The neuroscience of social understanding

How do we understand and engage with the purposeful, emotional and mental activities of other people and how does this knowledge develop? What can recent work on mirror neurons in monkeys and human beings teach us about how the brain supports social understanding? According to Intentional Relations Theory (Barresi and Moore 1996), the understanding of the self-other equivalence requires concurrent knowledge of mind from both a first- and a third-person point of view and that any mental concept must directly match and link these two ways of knowing it. In this chapter we will argue that Intentional Relations Theory is consistent with and can help interpret recent neurophysiological findings on “mirror neurons” that fire equivalently for intentional relations (i.e., object-directed actions, emotions, and mental activities) of self and other.

[1]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Placebo-Induced Changes in fMRI in the Anticipation and Experience of Pain , 2004, Science.

[2]  J. Sommerville,et al.  Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions , 2005, Cognition.

[3]  F. Bermpohl,et al.  Cortical midline structures and the self , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  R. Gordon.  Folk Psychology as Simulation , 1986 .

[5]  Jennifer H. Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  L. Fogassi,et al.  A Touching Sight SII/PV Activation during the Observation and Experience of Touch , 2004, Neuron.

[7]  A. Leslie.  Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[8]  H. Sackeim,et al.  Parietal cortex and representation of the mental Self. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Woodward.  The infant origins of intentional understanding. , 2005, Advances in child development and behavior.

[10]  A. Woodward.  Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach , 1998, Cognition.

[11]  P. Harris.  Children and emotion , 1989 .

[12]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  12- and 18-month-old infants follow gaze to spaces behind barriers. , 2004, Developmental science.

[13]  J. Decety,et al.  The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behavior , 2006, Brain Research.

[14]  P. Hobson,et al.  The Cradle of Thought , 2002 .

[15]  Dana Samson,et al.  Seeing it my way: a case of a selective deficit in inhibiting self-perspective. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[17]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Out-of-body experience, heautoscopy, and autoscopic hallucination of neurological origin Implications for neurocognitive mechanisms of corporeal awareness and self-consciousness , 2005, Brain Research Reviews.

[19]  J. Barresi.  John Barresi INTENTIONAL RELATIONS AND DIVERGENT PERSPECTIVES IN SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING , 2000 .

[20]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain , 2004, Science.

[21]  K. Yau,et al.  Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  Rp Hobson.  The intersubjective foundations of thought , 1998 .

[23]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  A. Lock.  Action, gesture, and symbol : the emergence of language , 1978 .

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  J. Barresi.  Extending Self-Consciousness Into the Future , 2001 .

[27]  R. Miall,et al.  A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Jordan Zlatev,et al.  The co-evolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis , 2008 .

[29]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  J. Stevenson.  The cultural origins of human cognition , 2001 .

[31]  M. Tomasello.  First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[32]  P. Hobson,et al.  The cradle of thought : exploring the origins of thinking , 2004 .

[33]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  The mirror system and joint action , 2002 .

[34]  A. Gopnik.  How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  A. Damasio.  The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness , 1999 .

[36]  T. Matsuzawa.  Comparative cognitive development. , 2007, Developmental science.

[37]  Chris Moore,et al.  Representing Intentional Relations and Acting Intentionally in Infancy: Current Insights and Open Questions , 2006 .

[38]  W. Prinz.  Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[39]  J. Sommerville,et al.  Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  M. Iacoboni.  Understanding Others: Imitation, Language, Empathy , 2002 .

[41]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  Beyond simulation? Neural mechanisms for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  A. Goldman.  In Defense of the Simulation Theory , 1992 .

[43]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice , 2008 .

[45]  C. Moore,et al.  Intentional relations and social understanding , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals: A neural architecture for imitation and intentional relations , 2007 .

[47]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Frontal and Temporo-Parietal Lobe Contributions to Theory of Mind: Neuropsychological Evidence from a False-Belief Task with Reduced Language and Executive Demands , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others , 2006, Nature.

[50]  Intentional relations and triadic interactions , 1999 .

[51]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula The Common Neural Basis of Seeing and Feeling Disgust , 2003, Neuron.

[52]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  U. Frith,et al.  Egocentrism, allocentrism, and Asperger syndrome , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[54]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation highlights the sensorimotor side of empathy for pain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Tania Singer,et al.  The painful side of empathy , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  Dana Samson,et al.  Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  R. Hobson,et al.  Against the theory of ‘Theory of Mind’ , 1991 .

[58]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  A. Leslie.  Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind." , 1987 .

[60]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Early reasoning about desires: evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[61]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Pain-related neurons in the human cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  C. Moore.  Understanding self and others in the second year , 2007 .