On the evolutionary origins of equity

Equity, defined as reward according to contribution, is considered a central aspect of human fairness in both philosophical debates and scientific research. Despite large amounts of research on the evolutionary origins of fairness, the evolutionary rationale behind equity is still unknown. Here, we investigate how equity can be understood in the context of the cooperative environment in which humans evolved. We model a population of individuals who cooperate to produce and divide a resource, and choose their cooperative partners based on how they are willing to divide the resource. Agent-based simulations, an analytical model, and extended simulations using neural networks provide converging evidence that equity is the best evolutionary strategy in such an environment: individuals maximize their fitness by dividing benefits in proportion to their own and their partners’ relative contribution. The need to be chosen as a cooperative partner thus creates a selection pressure strong enough to explain the evolution of preferences for equity. We discuss the limitations of our model, the discrepancies between its predictions and empirical data, and how interindividual and intercultural variability fit within this framework.

[1]  T. Killingback,et al.  Spatial Ultimatum Games, collaborations and the evolution of fairness , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Li Wang,et al.  Impact of Degree Heterogeneity on Attack Vulnerability of Interdependent Networks , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[3]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Egalitarian motives in humans , 2007, Nature.

[4]  P. Hammerstein,et al.  Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  A. Fiske The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[6]  Steffen Huck,et al.  The Indirect Evolutionary Approach to Explaining Fair Allocations , 1999 .

[7]  J. Bräuer,et al.  Fairness in Non-human Primates? , 2012, Social Justice Research.

[8]  R. Trivers Reciprocal altruism: 30 years later , 2006 .

[9]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[10]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[11]  Adams Js Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[12]  J. Call,et al.  Lack of prosociality in great apes, capuchin monkeys and spider monkeys: convergent evidence from two different food distribution tasks , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere , 2015, Psychological science.

[14]  Michael Gurven,et al.  The Natural History of Human Food Sharing and Cooperation: A Review and a New Multi-Individual Approach to the Negotiation of Norms , 2001 .

[15]  M. Gurven To give and to give not: The behavioral ecology of human food transfers , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  Bargaining and Markets , 1991 .

[17]  J. S. Adams,et al.  EFFECTS OF WAGE INEQUITIES ON WORK QUALITY. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[18]  K. Taylor Natural justice. , 1998, The Lamp.

[19]  R. Nesse Runaway Social Selection for Displays of Partner Value and Altruism , 2007 .

[20]  Samuel M. Scheiner,et al.  The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. V. Evolution of reaction norm shape , 1993 .

[21]  C. Chevallier,et al.  Early Understanding of Merit in Turkana Children , 2013 .

[22]  Jeffrey L. Krichmar,et al.  Evolutionary robotics: The biology, intelligence, and technology of self-organizing machines , 2001, Complex..

[23]  Pat Barclay,et al.  Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment , 2006 .

[24]  C. Chevallier,et al.  Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[25]  Bargaining games with a random sequence of who makes the offers , 1987 .

[26]  Pat Barclay,et al.  Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game , 2014, Biology Letters.

[27]  Barbara A. Mellers,et al.  Equity judgment: A revision of Aristotelian views. , 1982 .

[28]  Pat Barclay Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans , 2013 .

[29]  J. André,et al.  Social opportunities and the evolution of fairness. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Aristotle,et al.  THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS , 1990 .

[31]  James Konow,et al.  Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories , 2003 .

[32]  C. A. Aktipis,et al.  Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? Simple Walk Away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups. , 2011, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[33]  L. Surian,et al.  The developmental roots of fairness: infants' reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. , 2011, Developmental science.

[34]  Hirofumi Takesue Partner selection and emergence of the merit-based equity norm. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  B. Hood,et al.  The Effect of Creative Labor on Property-Ownership Transfer by Preschool Children and Adults , 2010, Psychological science.

[36]  D. Sperber,et al.  A mutualistic approach to morality , 2011 .

[37]  Chengyi Xia,et al.  Reduced synchronizability of dynamical scale-free networks with onion-like topologies , 2015, Appl. Math. Comput..

[38]  Henry F. Lyle,et al.  The reputational and social network benefits of prosociality in an Andean community , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation , 1999 .

[40]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Evolutionary Robotics: The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-Organizing Machines , 2000 .

[41]  N. Frohlich,et al.  Modeling Other-Regarding Preferences and an Experimental Test , 2004 .

[42]  E. Fehr A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[43]  P. Hammerstein,et al.  Economics in nature : social dilemmas, mate choice and biological markets , 2001 .

[44]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  Explaining moral religions , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  Colin Camerer,et al.  “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility , 2010 .

[47]  J. André,et al.  Evolution of equal division among unequal partners , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  J. S. Adams,et al.  TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[49]  M. Nowak,et al.  Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. , 2000, Science.

[50]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[51]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[52]  C Athena Aktipis,et al.  Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[53]  G. W. Walster,et al.  New directions in equity research. , 1973 .

[54]  G. Roberts,et al.  Reputation-based partner choice is an effective alternative to indirect reciprocity in solving social dilemmas , 2013 .

[55]  Patrick Forber,et al.  The evolution of fairness through spite , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  Pat Barclay Competitive helping increases with the size of biological markets and invades defection. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[57]  David G. Rand,et al.  Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game , 1995 .

[59]  E. Walster,et al.  REACTIONS TO CONFIRMATIONS AND DISCONFIRMATIONS OF EXPECTANCIES OF EQUITY AND INEQUITY , 1974 .

[60]  J. Sommerville,et al.  Fairness Expectations and Altruistic Sharing in 15-Month-Old Human Infants , 2011, PloS one.

[61]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[62]  E. Hoebel,et al.  The law of primitive man : a study in comparative legal dynamics , 1955 .

[63]  L. Skitka Cross-Disciplinary Conversations: A Psychological Perspective on Justice Research with Non-human Animals , 2012 .

[64]  R. Kurzban,et al.  Concordance & Conflict in Intuitions of Justice , 2006 .

[65]  Karthik Panchanathan,et al.  The Evolution of Giving, Sharing, and Lotteries , 2011, Current Anthropology.

[66]  D. Sperber,et al.  A mutualistic approach to morality: the evolution of fairness by partner choice. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[67]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Do Infants Have a Sense of Fairness? , 2012, Psychological science.

[68]  M. Nowak,et al.  Empathy leads to fairness , 2002, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[69]  R. Bird,et al.  Prosocial signaling and cooperation among Martu hunters , 2015 .

[70]  Pat Barclay,et al.  Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[71]  M. Nowak,et al.  The spatial ultimatum game , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[72]  Pat Barclay Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the ''tragedy of the commons'' , 2004 .

[73]  Paul L. Hooper,et al.  The evolutionary and ecological roots of human social organization , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  M. Sahlins Stone Age Economics , 2020 .

[75]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior as Exchange , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[76]  Veröffentlichungsversion,et al.  The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life , 2022 .

[77]  G. Roberts Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[78]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[79]  A. Houston,et al.  The coevolution of choosiness and cooperation , 2008, Nature.

[80]  G. Cohen Why Not Socialism , 2009 .

[81]  M. Alvard Carcass ownership and meat distribution by big-game cooperative hunters , 2002 .

[82]  J. André,et al.  Partner choice creates fairness in humans , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[83]  Elliot Turiel,et al.  The Culture of Morality: Social Development, Context, and Conflict , 2002 .

[84]  Carole B. Burgoyne,et al.  What is and what ought to be: Popular beliefs about distributive justice in thirteen countries , 1999 .