Bifidobacterium pseudolongum in the Ceca of Rats Fed Hi-Maize Starch Has Characteristics of a Keystone Species in Bifidobacterial Blooms

This study addresses the microbiology and function of a natural ecosystem (the rat gut) using DNA-based observations and in vitro experimentation. The microbial community of the large bowel of animals, including humans, has been studied extensively through the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing methods and advanced bioinformatics analysis. These studies reveal the compositions and genetic capacities of microbiotas but not the intricacies of how microbial communities function. Our work, combining DNA sequence analysis and laboratory experiments with cultured strains of bacteria, revealed that the increased abundance of bifidobacteria in the rat gut, induced by feeding indigestible starch, involved a species that cannot itself degrade the starch (Bifidobacterium animalis) but cohabits with a species that can (Bifidobacterium pseudolongum). B. pseudolongum has the characteristics of a keystone species in the community because it had low abundance but high ability to perform a critical function, the hydrolysis of resistant starch. ABSTRACT Starches resistant to mammalian digestion are present in foods and pass to the large bowel, where they may be degraded and fermented by the microbiota. Increases in relative abundances of bifidobacteria (blooms) have been reported in rats whose diet was supplemented with Hi-Maize resistant starch. We determined that the bifidobacterial species present in the rat cecum under these circumstances mostly belonged to Bifidobacterium animalis. However, cultures of B. animalis isolated from the rats failed to degrade Hi-Maize starch to any extent. In contrast, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum also detected in the rat microbiota had high starch-degrading ability. Transcriptional comparisons showed increased expression of a type 1 pullulanase, alpha-amylase, and glycogen debranching enzyme by B. pseudolongum when cultured in medium containing Hi-Maize starch. Maltose was released into the culture medium, and B. animalis cultures had shorter doubling times in maltose medium than did B. pseudolongum. Thus, B. pseudolongum, which was present at a consistently low abundance in the microbiota, but which has extensive enzymatic capacity to degrade resistant starch, showed the attributes of a keystone species associated with the bifidobacterial bloom. IMPORTANCE This study addresses the microbiology and function of a natural ecosystem (the rat gut) using DNA-based observations and in vitro experimentation. The microbial community of the large bowel of animals, including humans, has been studied extensively through the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing methods and advanced bioinformatics analysis. These studies reveal the compositions and genetic capacities of microbiotas but not the intricacies of how microbial communities function. Our work, combining DNA sequence analysis and laboratory experiments with cultured strains of bacteria, revealed that the increased abundance of bifidobacteria in the rat gut, induced by feeding indigestible starch, involved a species that cannot itself degrade the starch (Bifidobacterium animalis) but cohabits with a species that can (Bifidobacterium pseudolongum). B. pseudolongum has the characteristics of a keystone species in the community because it had low abundance but high ability to perform a critical function, the hydrolysis of resistant starch.

[1]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The ecological theater and the evolutionary play , 1965 .

[2]  N. Mcneil The contribution of the large intestine to energy supplies in man. , 1984, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  B. Biavati,et al.  The genus Bifidobacterium , 1995 .

[4]  J. Castilla,et al.  Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .

[5]  W. Holzapfel,et al.  The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria , 1999 .

[6]  S. Tabata,et al.  Identification of the Catalytic Residues of Bifunctional Glycogen Debranching Enzyme* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Quantitative PCR with 16S rRNA-Gene-Targeted Species-Specific Primers for Analysis of Human Intestinal Bifidobacteria , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[8]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  D. van Sinderen,et al.  Screening for and Identification of Starch-, Amylopectin-, and Pullulan-Degrading Activities in Bifidobacterial Strains , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  B. White,et al.  Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[11]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[12]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[13]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[14]  M. Kitaoka,et al.  Physiology of Consumption of Human Milk Oligosaccharides by Infant Gut-associated Bifidobacteria* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  W. Young,et al.  Changes in Bowel Microbiota Induced by Feeding Weanlings Resistant Starch Stimulate Transcriptomic and Physiological Responses , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  G. Holtrop,et al.  Resource partitioning in relation to cohabitation of Lactobacillus species in the mouse forestomach , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[17]  H. Flint,et al.  Ruminococcus bromii is a keystone species for the degradation of resistant starch in the human colon , 2012, The ISME Journal.

[18]  Davis J. McCarthy,et al.  Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  R. Barrangou,et al.  Transcriptional analysis of oligosaccharide utilization by Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[20]  B. Faircloth,et al.  Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  G. Tannock,et al.  Whole-Transcriptome Shotgun Sequencing (RNA-seq) Screen Reveals Upregulation of Cellobiose and Motility Operons of Lactobacillus ruminis L5 during Growth on Tetrasaccharides Derived from Barley β-Glucan , 2013, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  B. Tjaden,et al.  Computational analysis of bacterial RNA-Seq data , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  R. Gibson,et al.  Comparison of the Compositions of the Stool Microbiotas of Infants Fed Goat Milk Formula, Cow Milk-Based Formula, or Breast Milk , 2013, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  H. Flint,et al.  Some are more equal than others , 2013, Gut microbes.

[25]  J. Clemente,et al.  The Long-Term Stability of the Human Gut Microbiota , 2013 .

[26]  W. Young,et al.  Bowel microbiota moderate host physiological responses to dietary konjac in weanling rats. , 2013, The Journal of nutrition.

[27]  H. Flint,et al.  ‘ Diet, gut microbiology and human health , 2015 .

[28]  N. Roy,et al.  RNA–Stable-Isotope Probing Shows Utilization of Carbon from Inulin by Specific Bacterial Populations in the Rat Large Bowel , 2014, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  S. Croubels,et al.  Metabolic fingerprinting reveals a novel candidate biomarker for prednisolone treatment in cattle , 2015, Metabolomics.

[30]  Y. Pawitan,et al.  Large-scale non-targeted metabolomic profiling in three human population-based studies , 2014, bioRxiv.

[31]  B. Henrissat,et al.  Glycan complexity dictates microbial resource allocation in the large intestine , 2015, Nature Communications.

[32]  Danielle G. Lemay,et al.  Erratum: Comparative transcriptomics reveals key differences in the response to milk oligosaccharides of infant gut-associated bifidobacteria , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Danielle G. Lemay,et al.  Comparative transcriptomics reveals key differences in the response to milk oligosaccharides of infant gut-associated bifidobacteria , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[34]  J. J. Morris Black Queen evolution: the role of leakiness in structuring microbial communities. , 2015, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[35]  N. Segata,et al.  Bifidobacteria exhibit social behavior through carbohydrate resource sharing in the gut , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[36]  H. Brüssow Biome engineering‐2020 , 2016, Microbial biotechnology.

[37]  K. Fraser,et al.  Digestive-resistant carbohydrates affect lipid metabolism in rats , 2016, Metabolomics.

[38]  W. Kelly,et al.  Differential growth of bowel commensal Bacteroides species on plant xylans of differing structural complexity. , 2017, Carbohydrate polymers.

[39]  A. Kushiro,et al.  Microscale spatial analysis provides evidence for adhesive monopolization of dietary nutrients by specific intestinal bacteria , 2017, PloS one.

[40]  G. Tannock Understanding the Gut Microbiota , 2017 .

[41]  I-Min A. Chen,et al.  IMG/M: integrated genome and metagenome comparative data analysis system , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  D. Berry,et al.  Microbial nutrient niches in the gut , 2017, Environmental microbiology.