Hardware-In-the-Loop Equipment for the Development of an Automatic Perturbator for Clinical Evaluation of Human Balance Control

Nowadays, increasing attention is being paid to techniques aimed at assessing a subject’s ability to maintain or regain control of balance, thus reducing the risk of falls. To this end, posturographic analyses are performed in different clinical settings, both in unperturbed and perturbed conditions. This article presents a new Hardware-In-the-Loop (HIL) equipment designed for the development of an automatic perturbator for postural control analysis, capable of providing controlled mechanical stimulation by means of an impulsive force exerted on a given point of the body. The experimental equipment presented here includes the perturbator and emulates its interaction with both the subject’s body and the operator performing the test. The development of the perturbator and of the entire HIL equipment is described, including component selection, modeling of the entire system, and experimentally verified simulations used to study and define the most appropriate control laws.

[1]  Zrinka Potocanac,et al.  A robotic system for delivering novel real-time, movement dependent perturbations. , 2017, Gait & posture.

[2]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  On making robots understand safety: Embedding injury knowledge into control , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Mehrdad R. Kermani,et al.  Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Safe Human–Robot Interactions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[4]  R. Moe-Nilssen,et al.  Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[5]  W. McIlroy,et al.  Population Differences in Postural Response Strategy Associated with Exposure to a Novel Continuous Perturbation Stimuli: Would Dancers Have Better Balance on a Boat? , 2016, PLoS ONE.

[6]  R. Moe-Nilssen,et al.  Trunk accelerometry as a measure of balance control during quiet standing. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[7]  H. Kooij,et al.  POSTURAL RESPONSES EVOKED BY PLATFORM PERTUBATIONS ARE DOMINATED BY CONTINUOUS FEEDBACK , 2007 .

[8]  C. Patten,et al.  An Accelerometry-Based System for the Assessment of Balance and Postural Sway , 1997, Gerontology.

[9]  J. Colebatch,et al.  Postural responses to anterior and posterior perturbations applied to the upper trunk of standing human subjects , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Ali Forghani,et al.  Short-latency muscle response patterns to multi-directional, unpredictable perturbations to balance applied to the arm are context dependent , 2017, Neuroscience.

[11]  Zrinka Potocanac,et al.  Fast online corrections of tripping responses , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Xiangrong Shen,et al.  Pressure Estimation-Based Robust Force Control of Pneumatic Actuators , 2013 .

[13]  Maury A. Nussbaum,et al.  Neural Control of Posture During Small Magnitude Perturbations: Effects of Aging and Localized Muscle Fatigue , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  Identification of the contribution of the ankle and hip joints to multi-segmental balance control , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  Hermie Hermens,et al.  Standing balance evaluation using a triaxial accelerometer. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[16]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Effects of Impedance Reduction of a Robot for Wrist Rehabilitation on Human Motor Strategies in Healthy Subjects during Pointing Tasks , 2011, Adv. Robotics.

[17]  Lorenzo Sciavicco,et al.  The parallel approach to force/position control of robotic manipulators , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[18]  Carlo Ferraresi,et al.  Pneumo-tronic Perturbator for the Study of Human Postural Responses , 2019, RAAD.

[19]  G. G. Muscolo,et al.  Development of an Automatic Perturbator for Dynamic Posturographic Analysis , 2020 .

[20]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Assessment of the underlying systems involved in standing balance: the additional value of electromyography in system identification and parameter estimation , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  A High Performance Pneumatic Force Actuator System: Part II—Nonlinear Controller Design , 2000 .

[22]  S. Roatta,et al.  Linearity and repeatability of postural responses in relation to peak force and impulse of manually delivered perturbations: a preliminary study , 2020, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[23]  Massimo Bergamasco,et al.  Dynamics Modeling of Human–Machine Control Interface for Underwater Teleoperation , 2020, Robotica.

[24]  M. Latash,et al.  Anticipatory postural adjustments and anticipatory synergy adjustments: preparing to a postural perturbation with predictable and unpredictable direction , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Chul-Seung Kim,et al.  Human postural control against external force perturbation applied to the high-back , 2009 .

[26]  Robert J. Peterka,et al.  Identifying mechanisms of stance control: A single stimulus multiple output model-fit approach , 2018, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Bob-Antoine J. Menelas,et al.  Home-Based Risk of Falling Assessment Test Using a Closed-Loop Balance Model , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  D. Winter,et al.  Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  A. Aruin,et al.  Role of point of application of perturbation in control of vertical posture , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  T.E. Prieto,et al.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Hybrid impedance control of robotic manipulators , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[32]  Carlo Ferraresi,et al.  Hand Rehabilitation Device Actuated by a Pneumatic Muscle , 2018, Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics.

[33]  Martin Levesley,et al.  Impedance control for a pneumatic robot-based around pole-placement, joint space controllers , 2005 .

[34]  Kyoungchul Kong,et al.  Frequency-Shaped Impedance Control for Safe Human–Robot Interaction in Reference Tracking Application , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[35]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  An adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  Robert B. McGhee,et al.  On the Role of Dynamic Models in Quantitative Posturography , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Linhong Ji,et al.  Dynamic Modeling and Interactive Performance of PARM: A Parallel Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Using Impedance Control for Patients after Stroke , 2018, Journal of healthcare engineering.

[38]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Tracking control of non-linear systems using sliding surfaces with application to robot manipulators , 1983 .

[39]  A. Aruin,et al.  Older adults utilize less efficient postural control when performing pushing task. , 2015, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[40]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Human-Intent Detection and Physically Interactive Control of a Robot Without Force Sensors , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[41]  Bing Chen,et al.  Control of grip force and vertical posture while holding an object and being perturbed , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural feedback responses scale with biomechanical constraints in human standing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  D. B. Coelho,et al.  Light touch modulates balance recovery following perturbation: from fast response to stance restabilization , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Bruce Walker,et al.  The test-retest reliability of centre of pressure measures in bipedal static task conditions--a systematic review of the literature. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[45]  F. Horak,et al.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.