Optimal coding through divisive normalization models of V1 neurons

Current models of the primary visual cortex (V1) include a linear filtering stage followed by a gain control mechanism that explains some of the nonlinear behaviour of neurons. This nonlinear stage consists of a divisive normalization in which each linear response is squared and then divided by a weighted sum of squared linear responses in a certain neighbourhood plus a constant. Simoncelli and Schwartz (1999 Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 11 153–9) have suggested that divisive normalization reduces the statistical dependence between neuron responses when the weights are adapted to the statistics of natural images, which is consistent with the efficient coding hypothesis. Nevertheless, there are still important open issues, such as, for example, how to obtain the values for the parameters that minimize statistical dependence? Does divisive normalization give a total independence between responses? In this paper, we present the general mathematical formulation of the first of these two questions. We arrive at an expression which permits us to compute, numerically, the parameters of a quasi-optimal solution adapted to an input set of natural images. This quasi-optimal solution is based on a Gaussian model of the conditional statistics of the coefficients resulting from projecting natural images onto an orthogonal linear basis. Our results show, in general, lower values of mutual information, that is, responses are more independent than those provided by previous approximations.

[1]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[2]  A. G. Greenhill,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, , 1971 .

[3]  S. Laughlin A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[4]  A. B. Bonds Role of Inhibition in the Specification of Orientation Selectivity of Cells in the Cat Striate Cortex , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Marcus,et al.  A Survey of Matrix Theory and Matrix Inequalities , 1965 .

[6]  R. J. Martin Approximations to the determinant term in gaussian maximum likelihood estimation of some spatial models , 1992 .

[7]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? , 1994, Neural Computation.

[9]  W. Bialek,et al.  Naturalistic stimuli increase the rate and efficiency of information transmission by primary auditory afferents , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[11]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[12]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[14]  J A Solomon,et al.  Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Modeling Surround Suppression in V1 Neurons with a Statistically Derived Normalization Model , 1998, NIPS.

[17]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Scale Mixtures of Gaussians and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1999, NIPS.

[18]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  PROBABILISTIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE ADAPTATION AND COMPARISON OF IMAGE CODES , 1999 .

[19]  Francesc J. Ferri,et al.  Perceptually and statistically decorrelated features for image representation: application to transform coding , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[20]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and divisive normalization: Modeling nonlinearity and adaptation in cortical neurons , 2002 .

[23]  R. Navarro,et al.  Input–output statistical independence in divisive normalization models of V1 neurons , 2003, Network.

[24]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  A theory of maximizing sensory information , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.