Girls in IT: intentionally self-excluded or products of high school as a site of exclusion?

The low number of women in the information technology (IT) field is a concern. The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors behind the exclusion of girls from the IT field. The present work includes a narrative literature review and an exploratory interview study with ten girls and six study guidance counsellors (GCs) from Finnish senior high schools. Using the nexus analysis as a theoretical lens, the authors examined the exclusion of girls from IT. Earlier literature directed attention to the cultural norms, assumptions and stereotypes still prevalent in society and the lack of role models and positive media as factors contributing to girls excluding themselves from the IT field. In this research study’s data, the authors not only found evidence of the unintentional exclusion of girls from IT by others but also by the girls themselves. Findings of this research study illustrate the various discourses, actors and their interactions, their background and history-related factors affecting girls' career choices. The novelty of this study is in approaching high school as a site of exclusion, where problematic discourses, interactions and histories come together, reproducing exclusion of girls from the IT field. The authors contribute with a literature review of the research study on gender and IT and the inclusion/exclusion dynamics around IT. Using the nexus analysis, the authors identify the exclusion dynamics in this complex social issue. Several decades of research have shown that the inclusion of women remains low in IT disciplines. In this study, high schools are viewed as sites of exclusion, engendering a prevalent lack of information and education on the field. The authors offer novel insights into the role of curriculum, GCs and online information excluding girls from the IT field.

[1]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Understanding the under representation of women in IT: toward a theory of individual differences , 2004, SIGMIS CPR '04.

[2]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide , 2002, First Monday.

[3]  Phyllis W. Bernt,et al.  Why Women Choose Information Technology Careers: Educational, Social, and Familial Influences , 2002 .

[4]  CarterLori Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science , 2006 .

[5]  Rosalind Gill,et al.  The Gender-Technology Relation , 2018 .

[6]  K. Türk,et al.  Detecting Major Misconceptions about Employment in ICT: A Study of the Myths about ICT Work among Females , 2016 .

[7]  Marianne Kinnula,et al.  The Future Digital Innovators: Empowering the Young Generation with Digital Fabrication and Making , 2016, ICIS.

[8]  Jane Abbiss,et al.  Gendering the ICT curriculum: The paradox of choice , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Kshiti D. Joshi,et al.  Is the information systems profession gendered?: characterization of IS professionals and IS careers , 2003, SIGMIS CPR '03.

[10]  Gary Schmidt,et al.  Reasons women pursue a computer science career: perspectives of women from a mid-sized institution , 2004 .

[11]  Vicki Leigh Noles Rogers,et al.  Women in IT: The Endangered Gender , 2015, SIGUCCS.

[12]  Sigrid Norris,et al.  Interactions, images and texts : a reader in multimodality , 2014 .

[13]  Leena Kuure,et al.  Video diary as a means for data gathering with children - Encountering identities in the making , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  M. Blomqvist Absent women : Research on gender relations in IT education mediated by Swedish newspapers , 2010 .

[15]  Ron Babin,et al.  Identifying Influencers in High School Student ICT Career Choice. , 2010 .

[16]  Hai Hong,et al.  Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Pursuit of Computer Science and Related Fields , 2015, ITiCSE.

[17]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[18]  Peter E. J. Kemp,et al.  Technical boys and creative girls: the career aspirations of digitally skilled youths , 2017 .

[19]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Cultural (Re)production of digital inequality in a US community technology initiative , 2006 .

[20]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Women talking about IT work: duality or dualism? , 2003, SIGMIS CPR '03.

[21]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Why IS: Understanding Undergraduate Students' Intentions to Choose an Information Systems Major , 2007, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[22]  Elena Gorbacheva,et al.  Directions for research on gender imbalance in the IT profession , 2018, EJIS.

[23]  Jane Stout,et al.  Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics , 2014 .

[24]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Social Inclusion and the Information Systems Field: Why Now? , 2006, Social Inclusion.

[25]  Leonie Rowan,et al.  The continued underrepresentation of girls in post-compulsory information technology courses: a direct challenge to teacher education , 2011 .

[26]  Terri L. Lenox,et al.  Factors Affecting Women's Decisions to Pursue an IS Degree: A Case Study. , 2010 .

