The investigation of the maneuverability deterioration based on acceleration radius theory

Abstract Maneuverability is the measure of the dynamic performance of a manipulator in a specific posture or configuration, and acceleration radius is one of the most utilized indices of it. Acceleration radius can be utilized as the reference to judge whether further dynamic analysis should be performed when evaluating the controllability and feasibility of the manipulator following the prescribed path with assigned kinematic and kinetic requirements in the planning phase. When utilizing acceleration radius as the dynamic reference in the planning phase, it can prevent wasting the calculation cost due to these non-necessary dynamic analyses, and it can also be utilized as the benchmark in the on-line control. However, the existence of the configuration errors is inevitable in reality, and it deteriorates the dynamic performance of a manipulator with the ideal configuration parameters and leads to the potential risk of failing to achieve an assigned dynamic task. To investigate the adverse behavior caused by the configuration errors and to provide some clues to avoid or reduce their influence, this article proposes a novel and systematic method which can be used to evaluate the maneuverability deterioration of a non-redundant serial manipulator system due to the influence of configuration errors, and it also provides an index, deterioration rate, to quantitate this kind of deterioration. Deterioration rate can be utilized to quantitate the maneuverability deterioration due to the influence of configuration errors in a prescribed workspace or region and can also be treated as the safety or derating margin when proceeding with the control or path planning.

[1]  Pasquale Chiacchio,et al.  A new dynamic manipulability ellipsoid for redundant manipulators , 2000, Robotica.

[2]  Myung Jin Chung,et al.  Evaluation of dexterity measures for a 3-link planar redundant manipulator using constraint locus , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  Valenciennes Cedex,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF GEOMETRIC AND NON GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS OF ROBOTS , 1990 .

[4]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  A Global Performance Index for the Kinematic Optimization of Robotic Manipulators , 1991 .

[5]  J. Denavit,et al.  A kinematic notation for lower pair mechanisms based on matrices , 1955 .

[6]  William K. Veitschegger,et al.  Robot accuracy analysis based on kinematics , 1986, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Jean-Luc Caenen,et al.  Identification of geometric and nongeometric parameters of robots , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  C. Melchiorri,et al.  Robot manipulability , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  William K. Veitschegger,et al.  Robot calibration and compensation , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Manipulability and force ellipsoids for continuum robot manipulators , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[11]  William L. Cleghorn,et al.  Effects of joint dynamics on the dynamic manipulability of geared robot manipulators , 2001 .

[12]  Yong-San Yoon,et al.  Trajectory planning of redundant robots by maximizing the moving acceleration radius , 1992, Robotica.

[13]  J. E. Kurek,et al.  Design of decoupled sliding mode control for the PUMA 560 robot manipulator , 2002, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control, 2002. RoMoCo '02..

[14]  Alan Bowling,et al.  Velocity Effects on Robotic Manipulator Dynamic Performance , 2006 .

[15]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  The actuation efficiency, a measure of acceleration capability for nonredundant robotic manipulators: Research Articles , 2005 .

[16]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  The dynamic capability equations: a new tool for analyzing robotic manipulator performance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[17]  Samad Hayati,et al.  Robot arm geometric link parameter estimation , 1983, The 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms , 1985 .

[19]  Bruce H. Krogh,et al.  The acceleration radius: a global performance measure for robotic manipulators , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[20]  Roderic A. Grupen,et al.  Velocity-dependent dynamic manipulability , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[21]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  The explicit dynamic model and inertial parameters of the PUMA 560 arm , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.