A negotiation framework for linked combinatorial optimization problems

We tackle the challenge of applying automated negotiation to self-interested agents with local but linked combinatorial optimization problems. Using a distributed production scheduling problem, we propose two negotiation strategies for making concessions in a joint search space of agreements. In the first strategy, building on Lai and Sycara (Group Decis Negot 18(2):169–187, 2009), an agent concedes on local utility in order to achieve an agreement. In the second strategy, an agent concedes on the distance in an attribute space while maximizing its local utility. Lastly, we introduce a Pareto improvement phase to bring the final agreement closer to the Pareto frontier. Experimental results show that the new attribute-space negotiation strategy outperforms its utility-based counterpart on the quality of the agreements and the Pareto improvement phase is effective in approaching the Pareto frontier. This article presents the first study of applying automated negotiation to self-interested agents each with a local, but linked, combinatorial optimization problem.

[1]  Herbert Meyr,et al.  Planning Hierarchy, Modeling and Advanced Planning Systems , 2003, Supply Chain Management.

[2]  Guoming Lai,et al.  A Generic Framework for Automated Multi-attribute Negotiation , 2009 .

[3]  Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès,et al.  Single item lot sizing problems , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Ilya Segal,et al.  Solutions manual for Microeconomic theory : Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green , 1997 .

[5]  S. Graves,et al.  Supply chain management : design, coordination and operation , 2003 .

[6]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  A Robust Optimization Approach to Inventory Theory , 2006, Oper. Res..

[7]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments , 2001, Intelligent robots and autonomous agents.

[9]  Amnon Meisels,et al.  Local search for distributed asymmetric optimization , 2010, AAMAS.

[10]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Introduction to multiagent systems , 2001 .

[12]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  Negotiation in Semi-cooperative Agreement Problems , 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[13]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[14]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[15]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Adopt: asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with quality guarantees , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Bo An,et al.  Decommitment in multi-resource negotiation , 2008, AAMAS.

[17]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Multi-linked negotiation in multi-agent systems , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[18]  David F. Pyke,et al.  Inventory management and production planning and scheduling , 1998 .

[19]  M. Dogru,et al.  Multi-agent Negotiation for Distributed Production Scheduling Problems , 2010 .

[20]  Terry L. Zimmerman,et al.  Distributed management of flexible times schedules , 2007, AAMAS '07.