[27]  Jo Coldwell-Neilson,et al.  Are IT interventions for girls a special case? , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[28]  Sapna Cheryan,et al.  When Do Female Role Models Benefit Women? The Importance of Differentiating Recruitment From Retention in STEM , 2011 .

[29]  Norman K. Denzin,et al.  The Interaction Order , 2019 .

[30]  A. McIlroy,et al.  Does Gender Still Matter? A Study of the Views of Women in the ICT Industry in New Zealand , 2007 .

[31]  O. Malanchuk,et al.  Who's computing? Gender and race differences in young adults' decisions to pursue an information technology career. , 2005, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[32]  Janet Shibley Hyde,et al.  Gender similarities and differences. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  Zhen Shao,et al.  Examining the impact mechanism of social psychological motivations on individuals' continuance intention of MOOCs: The moderating effect of gender , 2017, Internet Res..

[34]  Laurie Patterson,et al.  Closing The Gender Gap in the Technology Major , 2016 .

[35]  Lori Carter Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science , 2006, SIGCSE '06.

[36]  Caroline Oehlhorn Drawing on the Underrepresentation of Women in IT-Professions: An Analysis of Existing Knowledge and Need for Research along the Stages of Educational Systems , 2017, SIGMIS-CPR.

[37]  Ioanna Vekiri,et al.  Boys' and girls' ICT beliefs: Do teachers matter? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Theda Thomas,et al.  Gender Differences in Students' Perceptions of Information Technology as a Career , 2006, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[39]  E. Goffman On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. , 1955, Psychiatry.

[40]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The role of theory in gender and information systems research , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[41]  Jennifer Wells,et al.  Mediated Discourse Analysis , 2012 .

[42]  I. Boivie Women, Men and Programming : Knowledge, Metaphors and Masculinity , 2010 .

[43]  Shahnaz Kamberi Exposing girls to computer science: Does the all-girl model really work? , 2017, 2017 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC).

[44]  Kim Holmberg,et al.  Gender differences in the climate change communication on Twitter , 2015, Internet Res..

[45]  Nathan Ensmenger,et al.  Making Programming Masculine , 2010 .

[46]  J. Clifford,et al.  Writing culture : the poetics and politics of ethnography : a School of American Research advanced seminar , 1986 .

[47]  Sylvia Beyer,et al.  Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades , 2014, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[48]  Marianne Kinnula,et al.  Girls' Choice - Why Won't they pick IT? , 2019, ECIS.

[49]  Heteronormativity revisited: Adolescents' educational choices, sexuality and soaps , 2010 .

[50]  J. Aultman The Hidden Curriculum , 2007 .

[51]  Hannah M. Dee,et al.  Inspiring women undergraduates , 2010, ITiCSE '10.

[52]  Susan Halford,et al.  RECONCEPTUALIZING DIGITAL SOCIAL INEQUALITY , 2010 .

[53]  Marja Vehviläinen,et al.  Gender and computing in retrospect: the case of Finland , 1999, IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput..

[54]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Are there enough seats for women at the IT table? , 2012, INROADS.

[55]  Vincent N. Parrillo Encyclopedia of Social Problems , 2008 .

[56]  Richard Anker Helina Melkas Occupational segregation by sex in Nordic countries: An empirical investigation , 1997 .

[57]  E. Goffman The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address , 1983 .

[58]  Ruth A. Guthrie,et al.  How did mathemathematics and accounting get so many women majors?: what can IT disciplines learn? , 2011, SIGITE '11.

[59]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Information and Communication Technology and the Social Inclusion of Refugees , 2016, MIS Q..

[60]  Leena Kuure,et al.  "Arseing around was Fun!" – Humor as a Resource in Design and Making , 2020, CHI.

[61]  Carina de Villiers,et al.  An analysis of the international discourse about women in information technology , 2009, SAICSIT '09.

[62]  Manju K. Ahuja Women in the information technology profession: a literature review, synthesis and research agenda , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[63]  David T. Croasdell,et al.  Why don't more women major in information systems? , 2011, Inf. Technol. People.

[64]  R. Labonté Social inclusion/exclusion: dancing the dialectic. , 2004, Health promotion international.

