Fechner’s Law in Metacognition: A Quantitative Model of Visual Working Memory Confidence

Although visual working memory (VWM) has been studied extensively, it is unknown how people form confidence judgments about their memories. Peirce (1878) speculated that Fechner’s law—which states that sensation is proportional to the logarithm of stimulus intensity—might apply to confidence reports. Based on this idea, we hypothesize that humans map the precision of their VWM contents to a confidence rating through Fechner’s law. We incorporate this hypothesis into the best available model of VWM encoding and fit it to data from a delayed-estimation experiment. The model provides an excellent account of human confidence rating distributions as well as the relation between performance and confidence. Moreover, the best-fitting mapping in a model with a highly flexible mapping closely resembles the logarithmic mapping, suggesting that no alternative mapping exists that accounts better for the data than Fechner’s law. We propose a neural implementation of the model and find that this model also fits the behavioral data well. Furthermore, we find that jointly fitting memory errors and confidence ratings boosts the power to distinguish previously proposed VWM encoding models by a factor of 5.99 compared to fitting only memory errors. Finally, we show that Fechner’s law also accounts for metacognitive judgments in a word recognition memory task, which is a first indication that it may be a general law in metacognition. Our work presents the first model to jointly account for errors and confidence ratings in VWM and could lay the groundwork for understanding the computational mechanisms of metacognition.

[1]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  A Tutorial on Fisher Information , 2017, 1705.01064.

[2]  Weiwei Zhang,et al.  A dual-trace model for visual sensory memory. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Paul M. Bays,et al.  A signature of neural coding at human perceptual limits , 2016, bioRxiv.

[4]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Confidence and certainty: distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Wolpert,et al.  A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence , 2015, eLife.

[6]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Choice Certainty Is Informed by Both Evidence and Decision Time , 2014, Neuron.

[7]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Neural coding of uncertainty and probability. , 2014, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Charles S. Peirce,et al.  Illustrations of the Logic of Science , 2014 .

[9]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Partitioning neuronal variability , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[11]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Accuracy and Confidence of Visual Short-Term Memory Do Not Go Hand-In-Hand: Behavioral and Neural Dissociations , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Noise in Neural Populations Accounts for Errors in Working Memory , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  W. Ma,et al.  Changing concepts of working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  W. Ma,et al.  Factorial comparison of working memory models. , 2014, Psychological review.

[15]  E. Vogel,et al.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  V. Smith,et al.  A Direct Test of the , 2013 .

[17]  Iain M Harlow,et al.  Source accuracy data reveal the thresholded nature of human episodic memory , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Irida Mance,et al.  Visual working memory. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[19]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Metacognition of Visual Short-Term Memory: Dissociation between Objective and Subjective Components of VSTM , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[20]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  No Evidence for an Item Limit in Change Detection , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  R. Dolan,et al.  Confidence in value-based choice , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Frank Tong,et al.  Introspective judgments predict the precision and likelihood of successful maintenance of visual working memory. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[23]  Vivek K. Goyal,et al.  A framework for Bayesian optimality of psychophysical laws , 2012, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[24]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  Variability in the quality of visual working memory , 2012, Nature Communications.

[25]  R. Jacobs,et al.  An ideal observer analysis of visual working memory. , 2012, Psychological review.

[26]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Probabilistic Computation in Human Perception under Variability in Encoding Precision , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  R. Dolan,et al.  The neural basis of metacognitive ability , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  H. Lau,et al.  A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[30]  Hang Zhang,et al.  Ubiquitous Log Odds: A Common Representation of Probability and Frequency Distortion in Perception, Action, and Cognition , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[31]  Thomas S Wallsten,et al.  A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition. , 2012, Psychological review.

[32]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA , 2011 .

[33]  P. Juslin,et al.  Reducing cognitive biases in probabilistic reasoning by the use of logarithm formats , 2011, Cognition.

[34]  M. Cohen,et al.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Hierarchical Encoding in Visual Working Memory , 2010, Psychological science.

[37]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Cost Functions, with Application to Active User Modeling and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning , 2010, ArXiv.

[38]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Signal detection theory, uncertainty, and Poisson-like population codes , 2010, Vision Research.

[39]  R. Dolan,et al.  Effects of loss aversion on post-decision wagering: Implications for measures of awareness , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[40]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Encoding higher-order structure in visual working memory: A probabilistic model , 2010 .

[41]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Likelihood ratio decisions in memory: Three implied regularities , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex , 2009, Science.

[43]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[44]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Conservatism in a Simple Probability Inference Task , 2008 .

[45]  A. Seth.  Post-decision wagering measures metacognitive content, not sensory consciousness , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[46]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[47]  Shane T. Mueller,et al.  Decision noise: An explanation for observed violations of signal detection theory , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[49]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[50]  John T Wixted,et al.  A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[51]  A. Cowey,et al.  Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  J. Wixted.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[53]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Laurence T Maloney,et al.  Kin recognition and the perceived facial similarity of children. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[55]  Chen Shuo.  The Capacity of Visual Working Memory for Motion Direction of Objects , 2006 .

[56]  Charles Audet,et al.  Mesh Adaptive Direct Search Algorithms for Constrained Optimization , 2006, SIAM J. Optim..

[57]  W. Ma,et al.  A detection theory account of change detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[58]  M. Paradiso,et al.  A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[59]  R. Zemel,et al.  Inference and computation with population codes. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[60]  J. Gold,et al.  Banburismus and the Brain Decoding the Relationship between Sensory Stimuli, Decisions, and Reward , 2002, Neuron.

[61]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[63]  G. Fechner.  Elemente der Psychophysik , 1998 .

[64]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[65]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[66]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves. , 1992, Psychological review.

[67]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[68]  J. Palmer.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[70]  H. Barlow.  Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[71]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[72]  W. Edwards,et al.  Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[73]  S. S. Stevens.  On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[74]  E M BIETSCH,et al.  Changing concepts. , 1957, The Canadian nurse.