Determining sample size to evaluate and compare the accuracy of binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial disease verification

Calculating sample size to evaluate the accuracy of a binary diagnostic test and to compare the accuracy of two binary diagnostic tests is an important question in the study of diagnostic statistical methods. In the presence of partial disease verification, the disease status of some patients in the sample is unknown, so that the calculation of sample size can be complicated. A method to calculate sample size when evaluating the sensitivity and the specificity of a binary diagnostic test and when comparing the sensitivity and specificity of two binary tests in the presence of partial disease verification is proposed. The results obtained were applied to the diagnosis of coronary stenosis.

[1]  Chaya S Moskowitz,et al.  Sample size calculations for comparative studies of medical tests for detecting presence of disease , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Using EM to Obtain Asymptotic Variance-Covariance Matrices: The SEM Algorithm , 1991 .

[3]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine , 2002 .

[4]  Ofer Harel,et al.  Multiple imputation for the comparison of two screening tests in two‐phase Alzheimer studies , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  L. Brown,et al.  Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion , 2001 .

[6]  José Antonio Roldán Nofuentes,et al.  Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[7]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias , 1993 .

[8]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[9]  Jialiang Li,et al.  On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  The effect of verification bias on the comparison of predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests , 2008 .

[11]  J. A. R. Nofuentes,et al.  Risk of Error and the Kappa Coefficient of a Binary Diagnostic Test in the Presence of Partial Verification , 2007 .

[12]  José Antonio Roldán Nofuentes,et al.  The Effect of Verification Bias in the Naïve Estimators of Accuracy of a Binary Diagnostic Test , 2007, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[13]  G. Fosgate.  Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy , 1998, Statistical methods in medical research.

[15]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Comparing accuracies of two screening tests in a two‐phase study for dementia , 2002 .

[16]  J. A. R. Nofuentes,et al.  EM algorithm for comparing two binary diagnostic tests when not all the patients are verified , 2008 .

[17]  X H Zhou,et al.  Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy , 1998, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  J. A. Roldán Nofuentes,et al.  Computational methods for comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification of the disease , 2009, Comput. Stat..

[19]  L. Appel,et al.  How many patients are necessary to assess test performance? , 1990, JAMA.

[20]  Nandini Dendukuri,et al.  Bayesian Sample Size Determination for Prevalence and Diagnostic Test Studies in the Absence of a Gold Standard Test , 2004, Biometrics.

[21]  Huiman X Barnhart,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  Huiman X Barnhart,et al.  Accounting for Nonignorable Verification Bias in Assessment of Diagnostic Tests , 2003, Biometrics.

[23]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[24]  X H Zhou,et al.  Effect of verification bias on positive and negative predictive values. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  Les Irwig,et al.  Analytic methods for comparing two dichotomous screening or diagnostic tests applied to two populations of differing disease prevalence when individuals negative on both tests are unverified , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  James D. Stamey,et al.  Bayesian variable selection for Poisson regression with underreported responses , 2010, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[27]  R A Greenes,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. , 1983, Biometrics.

[28]  A. Agresti,et al.  Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions , 1998 .

[29]  D. Rubin.  INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA , 1975 .

[30]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[31]  S D Walter,et al.  Effects of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic test performance. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  Ofer Harel,et al.  Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[33]  P M Vacek,et al.  The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests. , 1985, Biometrics.

[34]  A. Hadgu,et al.  Evaluation of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in the Absence of a Perfect Gold-Standard Test: A Review of the Statistical and Epidemiologic Issues , 2005, Epidemiology.

[35]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Novel designs for multi‐arm clinical trials with survival outcomes with an application in ovarian cancer , 2003, Statistics in medicine.