Discontinuous model-based adaptive control for robots executing free and constrained tasks

We propose a robot controller for stably executing all phases of contact tasks involving discontinuities due to the introduction or removal of contact forces. Systems executing such tasks are characterized by ambiguous right hand sides in the differential equations of motion. Consequently, our approach develops upon ideas from generalized dynamical systems (GDSs), an orthogonalization principle, the Hertz contact model, and model-based adaptive control. The result is an asymptotically stable controller that discontinuously switches among three possible configurations based on the contact situation. The method is used to tune the controller independently for both position and constrained motion as also for reducing contact forces during the process of making contact with the environment. The underlying theory is first described. Then the controller synthesis and proof of its asymptotic stability, based on Lyapunov's method, are presented. The idea is illustrated with a simulation of a simple task.<<ETX>>

[1]  Lakmal Seneviratne,et al.  Adaptive Control Of Robot Manipulators , 1992, Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  P. Akella Contact mechanics and the dynamics of manipulation , 1993 .

[3]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Stable execution of contact tasks using impedance control , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  N. H. McClamroch,et al.  Feedback stabilization and tracking of constrained robots , 1988 .

[5]  Yunhui Liu,et al.  Model-based adaptive hybrid control for geometrically constrained robots , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  S. Gutman Uncertain dynamical systems--A Lyapunov min-max approach , 1979 .

[7]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  The use of kinematic redundancy in reducing impact and contact effects in manipulation , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  Experimental verification of a strategy for impact control , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Kamal Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Impact and force control , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Ye-Hwa Chen,et al.  Robust hybrid control of robot manipulators , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Asymptotic Stability for Force Reflecting Teleoperators with Time Delay , 1992 .

[12]  Gianni Ferretti,et al.  Dynamic simulation of robots interacting with stiff contact surfaces , 1992 .

[13]  J. Slotine,et al.  On the Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators , 1987 .

[14]  Kazuo Tanie,et al.  Command sequence replanning using discrete-event-based task model in tele-robotic part mating , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  James K. Mills,et al.  Control of Robotic Manipulators During General Task Execution: A Discontinuous Control Approach , 1993, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  P. Akella,et al.  Scaled bilateral telemanipulation: an experimental investigation of scaling laws , 1995, Other Conferences.

[17]  Tetsuro Yabuta,et al.  Nonlinear basic stability concept of the hybrid position/force control scheme for robot manipulators , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[18]  E. Roxin On generalized dynamical systems defined by contingent equations. , 1965 .

[19]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Contact transition control: an experimental study , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Impact control of grasping (robot manipulators) , 1991 .

[21]  Kosei Kitagaki,et al.  Optimal approach velocity of end-effector to the environment , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  K. Johnson Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .