Sound Processing Hierarchy within Human Auditory Cortex

Both attention and masking sounds can alter auditory neural processes and affect auditory signal perception. In the present study, we investigated the complex effects of auditory-focused attention and the signal-to-noise ratio of sound stimuli on three different auditory evoked field components (auditory steady-state response, N1m, and sustained field) by means of magnetoencephalography. The results indicate that the auditory steady-state response originating in primary auditory cortex reflects the signal-to-noise ratio of physical sound inputs (bottom–up process) rather than the listener's attentional state (top–down process), whereas the sustained field, originating in nonprimary auditory cortex, reflects the attentional state rather than the signal-to-noise ratio. The N1m was substantially influenced by both bottom–up and top–down neural processes. The differential sensitivity of the components to bottom–up and top–down neural processes, contingent on their level in the processing pathway, suggests a stream from bottom–up driven sensory neural processing to top–down driven auditory perception within human auditory cortex.

[1]  L. M. Kitzes,et al.  Intrinsic inter- and intralaminar connections and their relationship to the tonotopic map in cat primary auditory cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Non-invasive long-term recordings of cortical ‘direct current’ (DC–) activity in humans using magnetoencephalography , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  S. David,et al.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1? , 2007, Hearing Research.

[4]  T. Elbert,et al.  Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Modification of neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex by masking sounds , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  S. David,et al.  Auditory attention : focusing the searchlight on sound , 2007 .

[7]  O. Salonen,et al.  Brain networks of bottom-up triggered and top-down controlled shifting of auditory attention , 2009, Brain Research.

[8]  M. Ahissar,et al.  Low-Level Information and High-Level Perception: The Case of Speech in Noise , 2008, PLoS biology.

[9]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  H. Scheich,et al.  A multilevel and cross-modal approach towards neuronal mechanisms of auditory streaming , 2008, Brain Research.

[11]  C. Pantev,et al.  Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses , 1996, Hearing Research.

[12]  T. Picton,et al.  The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[13]  Winfried Schlee,et al.  Top-Down Modulation of the Auditory Steady-State Response in a Task-Switch Paradigm , 2008, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  R. Burkard.  Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2010 .

[15]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Cortical processing of degraded speech sounds: Effects of distortion type and continuity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  Christian J. Sumner,et al.  Examining the role of frequency specificity in the enhancement and suppression of human cortical activity by auditory selective attention , 2009, Hearing Research.

[17]  Alexander Gutschalk,et al.  Comparison of auditory deficits associated with neglect and auditory cortex lesions , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Koji Inui,et al.  Auditory sustained field responses to periodic noise , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[20]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Neural substrates for dividing and focusing attention between simultaneous auditory and visual events , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Effects of Selective Attention on the Electrophysiological Representation of Concurrent Sounds in the Human Auditory Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Sustained Magnetic Fields Reveal Separate Sites for Sound Level and Temporal Regularity in Human Auditory Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  F. Bloom,et al.  Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Hiroshi Shibasaki,et al.  Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans , 2006, Brain Research.

[27]  E. Yund,et al.  Attentional modulation of human auditory cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Eggermont,et al.  The Neurophysiology of Auditory Perception: From Single Units to Evoked Potentials , 2002, Audiology and Neurotology.

[29]  M. Bar,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[30]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state evoked potentials during selective attention. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  R Hari,et al.  Evidence for cortical origin of the 40 Hz auditory evoked response in man. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  David Rotermund,et al.  Attention Improves Object Representation in Visual Cortical Field Potentials , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  J M Badier,et al.  Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Steady-state responses in MEG demonstrate information integration within but not across the auditory and visual senses , 2011, NeuroImage.

[36]  J. Eggermont.  Between sound and perception: reviewing the search for a neural code , 2001, Hearing Research.

[37]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[38]  C. Pantev,et al.  Interhemispheric support during demanding auditory signal-in-noise processing. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Teemu Rinne,et al.  Functional Maps of Human Auditory Cortex: Effects of Acoustic Features and Attention , 2009, PloS one.

[40]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Left hemispheric dominance during auditory processing in a noisy environment , 2007, BMC Biology.

[41]  C Pantev,et al.  Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  J. Simon,et al.  Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  G. Mangun.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[44]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  John Duncan,et al.  Shape-specific preparatory activity mediates attention to targets in human visual cortex , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Teemu Rinne,et al.  Attention modulates sound processing in human auditory cortex but not the inferior colliculus , 2007, Neuroreport.

[47]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Attention Modulates Earliest Responses in the Primary Auditory and Visual Cortices , 2008, Neuron.

[48]  H. Kornhuber,et al.  Distribution of readiness potential, pre-motion positivity, and motor potential of the human cerebral cortex preceding voluntary finger movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  C. Pantev,et al.  Attention Improves Population-Level Frequency Tuning in Human Auditory Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  C. Pantev,et al.  Frequency-specific modulation of population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[51]  Almut Engelien,et al.  A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices , 2000, Hearing Research.

[52]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Neural Correlates of Auditory Perceptual Awareness under Informational Masking , 2008, PLoS biology.

[53]  S. Makeig,et al.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  M Hoke,et al.  The auditory evoked sustained field: origin and frequency dependence. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[55]  M Hämäläinen,et al.  Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Auditory selective attention modulates activation of human inferior colliculus. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  C Pantev,et al.  Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[59]  S Makeig,et al.  Physiological studies of central masking in man. I: The effects of noise on the 40-Hz steady-state response. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  A. Rees,et al.  Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man , 1986, Hearing Research.

[61]  Giri P. Krishnan,et al.  The effect of selective attention on the gamma-band auditory steady-state response , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.