Effects of Trajectory Resolution on Human Intent Inference

Real-world human intent inference tasks are often performed online and demand high computational tractability. Human trajectories, on which intent inference algorithms rely, are thus approximated via discretized waypoints at a resolution of the designer's choice. The key contribution of this work is to investigate the effects of this trajectory resolution on the efficacy of intent inference algorithms. First, a Bayesian goal inference algorithm is formalized from an action-based perspective, and a novel method for discerning non-intentional motion is presented. Based on these frameworks, it is hypothesized that higher resolution trajectory representations enable better results for both goal and intentionality inference in near-optimal and noisy regimes. Finally, an experiment using human-generated trajectories was conducted to justify these claims.

[1]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Planning-based prediction for pedestrians , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  D. Dennett The Intentional Stance. , 1987 .

[3]  Chris L. Baker,et al.  Goal Inference as Inverse Planning , 2007 .

[4]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Discerning intentions in dynamic human action , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Legibility and predictability of robot motion , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[7]  Ella M. Atkins,et al.  Human Intent Prediction Using Markov Decision Processes , 2012, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Brenna Argall,et al.  Mode Switch Assistance To Maximize Human Intent Disambiguation , 2017, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[9]  Eyal Amir,et al.  Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning , 2007, IJCAI.

[10]  N. Accornero,et al.  Fast complex arm movements in Parkinson's disease. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  Song-Chun Zhu,et al.  Modeling and Inferring Human Intents and Latent Functional Objects for Trajectory Prediction , 2016, ArXiv.

[12]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning , 2008, AAAI.

[13]  Daniele Fontanelli,et al.  Walking Ahead: The Headed Social Force Model , 2017, PloS one.

[14]  Anca D. Dragan,et al.  Planning for Autonomous Cars that Leverage Effects on Human Actions , 2016, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[15]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  Real-Time Predictive Modeling and Robust Avoidance of Pedestrians with Uncertain, Changing Intentions , 2014, WAFR.

[16]  Ross A. Knepper,et al.  Social Momentum: A Framework for Legible Navigation in Dynamic Multi-Agent Environments , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  Monica N. Nicolescu,et al.  Understanding human intentions via Hidden Markov Models in autonomous mobile robots , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  Jean-Paul Laumond,et al.  From human to humanoid locomotion—an inverse optimal control approach , 2010, Auton. Robots.