Experience Shapes the Utility of Natural Statistics for Perceptual Contour Integration

Segmenting meaningful targets from cluttered scenes is a fundamental function of the visual system. Evolution and development have been suggested to optimize the brain's solution to this computationally challenging task by tuning the visual system to features that co-occur frequently in natural scenes (e.g., collinear edges) [1, 2, 3]. However, the role of shorter-term experience in shaping the utility of scene statistics remains largely unknown. Here, we ask whether collinearity is a specialized case, or whether the brain can learn to recruit any image regularity for the purpose of target identification. Consistent with long-term optimization for typical scene statistics, observers were better at detecting collinear contours than configurations of elements oriented at orthogonal or acute angles to the contour path. However, training resulted in improved detection of orthogonal contours that lasted for several months, suggesting retuning rather than transient changes of visual sensitivity. Improvement was also observed for acute contours but only after longer training. These results demonstrate that the brain flexibly exploits image regularities and learns to use discontinuities typically associated with surface boundaries (orthogonal, acute alignments) for contour linking and target identification. Thus, short-term experience in adulthood shapes the interpretation of scenes by assigning new statistical utility to image regularities.

[1]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[2]  N. Krüger,et al.  Multi-modal estimation of collinearity and parallelism in natural image sequences , 2002, Network.

[3]  Robert A Jacobs,et al.  Comparing perceptual learning tasks: a review. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[4]  D. Tanné,et al.  Perceptual learning: learning to see , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  Wendy J. Adams,et al.  Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Field,et al.  Integration of contours: new insights , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  Roelfsema Pieter Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping , 2008 .

[9]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[10]  Mauro Ursino,et al.  A model of contextual interactions and contour detection in primary visual cortex , 2004, Neural Networks.

[11]  C. Gilbert,et al.  On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Zhaoping Li,et al.  A Neural Model of Contour Integration in the Primary Visual Cortex , 1998, Neural Computation.

[13]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[14]  C. Furmanski,et al.  Perceptual learning in object recognition: object specificity and size invariance , 2000, Vision Research.

[15]  Y. Sugita Global plasticity in adult visual cortex following reversal of visual input , 1996, Nature.

[16]  L. Finkel,et al.  Extraction of perceptually salient contours by striate cortical networks , 1998, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Elder,et al.  Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[18]  Heather J. Chisum,et al.  The contribution of vertical and horizontal connections to the receptive field center and surround in V1 , 2004, Neural Networks.

[19]  A. B. Sekuler,et al.  Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning , 1999, Nature.

[20]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Grouping local orientation and direction signals to extract spatial contours: Empirical tests of “association field” models of contour integration , 2005, Vision Research.

[21]  I. Kovács,et al.  Late maturation of visual spatial integration in humans. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Eckstein,et al.  Perceptual learning through optimization of attentional weighting: human versus optimal Bayesian learner. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[23]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Learning increases stimulus salience in anterior inferior temporal cortex of the macaque. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Roger W Li,et al.  Perceptual learning improves efficiency by re-tuning the decision 'template' for position discrimination , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Gilbert,et al.  The Neural Basis of Perceptual Learning , 2001, Neuron.

[28]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to Link Visual Contours , 2008, Neuron.

[29]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to find a shape , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.

[32]  E. Peli,et al.  Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity , 2003, Vision Research.

[33]  C. Gilbert Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics , 1992, Neuron.

[34]  M. Fahle Perceptual learning: a case for early selection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[35]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  D. Fitzpatrick Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  K. Clark CONDITIONS FOR VERSATILE LEARNING , HELMHOLTZ ’ S UNCONSCIOUS INFERENCE , AND THE TASK OF PERCEPTION , 2002 .

[38]  W. Geisler Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Impoverished second-order input to global linking in human vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[40]  A. Angelucci,et al.  Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[41]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[42]  Z L Lu,et al.  Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Wu Li,et al.  Global contour saliency and local colinear interactions. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[45]  S. Appelle Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  N. Krüger,et al.  Multi-modal estimation of collinearity and parallelism in natural image sequences. , 2002 .

[47]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[48]  Daniel Kersten,et al.  Bootstrapped learning of novel objects. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[49]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  S. Dakin,et al.  Snakes and ladders: the role of temporal modulation in visual contour integration , 2001, Vision Research.