Classification of functional brain images with a spatio-temporal dissimilarity map

Classification of subjects into predefined groups, such as patient vs. control, based on their functional MRI data is a potentially useful procedure for clinical diagnostic purposes. This paper presents an automated method for classifying subjects into groups based on their functional MRI data. The proposed methodology provides general framework using preprocessed time series for the whole brain volume. Using a training set of two groups of subjects, the new methodology identifies spatio-temporal features that distinguish the groups and uses these features to categorize new subjects. We demonstrate the method using simulations and a clinical application that classifies individuals into schizotypy and control groups.

[1]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Cognition and control in schizophrenia: a computational model of dopamine and prefrontal function , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Application of time series techniques to data mining and analysis of spatial patterns in 3D images , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[3]  J. Cohen,et al.  Selective deficits in prefrontal cortex function in medication-naive patients with schizophrenia. , 2001, Archives of general psychiatry.

[4]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Group analysis in functional neuroimaging: selecting subjects using similarity measures , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  J. I The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.

[6]  Fillia Makedon,et al.  Patient Classification of fMRI Activation Maps , 2003, MICCAI.

[7]  Karl Zilles,et al.  Automated quality assurance routines for fMRI data applied to a multicenter study , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[9]  J. Baron,et al.  FDG-PET measurement is more accurate than neuropsychological assessments to predict global cognitive deterioration in patients with mild cognitive impairment , 2005, Neurocase.

[10]  Gregory A. Miller,et al.  Paying attention to emotion: , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  U. Böckenholt,et al.  Bootstrapping: applications to psychophysiology. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[12]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Marie T Banich,et al.  Neural mechanisms of affective interference in schizotypy. , 2005, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Machine learning for clinical diagnosis from functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[15]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Hernando Ombao,et al.  Comparing extent of activation: a robust permutation approach , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  Piotr Bogorodzki,et al.  Structural group classification technique based on regional fMRI BOLD responses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Hernando Ombao,et al.  Statistical tests for fMRI based on experimental randomization , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Jüptner,et al.  Review: Does Measurement of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Reflect Synaptic Activity?—Implications for PET and fMRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[20]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[22]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images , 2004, Machine Learning.

[23]  C. S. Carter,et al.  Context processing deficits associated with hypofrontality in the healthy relatives of schizophrenia patients: An event-related FMRI study , 2003, Schizophrenia Research.

[24]  P. Robert,et al.  A Unifying Tool for Linear Multivariate Statistical Methods: The RV‐Coefficient , 1976 .

[25]  N. Cohen,et al.  The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  L J Chapman,et al.  Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[27]  J. Cohen,et al.  Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. , 1992, Psychological review.

[28]  E. Pitman Significance Tests Which May be Applied to Samples from Any Populations , 1937 .

[29]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  Body-image aberration in Schizophrenia. , 1978, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[30]  Robert H. Berk Assignment Methods in Combinatorial Data Analysis , 1989 .

[31]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[32]  S C Strother,et al.  Comparison of voxel- and volume-of-interest-based analyses in FDG PET scans of HIV positive and healthy individuals. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  Zoran Obradovic,et al.  Subjective Probability , 1994 .

[34]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Detecting discriminative functional MRI activation patterns using space filling curves , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[35]  C. Carter,et al.  The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[36]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods , 2003, NeuroImage.