Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the cerebral response to visual stimulation in medically unexplained visual loss

Background. Medically unexplained visual loss occurs in 1 to 5% of patients attending ophthalmology clinics and for many it runs a chronic course. A psychogenic aetiology is presumed in such cases, but little is known about the underlying neural mechanisms. Recent studies have established the value of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in understanding the mechanisms of unexplained motor and sensory symptoms. The purpose of this study was to use a similar strategy (fMRI) to evaluate the cerebral responses to visual stimulation in a group of patients with medically unexplained visual loss, in an attempt to determine the underlying neural mechanisms. Method. Brain activation induced by periodic (monocular) 8 Hz visual stimulation was detected by fMRI in five patients with unexplained visual loss who fulfilled DSM-IV criteria for conversion disorder, and seven normal volunteers. Between-group differences in mean power of activation were estimated by fitting a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model at each intracerebral voxel in standard space. Results. Compared with controls, patients showed reduced activation in visual cortices, but increased activation in left inferior frontal cortex, left insula-claustrum, bilateral striatum and thalami, left limbic structures, and left posterior cingulate cortex. Conclusions. This preliminary study has identified novel neural correlates in patients with unexplained visual loss. The abnormal pattern of activation may reflect inhibition of primary visual cortex or a shift towards non-conscious (implicit) processing.

[1]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Methods for diagnosis and treatment of stimulus‐correlated motion in generic brain activation studies using fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[2]  G. Høvding,et al.  The prognosis of patients with hysterical visual impairment , 1989, Acta ophthalmologica.

[3]  T. Cox,et al.  Functional visual loss: I. A true psuchiatric disorder? , 1983, Psychological Medicine.

[4]  M. Barris,et al.  Visual impairment in hysteria , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[5]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  Functional neuroanatomical correlates of hysterical sensorimotor loss. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Pattern of neuronal activity associated with conscious and unconscious processing of visual signals. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Kathol,et al.  Functional visual loss: II. Psychiatric aspects in 42 patients followed for 4 years , 1983, Psychological Medicine.

[9]  M. Ron Explaining the unexplained: understanding hysteria. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  S C Williams,et al.  Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a nonparametric approach. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  L. Kostakoglu,et al.  Cerebral blood flow changes in patients with conversion disorder , 1998, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[12]  M. Trimble,et al.  ‘Hysteria’, ‘Functional' or ‘Psychogenic’? a Survey of British Neurologists’ Preferences , 1991, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[13]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Imaging hypnotic paralysis: implications for conversion hysteria , 2000, The Lancet.

[14]  R. B. Post,et al.  The California syndrome. Functional visual complaints with potential economic impact. , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[15]  John Suckling,et al.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  J. Endicott,et al.  A diagnostic interview: the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. , 1978, Archives of general psychiatry.

[17]  T. Paus,et al.  Cerebral Mechanisms of Hypnotic Induction and Suggestion , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  G J Barker,et al.  Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Delusions of alien control in the normal brain , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  R. Barry,et al.  Detection of feigned recognition memory impairment using the old/new effect of the event-related potential. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[22]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[23]  A. Cowey,et al.  Blindsight in man and monkey. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. , 1974, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Some aspects of memory functions and the temporal lobes , 1986, Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[26]  H. S. Thompson,et al.  Functional visual loss. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  The functional anatomy of a hysterical paralysis , 1997, Cognition.

[28]  Sean A Spence,et al.  Discrete neurophysiological correlates in prefrontal cortex during hysterical and feigned disorder of movement , 2000, The Lancet.

[29]  C. Marsden,et al.  Slater revisited: 6 year follow up study of patients with medically unexplained motor symptoms , 1998, BMJ.