Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias

In the case in which all subjects are screened using a common test and only a subset of these subjects are tested using a golden standard test, it is well documented that there is a risk for bias, called verification bias. When the test has only two levels (e.g. positive and negative) and we are trying to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the test, we are actually constructing a confidence interval for a binomial proportion. Since it is well documented that this estimation is not trivial even with complete data, we adopt multiple imputation framework for verification bias problem. We propose several imputation procedures for this problem and compare different methods of estimation. We show that our imputation methods are better than the existing methods with regard to nominal coverage and confidence interval length.

[1]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[2]  D. Rubin,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Interval Estimation from Simple Random Samples with Ignorable Nonresponse , 1986 .

[3]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine , 2002 .

[4]  D. Rubin.  Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years , 1996 .

[5]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias , 1993 .

[6]  V. Marshall,et al.  Diaphanography as a means of detecting breast cancer. , 1984, Radiology.

[7]  Roger A. Sugden,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys , 1988 .

[8]  X.H. Zhou,et al.  Improving interval estimation of binomial proportions , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Logit-Based Interval Estimation for Binomial Data Using the Jeffreys Prior , 1987 .

[10]  Nathaniel Schenker,et al.  Asymptotic results for multiple imputation , 1988 .

[11]  Huiman X Barnhart,et al.  Accounting for Nonignorable Verification Bias in Assessment of Diagnostic Tests , 2003, Biometrics.

[12]  Joseph L Schafer,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 1997 .

[13]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Multiple-Imputation Inferences with Uncongenial Sources of Input , 1994 .

[14]  L. Wasserman,et al.  The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules , 1996 .

[15]  L. Brown,et al.  Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion , 2001 .

[16]  M. Pepe.  The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[17]  R A Greenes,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. , 1983, Biometrics.

[18]  R A Greenes,et al.  Assessment of Diagnostic Technologies: Methodology for Unbiased Estimation from Samples of Selectively Verified Patients , 1985, Investigative radiology.

[19]  D. Drum,et al.  Hepatic scintigraphy in clinical decision making. , 1972, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  W. Wong,et al.  The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation , 1987 .

[21]  A. Agresti,et al.  Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions , 1998 .

[22]  E. B. Wilson.  Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference , 1927 .

[23]  J. Swets,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic technologies. , 1979, Science.