Sparse Coding Models Can Exhibit Decreasing Sparseness while Learning Sparse Codes for Natural Images

The sparse coding hypothesis has enjoyed much success in predicting response properties of simple cells in primary visual cortex (V1) based solely on the statistics of natural scenes. In typical sparse coding models, model neuron activities and receptive fields are optimized to accurately represent input stimuli using the least amount of neural activity. As these networks develop to represent a given class of stimulus, the receptive fields are refined so that they capture the most important stimulus features. Intuitively, this is expected to result in sparser network activity over time. Recent experiments, however, show that stimulus-evoked activity in ferret V1 becomes less sparse during development, presenting an apparent challenge to the sparse coding hypothesis. Here we demonstrate that some sparse coding models, such as those employing homeostatic mechanisms on neural firing rates, can exhibit decreasing sparseness during learning, while still achieving good agreement with mature V1 receptive field shapes and a reasonably sparse mature network state. We conclude that observed developmental trends do not rule out sparseness as a principle of neural coding per se: a mature network can perform sparse coding even if sparseness decreases somewhat during development. To make comparisons between model and physiological receptive fields, we introduce a new nonparametric method for comparing receptive field shapes using image registration techniques.

[1]  T. Hromádka,et al.  Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[2]  G. Turrigiano Too many cooks? Intrinsic and synaptic homeostatic mechanisms in cortical circuit refinement. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  Laurent U. Perrinet,et al.  Role of Homeostasis in Learning Sparse Representations , 2007, Neural Computation.

[4]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  Leonard E. White,et al.  Vision and Cortical Map Development , 2007, Neuron.

[6]  T. J. Sullivan,et al.  Homeostatic synaptic scaling in self-organizing maps , 2006, Neural Networks.

[7]  József Fiser,et al.  Spontaneous Cortical Activity Reveals Hallmarks of an Optimal Internal Model of the Environment , 2011, Science.

[8]  Michel Imbert,et al.  Receptive field characteristics and plastic properties of visual cortical cells in kittens reared with or without visual experience , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Learning real and complex overcomplete representations from the statistics of natural images , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[10]  L. Maffei,et al.  Functional postnatal development of the rat primary visual cortex and the role of visual experience: Dark rearing and monocular deprivation , 1994, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  The development of direction selectivity in ferret visual cortex requires early visual experience , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Joel Zylberberg,et al.  Inhibitory Interneurons Decorrelate Excitatory Cells to Drive Sparse Code Formation in a Spiking Model of V1 , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  The Role of Constraints in Hebbian Learning , 1994, Neural Computation.

[14]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  What determines the capacity of autoassociative memories in the brain? Network , 1991 .

[15]  Matthew R. Krause,et al.  Synaptic and Network Mechanisms of Sparse and Reliable Visual Cortical Activity during Nonclassical Receptive Field Stimulation , 2010, Neuron.

[16]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[17]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Characterizing the sparseness of neural codes , 2001, Network.

[18]  Nicole L. Carlson,et al.  Sparse Codes for Speech Predict Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields in the Inferior Colliculus , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.

[20]  D. Ringach Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Martin Rehn,et al.  A network that uses few active neurones to code visual input predicts the diverse shapes of cortical receptive fields , 2007, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  The Sparseness of Neuronal Responses in Ferret Primary Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulation of the Nonclassical Receptive Field Increases Information Transmission Efficiency in V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  L. Abbott,et al.  Responses of neurons in primary and inferior temporal visual cortices to natural scenes , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  A Hein,et al.  Cats reared in stroboscopic illumination: effects on receptive fields in visual cortex. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[29]  Jörg Lücke,et al.  The Maximal Causes of Natural Scenes are Edge Filters , 2010, NIPS.

[30]  Nathalie L Rochefort,et al.  Sparsification of neuronal activity in the visual cortex at eye-opening , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  E. Marder,et al.  Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  József Fiser,et al.  No evidence for active sparsification in the visual cortex , 2009, NIPS.

[33]  Michael Robert DeWeese,et al.  A Sparse Coding Model with Synaptically Local Plasticity and Spiking Neurons Can Account for the Diverse Shapes of V1 Simple Cell Receptive Fields , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..