MOTES SENSOR NETWORKS IN DYNAMIC SCENARIOS: A PERFORMANCE STUDY FOR PERVASIVE APPLICATIONS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS

Recent works have shown that using mobile elements (or data MULEs) to collect and carry data from sensor networks to a collection point may have significant advantages over traditional ad hoc sensor networks. Previous papers on the MULE architecture are mainly based on simulation and numerical analysis. In this paper we investigate the performance of the data MULE model and its ability to support sensorbased applications in a real urban environment by means of an experimental analysis. Specifically, we use a testbed based on Berkeley motes, and analyze the impact of several parameters (i.e., MULE’s speed, distance between the static node and the MULE, duty cycle) on the contact time and the total amount of data that a static node is able to transfer to the mobile MULE when they happen to get in contact. The results obtained are very promising and show that the MULE architecture is really suitable for a large set of sensor-based applications in urban environments, both in low and high mobility scenarios.

[1]  Mineo Takai,et al.  Effects of wireless physical layer modeling in mobile ad hoc networks , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[2]  Christian F. Tschudin,et al.  The gray zone problem in IEEE 802.11b based ad hoc networks , 2002, MOCO.

[3]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  Performance measurements of motes sensor networks , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[4]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  Exploiting Mobility for Energy Efficient Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, Mob. Networks Appl..

[5]  David E. Culler,et al.  TOSSIM: accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications , 2003, SenSys '03.

[6]  Ellen W. Zegura,et al.  A message ferrying approach for data delivery in sparse mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, MobiHoc '04.

[7]  Jason Liu,et al.  Outdoor experimental comparison of four ad hoc routing algorithms , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[8]  Chang-Gun Lee,et al.  Partitioning based mobile element scheduling in wireless sensor networks , 2005, 2005 Second Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2005. IEEE SECON 2005..

[9]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Multiple Controlled Mobile Elements (Data Mules) for Data Collection in Sensor Networks , 2005, DCOSS.

[10]  Gang Zhou,et al.  Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks , 2004, MobiSys '04.

[11]  Patrick Thiran,et al.  Connectivity in ad-hoc and hybrid networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[12]  Waylon Brunette,et al.  Data MULEs: modeling and analysis of a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[13]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Connecting the Physical World with Pervasive Networks , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[14]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Intelligent fluid infrastructure for embedded networks , 2004, MobiSys '04.

[15]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Mobile element scheduling for efficient data collection in wireless sensor networks with dynamic deadlines , 2004, 25th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium.

[16]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  Motes Sensor Networks in Dynamic Scenarios: An Experimental Study for Pervasive Applications in Urban Environments , 2007 .

[17]  Ashutosh Sabharwal,et al.  Using Predictable Observer Mobility for Power Efficient Design of Sensor Networks , 2003, IPSN.

[18]  David E. Culler,et al.  Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks , 2004, SenSys '04.