Asymmetries in vowel perception

Asymmetries in vowel perception occur such that discrimination of a vowel change presented in one direction is easier compared to the same change presented in the reverse direction. Although such effects have been repeatedly reported in the literature there has been little effort to explain when or why they occur. We review studies that report asymmetries in vowel perception in infants and propose that these data indicate that babies are predisposed to respond differently to vowels that occupy different positions in the articulatory/acoustic vowel space (defined by F1-F2) such that the more peripheral vowel within a contrast serves as a reference or perceptual anchor. As such, these asymmetries reveal a language-universal perceptual bias that infants bring to the task of vowel discrimination. We present some new data that support our peripherality hypothesis and then compare the data on asymmetries in human infants with findings obtained with birds and cats. This comparison suggests that asymmetries evident in humans are unlikely to reflect general auditory mechanisms. Several important directions for further research are outlined and some potential implications of these asymmetries for understanding speech development are discussed.

[1]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[2]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  T. M. Nearey.  Phonetic feature systems for vowels , 1978 .

[4]  N. Cowan,et al.  The use of auditory and phonetic memory in vowel discrimination. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B. Lindblom.  Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .

[6]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  The Biology and Evolution of Language , 1984 .

[7]  P. Ladefoged.  Vowels and consonants : an introduction to the sounds of languages , 2001 .

[8]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[9]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Dale Terbeek.  WPP, No. 37: A Cross-language Multidimensional Scaling Study of Vowel Perception , 1977 .

[11]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Vowel Categorization by Very Young Infants. , 1992 .

[12]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[13]  P. Morse,et al.  Memory factors in vowel discrimination of normal and at-risk infants. , 1978, Child development.

[14]  Richard Wright,et al.  The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated. , 1993 .

[15]  N. Fox,et al.  Social perception in infants , 1985 .

[16]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[17]  J. Werker,et al.  Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. , 1997, Science.

[19]  R. Shepard.  Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects , 1974 .

[20]  P. Kuhl.  Speech perception in early infancy: perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  O. Bohn,et al.  A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[23]  E. Rosch.  The nature of mental codes for color categories. , 1975 .

[24]  A. Cutler.  Phonological cues to open- and closed-class words in the processing of spoken sentences , 1993, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[25]  Caroline L. Smith.  Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: a guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet (1999). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. ix+204. , 2000, Phonology.

[26]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  B. Repp,et al.  Stimulus order effects in vowel discrimination. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  R. Golinkoff,et al.  The Origins and Growth of Communication , 1984 .

[30]  Elzbieta B. Slawinski,et al.  Formant frequencies of vowels produced by infants with and without early onset otitis media , 1996 .

[31]  R D Hienz,et al.  Vowel discrimination in cats: acquisition, effects of stimulus level, and performance in noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Studies of similarity , 1978 .

[34]  P. Kuhl.  Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy , 1983 .

[35]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[36]  L Polka,et al.  Target spectral, dynamic spectral, and duration cues in infant perception of German vowels. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  P Iverson,et al.  Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Murray B. Sachs,et al.  Discrimination of steady‐state vowels by blackbirds and pigeons , 1981 .

[39]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Signal to syntax : bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition , 1996 .

[40]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Categorization of Speech by Infants: Support for Speech-Sound Prototypes. , 1989 .

[41]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive reference points , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  L Polka,et al.  Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  J. Sussman,et al.  Further tests of the "perceptual magnet effect" in the perception of [i]: identification and change/no-change discrimination. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Phonetic development in identical twins differing in auditory function. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[45]  P. Morse,et al.  Continuous vowel discrimination in normal and at risk infants. , 1976, Child development.

[46]  Francisco Lacerda,et al.  Sonority contrasts dominate young infants’ vowel perception , 1993 .

[47]  B H Repp,et al.  Categories and context in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  N. Ratner.  Patterns of vowel modification in mother–child speech , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[49]  J. Werker,et al.  Six-Month-Old Infants' Preference for Lexical Words , 2001, Psychological science.

[50]  Laurel J. Trainor,et al.  Fundamental frequency influences vowel discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 1998 .

[51]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Acoustic features of infant vocalic utterances at 3, 6, and 9 months. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.