The distinctiveness, detectability, and robustness of local image features

We introduce a new method that characterizes typical local image features (e.g., SIFT, phase feature) in terms of their distinctiveness, detectability, and robustness to image deformations. This is useful for the task of classifying local image features in terms of those three properties. The importance of this classification process for a recognition system using local features is as follows: a) reduce the recognition time due to a smaller number of features present in the test image and in the database of model features; b) improve the recognition accuracy since only the most useful features for the recognition task are kept in the model database; and c) increase the scalability of the recognition system given the smaller number of features per model. A discriminant classifier is trained to select well behaved feature points. A regression network is then trained to provide quantitative models of the detection distributions for each selected feature point. It is important to note that both the classifier and the regression network use image data alone as their input. Experimental results show that the use of these trained networks not only improves the performance of our recognition system, but it also significantly reduces the computation time for the recognition process.

[1]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Multi-scale phase-based local features , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[2]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[3]  Randal C. Nelson Memory-Based Recognition for 3-D Objects , 1996 .

[4]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Selection of scale-invariant parts for object class recognition , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[5]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Design and Use of Steerable Filters , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Dan Roth,et al.  Learning a Sparse Representation for Object Detection , 2002, ECCV.

[7]  Katsushi Ikeuchi,et al.  Detectability, Uniqueness, and Reliability of Eigen Windows for Stable Verification of Partially Occluded Objects , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Yali Amit,et al.  A Computational Model for Visual Selection , 1999, Neural Computation.

[9]  Gregory Dudek,et al.  Learning Generative Models of Scene Features , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Probabilistic Models of Appearance for 3-D Object Recognition , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Phase-Based Local Features , 2002, ECCV.

[12]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  A. Jepson,et al.  Flexible spatial models for grouping local image features , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[14]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Models for Recognition , 2000, ECCV.

[15]  Philip H. S. Torr,et al.  The Development and Comparison of Robust Methods for Estimating the Fundamental Matrix , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  High-level and generic models for visual search: When does high level knowledge help? , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).