Continuous flash suppression operates in local spatial zones: Effects of mask size and contrast

HIGHLIGHTSContinuous flash suppression (CFS) is more effective with higher mask contrasts.Mask size has no consistent effect on suppression durations.Presenting a collinear surround weakens the effectiveness of a central mask.Suppression is stronger in orthogonal and no‐surround conditions.Low mask collinearity may explain the lack of clear mask size effects in CFS. ABSTRACT Continuous flash suppression (CFS) is a technique in which presenting one eye with a dynamic Mondrian sequence prevents a low‐contrast target in the other eye from being perceived for many seconds. Frequently used to study unconscious visual processing, CFS bears many similarities with binocular rivalry (BR), another popular dichoptic stimulation technique. It is therefore puzzling that the effect of mask size and contrast seem to differ between CFS and BR. To resolve this discrepancy, we conducted a systematic investigation on the effects of mask size and contrast in CFS. Also, building on findings from BR, we asked if the collinearity of the contours in the Mondrian masker play a role in CFS suppression. Our results showed a robust effect of mask contrast on suppression durations, and an effect of mask size that depended on collinearity. Specifically, higher mask contrasts produced longer suppression regardless of collinearity and mask size. Mask size, on the other hand, had little effect on suppression when collinearity was low and it weakened suppression when collinearity is high. These observations parallel prior findings in BR, further substantiating the close link between the two paradigms and demonstrating the usefulness of a shared explanatory framework describing both phenomena.

[1]  D M Levi,et al.  Surround modulation of perceived contrast and the role of brightness induction. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[2]  D. Melcher,et al.  Time for Awareness: The Influence of Temporal Properties of the Mask on Continuous Flash Suppression Effectiveness , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  Sheng He,et al.  Processing of Invisible Stimuli: Advantage of Upright Faces and Recognizable Words in Overcoming Interocular Suppression , 2007, Psychological science.

[4]  Naotsugu Tsuchiya,et al.  Intact rapid detection of fearful faces in the absence of the amygdala , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Emotion colors time perception unconsciously , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  Patrick T. Goodbourn,et al.  A population study of binocular function , 2015, Vision Research.

[7]  Randolph Blake,et al.  A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry , 2004, Vision Research.

[8]  R. Blake,et al.  Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. , 2007, Emotion.

[9]  Egor Ananyev,et al.  Separate requirements for detection and perceptual stability of motion in interocular suppression , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  C. Paffen,et al.  Visual input signaling threat gains preferential access to awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm , 2016, Cognition.

[11]  Denise Chen,et al.  Olfaction Modulates Visual Perception in Binocular Rivalry , 2010, Current Biology.

[12]  W. Levelt,et al.  The ‘laws’ of binocular rivalry: 50 years of Levelt’s propositions , 2015, Vision Research.

[13]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Unseen Affective Faces Influence Person Perception Judgments in Schizophrenia , 2014, Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[14]  K. Cave,et al.  Abstract stimuli associated with threat through conditioning cannot be detected preattentively. , 2005, Emotion.

[15]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash , 1984, Vision Research.

[16]  Marius V. Peelen,et al.  Eye contact facilitates awareness of faces during interocular suppression , 2011, Cognition.

[17]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Suppressed images selectively affect the dominant percept during binocular rivalry. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[18]  M. Morrone,et al.  BOLD response to spatial phase congruency in human brain. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  R. Blake,et al.  On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[20]  Sterzer Philipp,et al.  Altered contextual modulation of primary visual cortex responses in schizophrenia , 2012 .

[21]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Moving Stimuli Are Less Effectively Masked Using Traditional Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) Compared to a Moving Mondrian Mask (MMM): A Test Case for Feature-Selective Suppression and Retinotopic Adaptation , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Serial correlations in Continuous Flash Suppression , 2015, Neuroscience of consciousness.

[23]  Min-Suk Kang.  Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[24]  R. Blake.  A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry , 1989 .

[25]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Scene Integration Without Awareness , 2016, Psychological science.

[26]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Center–surround interactions in visual motion processing during binocular rivalry , 2004, Vision Research.

[28]  Sid Kouider,et al.  Nonconscious Influences from Emotional Faces: A Comparison of Visual Crowding, Masking, and Continuous Flash Suppression , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[29]  R. Blake,et al.  What is Suppressed during Binocular Rivalry? , 1980, Perception.

[30]  C. Koch,et al.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Blake,et al.  A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  Duje Tadin,et al.  Perceptual training profoundly alters binocular rivalry through both sensory and attentional enhancements , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Chris L. E. Paffen,et al.  Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[34]  Sheng He,et al.  Semantic and subword priming during binocular suppression , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[35]  K. Albus,et al.  Effects of interacting visual patterns on single cell responses in cat's striate cortex , 1977, Vision Research.

