An index for characterization of nanomaterials in biological systems.

In a physiological environment, nanoparticles selectively absorb proteins to form 'nanoparticle-protein coronas', a process governed by molecular interactions between chemical groups on the nanoparticle surfaces and the amino-acid residues of the proteins. Here, we propose a biological surface adsorption index to characterize these interactions by quantifying the competitive adsorption of a set of small molecule probes onto the nanoparticles. The adsorption properties of nanomaterials are assumed to be governed by Coulomb forces, London dispersion, hydrogen-bond acidity and basicity, polarizability and lone-pair electrons. Adsorption coefficients of the probe compounds were measured and used to create a set of nanodescriptors representing the contributions and relative strengths of each molecular interaction. The method successfully predicted the adsorption of various small molecules onto carbon nanotubes, and the nanodescriptors were also measured for 12 other nanomaterials. The biological surface adsorption index nanodescriptors can be used to develop pharmacokinetic and safety assessment models for nanomaterials.

[1]  Sara Linse,et al.  Complete high‐density lipoproteins in nanoparticle corona , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[2]  C. Hansch Quantitative structure-activity relationships and the unnamed science , 1993 .

[3]  Kun Yang,et al.  Competitive sorption of pyrene, phenanthrene, and naphthalene on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  T. Puzyn,et al.  Toward the development of "nano-QSARs": advances and challenges. , 2009, Small.

[5]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external , 2007 .

[6]  Fabrizio Durante,et al.  Copula Theory and Its Applications , 2010 .

[7]  M. Klein,et al.  The nature of DNA-base-carbon-nanotube interactions. , 2010, Small.

[8]  M R Arkin,et al.  Rates of DNA-Mediated Electron Transfer Between Metallointercalators , 1996, Science.

[9]  N. Monteiro-Riviere,et al.  A Novel in-Vitro Technique for Studying Percutaneous Permeation with a Membrane-Coated Fiber and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry: Part I. Performances of the Technique and Determination of the Permeation Rates and Partition Coefficients of Chemical Mixtures , 2003, Pharmaceutical Research.

[10]  Sudipta Seal,et al.  Protein adsorption and cellular uptake of cerium oxide nanoparticles as a function of zeta potential. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[11]  Wei Xu,et al.  Advances and challenges in log analysis , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[12]  M Laird Forrest,et al.  Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity. , 2009, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[13]  Kenneth A. Dawson,et al.  Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Toshio Fujita,et al.  A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure , 2001 .

[15]  Parag Aggarwal,et al.  Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. , 2009, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[16]  Wei Chen,et al.  Adsorption of polar and nonpolar organic chemicals to carbon nanotubes. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  M. Karelson Molecular descriptors in QSAR/QSPR , 2000 .

[18]  Jim E Riviere,et al.  Comparison of quantum dot biodistribution with a blood-flow-limited physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. , 2009, Nano letters.

[19]  K. Dawson,et al.  Detecting Cryptic Epitopes Created by Nanoparticles , 2006, Science's STKE.

[20]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Statistical external validation and consensus modeling: a QSPR case study for Koc prediction. , 2007, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[21]  E. Joner,et al.  Conceivable interactions of biopersistent nanoparticles with food matrix and living systems following from their physicochemical properties , 2008 .

[22]  D. Do,et al.  Adsorption analysis : equilibria and kinetics , 1998 .

[23]  Sara Linse,et al.  Understanding the nanoparticle–protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  C. Hansch,et al.  p-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure , 1964 .

[25]  Michael H. Abraham,et al.  Scales of solute hydrogen-bonding: their construction and application to physicochemical and biochemical processes , 2010 .

[26]  T. Karanfil,et al.  The impacts of aggregation and surface chemistry of carbon nanotubes on the adsorption of synthetic organic compounds. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  J. Dearden,et al.  How not to develop a quantitative structure–activity or structure–property relationship (QSAR/QSPR) , 2009, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[28]  Anna Tsantili-Kakoulidou,et al.  Alternative measures of lipophilicity: from octanol-water partitioning to IAM retention. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[29]  T. Xia,et al.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. , 2009, Nature materials.

[30]  Kun Yang,et al.  Adsorption of organic compounds by carbon nanomaterials in aqueous phase: Polanyi theory and its application. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[31]  Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere,et al.  Mechanisms of quantum dot nanoparticle cellular uptake. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[32]  N. Monteiro-Riviere,et al.  A system coefficient approach for quantitative assessment of the solvent effects on membrane absorption from chemical mixtures , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[33]  Kenneth A. Dawson,et al.  Protein–Nanoparticle Interactions , 2008, Nano-Enabled Medical Applications.