Space, time, and causality in the human brain

The ability to perceive causality is a central human ability constructed from elemental spatial and temporal information present in the environment. Although the nature of causality has captivated philosophers and scientists since antiquity, the neural correlates of causality remain poorly understood. In the present study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to generate hypotheses for candidate brain regions related to component processes important for perceptual causality in the human brain: elemental space perception, elemental time perception, and decision-making (Experiment 1; n=16). We then used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to test neural hypotheses generated from the fMRI experiment (Experiment 2; n=16). In both experiments, participants judged causality in billiard-ball style launching events; a blue ball approaches and contacts a red ball. Spatial and temporal contributions to causal perception were assessed by parametrically varying the spatial linearity and the temporal delays of the movement of the balls. Experiment 1 demonstrated unique patterns of activation correlated with spatial, temporal, and decision-making components of causality perception. Using tDCS, we then tested hypotheses for the specific roles of the parietal and frontal cortices found in the fMRI experiment. Parietal stimulation only decreased participants' perception of causality based on spatial violations, while frontal stimulation made participants less likely to perceive causality based on violations of space and time. Converging results from fMRI and tDCS indicate that parietal cortices contribute to causal perception because of their specific role in processing spatial relations, while the frontal cortices contribute more generally, consistent with their role in decision-making.

[1]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Carving the clock at its component joints: neural bases for interval timing. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Wolfgang Tschacher,et al.  Perception of causality in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. , 2006, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  P. Strick,et al.  Activation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) during performance of visually guided movements. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  A. Leslie The Perception of Causality in Infants , 1982, Perception.

[6]  V. Walsh,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Facilitates Decision Making in a Probabilistic Guessing Task , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  M. S. Salman Topical Review : The Cerebellum: It's About Time! But Timing Is Not Everything-New Insights Into the Role of the Cerebellum in Timing Motor and Cognitive Tasks , 2002, Journal of child neurology.

[8]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.

[9]  P. F. Powesland,et al.  The effect of practice upon the perception of causality. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[10]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  N. Troje,et al.  Audiovisual phenomenal causality , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Kwang-Hyuk Lee,et al.  The Role of the Cerebellum in Subsecond Time Perception: Evidence from Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  H. Gruber,et al.  Effects of experience on perception of causality. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  A Schlottmann,et al.  Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: how children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[18]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  A Madness to the Methods in Cognitive Neuroscience? , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  L. Cohen,et al.  Infant perception of a causal event , 1990 .

[20]  D. Shanks Forward and Backward Blocking in Human Contingency Judgement , 1985 .

[21]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociating Inhibition, Attention, and Response Control in the Frontoparietal Network Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[23]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Decoding the role of the insula in human cognition: functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Martin Wiener,et al.  Temporal Discrimination of Sub- and Suprasecond Time Intervals: A Voxel-Based Lesion Mapping Analysis , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[26]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  Benjamin Straube,et al.  The role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causality: a tDCS study , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Lewis Wolpert Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast , 2006 .

[29]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  How the brain perceives causality: an event-related fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[30]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Neural Correlates of Perceptual Choice and Decision Making during Fear–Disgust Discrimination , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2014, NeuroImage.

[32]  Arne Nagels,et al.  Differences and commonalities in the judgment of causality in physical and social contexts: An fMRI study , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  A. Michotte The perception of causality , 1963 .

[34]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Microstructural Organization of the Cingulum Tract and the Level of Default Mode Functional Connectivity , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Paul Van Hecke,et al.  Internal vs external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback , 2003, NeuroImage.

[37]  M. Buehner,et al.  Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal induction , 2002 .

[38]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[39]  Sara J Shettleworth Cognition: theories of mind in animals and humans , 2009, Nature.

[40]  A. Woods,et al.  Context Modulates the Contribution of Time and Space in Causal Inference , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[41]  D. Dèttore,et al.  Obsessive-compulsive disorder and thinking illusions , 2011 .

[42]  Jon May,et al.  Rethinking Temporal Contiguity and the Judgement of Causality: Effects of Prior Knowledge, Experience, and Reinforcement Procedure , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[43]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri – precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation : Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2010 .

[44]  P. Wolff Representing causation. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  M. Husain,et al.  The functional role of the inferior parietal lobe in the dorsal and ventral stream dichotomy , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Selection and inhibition mechanisms for human voluntary action decisions , 2012, NeuroImage.

[47]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[48]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Activation of Prefrontal Cortex by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Appetite for Risk during Ambiguous Decision Making , 2007 .

[49]  Valerie Kirsch,et al.  Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[50]  M. Buehner,et al.  Causal Contraction , 2010, Psychological science.

[51]  Byung-Mo Oh,et al.  Functional improvement and neuroplastic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered 1day vs. 1week after cerebral ischemia in rats , 2012, Brain Research.

[52]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited , 2007, NeuroImage.

[53]  P. Wolff Dynamics and the perception of causal events , 2006 .

[54]  B. Yin,et al.  Exploring the 4th Dimension: Hippocampus, Time, and Memory Revisited , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[55]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills , 2010, Brain Research.

[56]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[57]  Tilo Kircher,et al.  Neural correlates of causality judgment in physical and social context—The reversed effects of space and time , 2012, NeuroImage.

[58]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Different Brain Circuits Underlie Motor and Perceptual Representations of Temporal Intervals , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  Cameron S Carter,et al.  Stimulus and response conflict processing during perceptual decision making , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[60]  P. Fonlupt Perception and judgement of physical causality involve different brain structures. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[61]  Jia-Hong Gao,et al.  Is left inferior frontal gyrus a general mechanism for selection? , 2004, NeuroImage.

[62]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[63]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Left inferior parietal cortex integrates time and space during collision judgments , 2003, NeuroImage.

[64]  A. Leslie Spatiotemporal Continuity and the Perception of Causality in Infants , 1984, Perception.

[65]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Selecting among competing alternatives: selection and retrieval in the left inferior frontal gyrus. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  L. Wolpert Causal belief and the origins of technology , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[67]  A. Leslie,et al.  Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.

[68]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[69]  Anne Schlottmann,et al.  The perception of social and mechanical causality in young children with ASD , 2007 .

[70]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Space and Time in Perceptual Causality , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[71]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Commentary and Opinion: II. Statistical Parametric Mapping: Ontology and Current Issues , 1995, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[72]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets , 2006, Neuron.