[36]  R. Blake,et al.  Slow and steady, not fast and furious: Slow temporal modulation strengthens continuous flash suppression , 2018, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  Philipp Sterzer,et al.  Not just another face in the crowd: detecting emotional schematic faces during continuous flash suppression. , 2012, Emotion.

[38]  David Alais,et al.  Independent Binocular Rivalry Processes for Motion and Form , 2006, Neuron.

[39]  Surya Gayet,et al.  Between-Subject Variability in the Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression Paradigm: Potential Causes, Consequences, and Solutions , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[40]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Integration without awareness: expanding the limits of unconscious processing , 2011 .

[42]  D. Alais,et al.  The temporal frequency tuning of continuous flash suppression reveals peak suppression at very low frequencies , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[43]  P. Sterzer,et al.  High-level face shape adaptation depends on visual awareness: evidence from continuous flash suppression. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[44]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[45]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[46]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  R. Blake.  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[48]  Pieter Moors,et al.  Frequent Words Do Not Break Continuous Flash Suppression Differently from Infrequent or Nonexistent Words: Implications for Semantic Processing of Words in the Absence of Awareness , 2014, PloS one.

[49]  Yaroslav O. Halchenko,et al.  Prioritized Detection of Personally Familiar Faces , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  S. Los,et al.  On the origin of mixing costs: exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials , 1996 .

[51]  S Zeki,et al.  The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Erich W Graf,et al.  Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  D. Alais,et al.  Contour interactions between pairs of Gabors engaged in binocular rivalry reveal a map of the association field , 2006, Vision Research.

[54]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[55]  R. van Ee,et al.  Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[56]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Mechanisms of face perception. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[57]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Electromagnetic responses to invisible face stimuli during binocular suppression , 2009, NeuroImage.

[58]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Sensitivity Underlying Changes in Visual Consciousness , 2010, Current Biology.

[59]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Integration Without Awareness , 2011, Psychological science.

[60]  S. Shergill,et al.  Visual Surround Suppression in Schizophrenia , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[61]  Kevin C. Dieter,et al.  When can attention influence binocular rivalry? , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[62]  David Alais,et al.  Strength of continuous flash suppression is optimal when target and masker modulation rates are matched. , 2018, Journal of vision.

[63]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Stimulus Fractionation by Interocular Suppression , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[64]  Norbert Kathmann,et al.  Differential modulation of visual object processing in dorsal and ventral stream by stimulus visibility , 2016, Cortex.

[65]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[67]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Intact unconscious processing of eye contact in schizophrenia , 2015, Schizophrenia Research: Cognition.

[68]  Marius V. Peelen,et al.  Privileged detection of conspecifics: Evidence from inversion effects during continuous flash suppression , 2012, Cognition.

[69]  Chunbo Li,et al.  Can interpersonal hypersensitivity under subconscious condition explain paranoid symptom in schizophrenia? , 2017, Asia-Pacific psychiatry : official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists.

[70]  D. Heeger,et al.  Continuous Flash Suppression Modulates Cortical Activity in Early Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[72]  Milena Rabovsky,et al.  Access to Awareness for Faces during Continuous Flash Suppression Is Not Modulated by Affective Knowledge , 2016, PloS one.

[73]  P. Sterzer,et al.  Exploring the boundary conditions of unconscious numerical priming effects with continuous flash suppression , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[74]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Center–surround inhibition deepens binocular rivalry suppression , 2005, Vision Research.

[75]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  Katie L. H. Gray,et al.  High-Level Face Adaptation Without Awareness , 2010, Psychological science.

[77]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry , 2017, Vision Research.

[78]  D. Alais,et al.  Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specific components of rivalry suppression. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[79]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[80]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Spontaneous eyeblinks during breaking continuous flash suppression are associated with increased detection times. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[81]  Stefan Van der Stigchel,et al.  Assessing the generalizability of eye dominance across binocular rivalry, onset rivalry, and continuous flash suppression. , 2018, Journal of vision.

[82]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Battle of the Mondrians: Investigating the Role of Unpredictability in Continuous Flash Suppression , 2018, i-Perception.

[83]  Cameron S Carter,et al.  Diminished orientation-specific surround suppression of visual processing in schizophrenia. , 2009, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[84]  P. Sterzer,et al.  Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression? , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[85]  O. Blanke,et al.  Posing for awareness: proprioception modulates access to visual consciousness in a continuous flash suppression task. , 2013, Journal of vision.