movement direction , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[20]  C. Ghez,et al.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Mark L. Nagurka,et al.  A Suboptimal Trajectory Planning Algorithm for Robotic Manipulators , 1988 .

[22]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  D J Ostry,et al.  Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Catharine Hull A Study of Laterality Test Items , 1936 .

[26]  N. Dounskaia,et al.  The role of vision, speed, and attention in overcoming directional biases during arm movements , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.