That Avatar Is Looking at Me! Social Inhibition in Virtual Worlds

What effect does controlling an avatar, while in the presence of other virtual agents, have on task performance in virtual worlds? Would the type of view have an influence on this effect? We conducted a study to observe the effects of social inhibition/facilitation traditionally seen in human-to-human interaction. The theory of social inhibition/facilitation states that the presence of others causes people to perform worse on complex tasks and better on simple tasks. Simple tasks are well-learned, easy tasks, while complex tasks require more thought processes to complete the task. Participants interacted in a virtual world through control of an avatar. Using this avatar, they completed both simple and complex math tasks in both 1st person and 3rd person views, either in the presence of another female virtual agent, male agent, or alone. The results from this study show that gender of virtual agents has an effect on real humans' sense of presence in the virtual world. Trends exist for inhibition and facilitation based on the gender of the agent and the view type. We have also identified several challenges in conducting experimental studies in virtual worlds. Our results may have implications on designing for education and training purposes in virtual worlds.

[1]  Jim Blascovich,et al.  A pluralistic explanation of choice shifts on the risk dimension. , 1975 .

[2]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Proteus Effect , 2009, Commun. Res..

[3]  Chris Barker,et al.  An Experiment on Public Speaking Anxiety in Response to Three Different Types of Virtual Audience , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  Bjørn Jæger What educational activities fit virtual worlds: Towards a theoretical evaluation framework , 2009 .

[5]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  The Responses of People to Virtual Humans in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Amy Banic,et al.  Social responses to virtual humans: implications for future interface design , 2007, CHI.

[8]  Jim Blascovich,et al.  Social "facilitation" as challenge and threat. , 1999 .

[9]  Livingston Alexander,et al.  The Development of an Abbreviated Version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale , 1989 .

[10]  Alan Miller,et al.  Virtual worlds, real traffic: interaction and adaptation , 2010, MMSys '10.

[11]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Social Inhibition in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  John Innes,et al.  Social facilitation and social monitoring: A new look at Zajonc's mere presence hypothesis , 1982 .

[13]  Mel Slater,et al.  Collaboration in Tele-Immersive Environments , 2002, EGVE.

[14]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects , 1978 .

[15]  K. Kallinen,et al.  Presence and emotion in computer game players during 1st person vs. 3rd person playing view: evidence from self-report, eye-tracking, and facial muscle activity data , 2007 .

[16]  Stuart E. Middleton,et al.  Interface agents: A review of the field , 2002, ArXiv.

[17]  D. McNamara,et al.  Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society , 2007 .

[18]  N. Triplett,et al.  The Dynamogenic Factors in Pacemaking and Competition , 1898 .

[19]  Qiping Zhang,et al.  A Case Study of Communication and Social Interactions in Learning in Second Life , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  Can a virtual cat persuade you?: the role of gender and realism in speaker persuasiveness , 2006, CHI.

[21]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Daniel C. Cliburn,et al.  Second Life as a Medium for Lecturing in College Courses , 2009 .

[23]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[24]  Byron Reeves,et al.  Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  Eleni Stroulia,et al.  Virtual worlds - past, present, and future: New directions in social computing , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[26]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The Mere Belief of Social Interaction Improves Learning , 2007 .