Assembling a Field into Place: Smart-City Development in Japan

Abstract We examine the concept of ‘organisational fields’, a notion employed frequently, but at times with inconsistency, to describe supra-industrial conglomerations of organisations with a mutual interest. We find this concept analytically useful in today’s world of rapid technological change and of organisations searching for business across industry boundaries. With our study of smart-city development in Japan, we provide an alternative theory to the predominant socio-cognitive explanations of how organisational fields emerge. Based on our empirical case, the drivers for the early development of an organisational field are concrete organisational actions to assemble the tangible objects of the new field.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[3]  Raghu Garud,et al.  A Socio-Cognitive Model of Technology Evolution: The Case of Cochlear Implants , 2015 .

[4]  Huseyin Leblebici,et al.  Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry , 1991 .

[5]  Shahzad Ansari,et al.  Text Me! New Consumer Practices and Change in Organizational Fields , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Prospects for Organization Theory in the Early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[7]  R. Hollands.  Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[8]  T. Reay,et al.  Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics , 2009 .

[9]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[10]  R. David,et al.  WHEN FASHION IS FLEETING: TRANSITORY COLLECTIVE BELIEFS AND THE DYNAMICS OF TQM CONSULTING , 2006 .

[11]  M. Miles,et al.  The Qualitative Researcher's Companion , 2002 .

[12]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[13]  A. Wright.  Domination in Organizational Fields: It’s Just Not Cricket , 2009 .

[14]  Dimitris Syvridis,et al.  Smart City Surveillance Through Low-Cost Fiber Sensors in Metropolitan Optical Networks , 2014 .

[15]  D. Mcadam,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields* , 2010 .

[16]  Emmanouil Tranos,et al.  Smart networked cities? , 2012 .

[17]  David Bianchini,et al.  Smart Cities and Their Smart Decisions: Ethical Considerations , 2014, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[18]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies , 2012 .

[19]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[20]  C. Lévi-Strauss.  The Savage Mind , 1967 .

[21]  S. Furnari.  Interstitial Spaces: Microinteraction Settings and the Genesis of New Practices Between Institutional Fields , 2014 .

[22]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[23]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[24]  R. Suddaby.  Challenges for Institutional Theory , 2010 .

[25]  Margarita Angelidou,et al.  Smart city policies: A spatial approach , 2014 .

[26]  C. Hardy,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada , 2004 .

[27]  Michael Lounsbury,et al.  New Practice Creation: An Institutional Perspective on Innovation , 2007 .

[28]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[29]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Bourdieu and organizational analysis , 2008 .

[30]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .

[31]  J. Martin,et al.  What Is Field Theory?1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  R. Friedland.  Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[33]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work , 2010 .