The Size and Number of Plaid Blobs Mediate the Misperception of Type-II Plaid Direction

The misperceived direction of type-II plaids has posed a problem for the intersection of constraints (IOC) model of two-dimensional motion perception. Alais et al. (1994, Vision Research, 34, 1823-1834) examined the perceived direction of type-II plaids and concluded that in addition to the direction signalled by the IOC process, a monocular mechanism signalling the motion of plaid features (blobs) is also involved in plaid perception. It was shown that the prominence of this monocular signal in plaid direction judgements depended on several variables, and the notion of blob "optimality" was introduced. This explained the more veridical direction of "optimal" blob plaids in terms of their more effectively activating the proposed feature-sensitive motion mechanism. One distinction between "optimal" and "non-optimal" blob plaids is their different component spatial frequencies, which necessarily entails a difference in the number and size of the blobs and thus raises potential confounds, since both the nature of the blobs and the components differ, which might affect the postulated blob mechanism and/or the IOC process. In the present paper, by offsetting changes in spatial frequency with changes in aperture size so that blob number is held constant, we examine whether differences in sheer blob number or size can alter perceived type-II plaid direction. The results reveal effects of both blob number and blob size, and their implications for the underlying mechanism are considered. Alternative accounts of the results in terms of the IOC model or revisions of it cannot explain the data. Comparison of monocular and binocular conditions adds further systematic evidence in support of the monocularity of the feature-sensitive motion mechanism.

[1]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  Darren Burke,et al.  The contribution of one-dimensional motion mechanisms to the perceived direction of drifting plaids and their aftereffects , 1994, Vision Research.

[3]  E. Wist,et al.  The spatial frequency effect on perceived velocity , 1976, Vision Research.

[4]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[5]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Monocular mechanisms determine plaid motion coherence , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[6]  H R Wilson,et al.  A model for motion coherence and transparency , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[7]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977 .

[8]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[9]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Receptive-field properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area (MT) of owl monkeys. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Darren Burke,et al.  Determinants of two-dimensional motion aftereffects induced by simultaneously- and alternately-presented plaid components , 1993, Vision Research.

[11]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Detecting the displacements of spatial beats: A monocular capability , 1987, Vision Research.

[12]  H. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns , 1990, Vision Research.

[13]  Darren Burke,et al.  A Role for a low level mechanism in determining plaid coherence , 1994, Vision Research.

[14]  Darren Burke,et al.  Further evidence for monocular determinants of perceived plaid direction , 1996, Vision Research.

[15]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Spatial Frequency Selectivity of a Visual Tilt Illusion , 1973, Nature.

[16]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. , 1979, Science.

[17]  R. Tootell,et al.  Functional anatomy of the second visual area (V2) in the macaque , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[19]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Role of the Blobs in Determining the Perception of Drifting Plaids and Their Motion Aftereffects , 1994, Perception.

[20]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  The effect of interactions between one-dimensional component gratings on two-dimensional motion perception , 1993, Vision Research.

[21]  J. van Santen,et al.  Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  S Ullman,et al.  Artificial intelligence and the brain: computational studies of the visual system. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  M Georgeson.  Orientation bandwidth of motion perception , 1994 .

[25]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  The tilt illusion: Repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian , 1977, Vision Research.

[26]  R. Andersen,et al.  Integration of motion and stereopsis in middle temporal cortical area of macaques , 1995, Nature.

[27]  M. Silverman,et al.  Functional organization of the second cortical visual area in primates. , 1983, Science.

[28]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  B I O'Toole,et al.  Exposure-Time and Spatial-Frequency Effects in the Tilt Illusion , 1979, Perception.

[30]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Lateral Inhibition between Orientation Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1970, Nature.