Acquisition of knowledge about uncertainty in the outcome of sensory motor decision tasks

Recent years have seen a growing number of experiments in which decision making is studied in the context of visuo-motor decision tasks. In these visuo-motor experiments, the outcome of a hand or eye movement is associated with explicit gains and losses (see, e.g. [1]). The results obtained from these studies indicate that human participants typically select surprisingly efficient strategies that come close to maximizing expected gain. For example, under conditions in which the end point variance of speeded hand movements is artificially increased by perturbing the final finger position, humans quickly generate a representation of their modified end point variance and rely on this representation in planning their movements so as to maximize gain [2]. Furthermore, human subjects have been found to implicitly learn the stochasticity of spatially stochastic rewards and losses in only a few hundred trials [3]. These results indicate that humans are able to implicitly estimate the parameters of noisy movement outcomes and of stochastic environmental variables and can use this knowledge to plan their hand movements such as to maximize expected gain. A comparison of performance across these tasks indicates that knowledge about movement uncertainty is learnt within fewer trials than knowledge about the uncertainty in the final target position. This suggests that visual feedback about the hand position is processed and integrated by different mechanisms than visual information about the final target position.

[1]  M. Landy,et al.  Humans Rapidly Estimate Expected Gain in Movement Planning , 2006, Psychological science.

[2]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Yasmin L. Hashambhoy,et al.  Neural Correlates of Reach Errors , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Brian C. McCann,et al.  Learning Stochastic Reward Distributions in a Speeded Pointing Task , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Combining Priors and Noisy Visual Cues in a Rapid Pointing Task , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[7]  George E Stelmach,et al.  Effects of target height and width on 2D pointing movement duration and kinematics. , 2003, Motor control.

[8]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[10]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Optimal Compensation for Temporal Uncertainty in Movement Planning , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  R C Miall,et al.  System Identification Applied to a Visuomotor Task: Near-Optimal Human Performance in a Noisy Changing Task , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Ernst,et al.  The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[13]  E. Tolman Purposive behavior in animals and men , 1932 .

[14]  A. Murata,et al.  Extending Fitts' law to a three-dimensional pointing task. , 2001, Human movement science.

[15]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Controlling the statistics of action: obstacle avoidance. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Landy,et al.  Optimal Compensation for Changes in Task-Relevant Movement Variability , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance and a Perturbation Sensitivity Model for Motor Planning , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Specificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  R Plamondon,et al.  Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[23]  T. S. Constantinidis,et al.  Speed-accuracy trade-off in the performance of pointing movements in different directions in two-dimensional space , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Mark Dean,et al.  Trading off speed and accuracy in rapid, goal-directed movements. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[25]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  M. Landy,et al.  Movement planning with probabilistic target information. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[28]  D. Pélisson,et al.  From Eye to Hand: Planning Goal-directed Movements , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[29]  S. Gepshtein,et al.  Optimality of human movement under natural variations of visual-motor uncertainty. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[30]  M. Landy,et al.  Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.