Studying Navigation as a Form of Interaction: a Design Approach for Social Robot Navigation Methods*

Social Navigation methods attempt to integrate knowledge from Human Sciences fields such as the notion of Proxemics into mobile robot navigation. They are often evaluated in simulations, or lab conditions with informed participants, and studies of the impact of the robot behavior on humans are rare. Humans communicate and interact through many vectors, among which are motion and positioning, which can be related to social hierarchy and the socio-physical context. If a robot is to be deployed among humans, the methods it uses should be designed with this in mind. This work acts as the first step in an ongoing project in which we explore how to design navigation methods for mobile robots destined to be deployed among humans. We aim to consider navigation as more than just a functionality of the robot, and to study the impact of robot motion on humans. In this paper, we focus on the person-following task. We selected a state of the art person-following method as the basis for our method, which we modified and extended in order for it to be more general and adaptable. We conducted pilot experiments using this method on a real mobile robot in ecological contexts. We used results from the experiments to study the Human-Robot Interaction as a whole by analysing both the person-following method and the human behavior. Our preliminary results show that the way in which the robot followed a person had an impact on the interaction that emerged between them.

[1]  Erwin Prassler,et al.  Motion coordination between a human and a mobile robot , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Manuel Lopes,et al.  Impact of Robot Initiative on Human-Robot Collaboration , 2017, HRI.

[3]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Investigating the ability to read others’ intentions using humanoid robots , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Autonomous person pacing and following with Model Predictive Equilibrium Point Control , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  E. Hall,et al.  Proxemics [and Comments and Replies] , 1968, Current Anthropology.

[6]  Véronique Aubergé,et al.  Multimodal breathiness in interaction: from breathy voice quality to global breathy “body behavior quality” , 2017 .

[7]  Helen Blood,et al.  Body Language and the Social Order: Communication as Behavioral Control , 1974 .

[8]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  How do people walk side-by-side? — Using a computational model of human behavior for a social robot , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  Michael J. White.  Interpersonal Distance as Affected by Room Size, Status, and Sex , 1975 .

[10]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Walking together , 2012, HRI 2014.

[11]  Yael Edan,et al.  Toward Socially Aware Person-Following Robots , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[12]  Thierry Fraichard,et al.  Human-Robot Motion: An attention-based navigation approach , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Kai Oliver Arras,et al.  Socially-aware robot navigation: A learning approach , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[15]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[16]  Amaury Nègre,et al.  HRI in an ecological dynamic experiment: The GEE corpus based approach for the Emox robot , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[17]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Model of Side-by-Side Walking Without the Robot Knowing the Goal , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[18]  David Feil-Seifer,et al.  Socially-aware navigation planner using models of human-human interaction , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[19]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Investigations on empathy towards humans and robots using fMRI , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Towards a Socially Acceptable Collision Avoidance for a Mobile Robot Navigating Among Pedestrians Using a Pedestrian Model , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[21]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Person tracking and following with 2D laser scanners , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[22]  Alberto Sanfeliu Cortés,et al.  On-line adaptive side-by-side human robot companion in dynamic urban environments , 2017, IROS 2017.

[23]  Thomas Bak,et al.  Adaptive Human-Aware Robot Navigation in Close Proximity to Humans , 2011 .

[24]  Anne Spalanzani.  Contribution à la navigation autonome en environnement dynamique et humain , 2015 .

[25]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Navigating between people: A stochastic optimization approach , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[26]  Patric Jensfelt,et al.  Human- and Situation-Aware People Following , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[27]  Wafa Johal,et al.  Starting engagement detection towards a companion robot using multimodal features , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[28]  Ailbhe Ní Chasaide,et al.  The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude , 2003, Speech Commun..

[29]  Thierry Fraichard,et al.  Human robot motion: A shared effort approach , 2017, 2017 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR).

[30]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Autonomous person following for telepresence robots , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[31]  Haibo He,et al.  A learning based approach for social force model parameter estimation , 2017, 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[32]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Destination Unknown: Walking Side-by-Side without Knowing the Goal , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[33]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Social Psychology and Human-Robot Interaction: An Uneasy Marriage , 2018, HRI.

[34]  Yuko Sasa.  Intelligence Socio-Affective pour un Robot: primitives langagières pour une interaction évolutive d'un robot de l'habitat intelligent. (Intelligence from Socio-Affects of Robot: Dialog Primitives for a Scalable Interaction with a Smart Home Robot) , 2018 .

[35]  Julie Carpenter,et al.  The Quiet Professional: An investigation of U.S. military Explosive Ordnance Disposal personnel interactions with everyday field robots , 2013 .

[36]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  Socially aware motion planning with deep reinforcement learning , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[37]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Robots learning how and where to approach people , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[38]  Takashi Minato,et al.  Does a Robot's Subtle Pause in Reaction Time to People's Touch Contribute to Positive Influences? * , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).