The role of holistic processing in face perception: Evidence from the face inversion effect

A large body of research supports the hypothesis that the human visual system does not process a face as a collection of separable facial features but as an integrated perceptual whole. One common assumption is that we quickly build holistic representations to extract useful second-order information provided by the variation between the faces of different individuals. An alternative account suggests holistic processing is a fast, early grouping process that first serves to distinguish faces from other competing objects. From this perspective, holistic processing is a quick initial response to the first-order information present in every face. To test this hypothesis we developed a novel paradigm for measuring the face inversion effect, a standard marker of holistic face processing, that measures the minimum exposure time required to discriminate between two stimuli. These new data demonstrate that holistic processing operates on whole upright faces, regardless of whether subjects are required to extract first- or second-level information. In light of this, we argue that holistic processing is a general mechanism that may occur at an earlier stage of face perception than individual discrimination to support the rapid detection of face stimuli in everyday visual scenes.

[1]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.

[2]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C. M. Mooney Age in the development of closure ability in children. , 1957, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  B. Renault,et al.  Face and shape repetition effects in humans: a spatio‐temporal ERP study , 1997, Neuroreport.

[6]  Kenji Kawano,et al.  Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[7]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Allison B Sekuler,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification Accuracy , 2010, Psychological science.

[9]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Object superiority: a comparison of complete and part probes. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[10]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[11]  P. Hancock,et al.  Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[13]  Nick Donnelly,et al.  The mental representations of faces and houses: Issues concerning parts and wholes , 1999 .

[14]  A. Young,et al.  Configural information in facial expression perception. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Mechanisms of face perception. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  So Kanazawa,et al.  Configural information in mother's face perception for infants , 2010 .

[17]  B. Rossion,et al.  Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: evidence from the face composite illusion. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[18]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  E. McKone Configural processing and face viewpoint. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  B. Rossion,et al.  Fixation Patterns During Recognition of Personally Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[21]  C. Jacques,et al.  The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[22]  S. Yamane,et al.  Population dynamics of face-responsive neurons in the inferior temporal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[24]  G. Hole,et al.  Evidence for Holistic Processing of Faces Viewed as Photographic Negatives , 1999, Perception.

[25]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[26]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[27]  S. Carey,et al.  Development of face recognition: A maturational component? , 1980 .

[28]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[29]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  T. Busey,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts , 2005, Vision Research.

[31]  J. Taubert Chimpanzee Faces are ‘Special’ to Humans , 2009, Perception.

[32]  M. Crossland,et al.  The effect of retinal image slip on peripheral visual acuity. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[33]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Watt,et al.  Biological "bar codes" in human faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[35]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[36]  E. McKone,et al.  Isolating the special component of face recognition: peripheral identification and a Mooney face. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[38]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Holistic Processing of Faces: Learning Effects with Mooney Faces , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[40]  D. Stuss,et al.  Effects of lateral lesions on medial activation during autobiographical remembering , 2010 .

[41]  R. Goebel,et al.  Holistic Face Categorization in Higher Order Visual Areas of the Normal and Prosopagnosic Brain: Toward a Non-Hierarchical View of Face Perception , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[42]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Face inversion impairs holistic perception: evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[44]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[45]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[47]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[48]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.

[51]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[53]  M. Iredale Two sides of the same Universe , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Dennis C. Hay,et al.  Configural information in face recognition , 1987 .

[55]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[56]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  William G Hayward,et al.  Holistic processing underlies gender judgments of faces , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[58]  G. Hole,et al.  Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.

[59]  B. Rossion Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[60]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[61]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[62]  C. Jacques,et al.  The Speed of Individual Face Categorization , 2006, Psychological science.

[63]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[64]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[65]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.1 Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? , 2022 .

[66]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[67]  B. Rossion Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[68]  C. Umilta,et al.  Face preference at birth. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  Sébastien M. Crouzet,et al.  Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. , 2010, Journal of vision.