[65]  Catherine Lang,et al.  Sequential attrition of secondary school student interest in IT courses and careers , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[66]  Dale Riepe,et al.  Intelligibility and the Philosophy of Nothingness. , 1959 .

[67]  Lola B. Smith The Socialization of Females with Regard to a Technology-Related Career: Recommendations for Change. , 2000 .

[68]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Gender Issues in Learning and Working with Information Technology: Social Constructs and Cultural Contexts , 2010 .

[69]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[70]  Ron Scollon,et al.  Mediated Discourse: The nexus of practice , 2001 .

[71]  Vicki L. Plano Clark,et al.  Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach , 2008 .

[72]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Why are Women Underrepresented in IT? The Role of Implicit and Explicit Gender Identity , 2016, AMCIS.

[73]  Marianne Kinnula,et al.  Interaction Order and Historical Body Shaping Children's Making Projects - A Literature Review , 2019, Multimodal Technol. Interact..

[74]  Susan M. Haller,et al.  Deterrents to women taking computer science courses , 2004, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[75]  R. Sultana,et al.  Career Guidance Policies in 37 Countries: Contrasts and Common Themes , 2004 .

[76]  K. Stagnitti,et al.  The reading discovery program: Increasing social inclusion of marginalised families , 2009 .

[77]  Lisa Anderson,et al.  How Can Universities Best Encourage Women to Major in Information Systems? , 2017, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[78]  Els Kuiper,et al.  New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[79]  Varun Grover,et al.  Me, My Self, and I(T): Conceptualizing Information Technology Identity and its Implications , 2015, MIS Q..

[80]  S. Michie,et al.  Barriers women face in information technology careers , 2006 .

[81]  Leena Kuure,et al.  Exclusions in social inclusion projects: Struggles in involving children in digital technology development , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[82]  Richard Edwards,et al.  Include me out: critical readings of social exclusion, social inclusion and lifelong learning , 2001 .

[83]  Deborah Butler,et al.  Gender, Girls, and Computer Technology: What's the Status Now? , 2000 .

[84]  Clifton Kussmaul Software product proposals in a computer science course for non-majors , 2004 .

[85]  Allen B. Downey,et al.  Integrating empirical methods into computer science , 2002, SIGCSE '02.

[86]  Terri L. Lenox,et al.  Factors Influencing Students' Decisions to Major In A Computer-Related Discipline , 2012 .

[87]  John Maltby,et al.  Impact of the Internet on our lives: Male and female personal perspectives , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[88]  Julie Fisher,et al.  If Girls Aren't Interested in Computers Can We Change Their Minds? , 2015, ECIS.

[89]  J. Blommaert,et al.  Historical bodies and historical space , 2011 .

[90]  Kate M. Kaiser,et al.  Early determinants of women in the IT workforce: a model of girls' career choices , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[91]  Leena Kuure,et al.  Multiple voices in the Maker movement - a Nexus analytic literature Review on children, Education and Making , 2017, ECIS.

[92]  Corey Schimpf,et al.  The Underrepresentation of Women in Computing Fields: A Synthesis of Literature Using a Life Course Perspective , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[93]  L. Carter Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science , 2006, SIGCSE.

[94]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  'Because it's boring, irrelevant and I don't like computers': Why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[95]  John Woollard,et al.  Female students' experiences of programming: it's not all bad! , 2011, ITiCSE '11.

[96]  Thompson S. H. Teo Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities , 2001, Internet Res..

[97]  Leena Kuure,et al.  Multiple voices in ICT design with children – a nexus analytical enquiry , 2015, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[98]  J Mcgrath Cohoon,et al.  Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors , 2002, SGCS.

[99]  Marianne Kinnula,et al.  Gendering and Segregation in Girls' Perceptions of IT as a Career Choice - A Nexus Analytic Inquiry , 2019, ISD.

[100]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Computing Whether She Belongs: Stereotypes Undermine Girls’ Interest and Sense of Belonging in Computer Science , 2016 .

[101]  Lee A. Freeman,et al.  Are Men More Technology-Oriented Than Women? The Role of Gender on the Development of General Computer Self-Efficacy of College Students , 2010, AMCIS.

[102]  Ilse Mariën,et al.  Digital inclusion and user (dis)empowerment: a critical perspective , 2014 .