A novel ANCOVA design for analysis of MEG data with application to a visual attention study

Statistical inference from MEG-based distributed activation maps is well suited to the general linear modeling framework, a standard approach to the analysis of fMRI and PET neuroimaging studies. However, there are important differences from the other neuroimaging modalities related to how observations are created and fitted in GLM models, as well as how subsequent statistical inference is performed. In this paper, we demonstrate how MEG oscillatory components can be analyzed in this framework based on a custom ANCOVA model that takes into account baseline and inter-hemispheric effects, rather than a simpler ANOVA design. We present the methodology using as an example an MEG study of visual spatial attention, since the model design depends on the specific experiment and neuroscience hypotheses being tested. However, the techniques presented here can be readily adapted to accommodate other experimental paradigms. We create statistics that estimate the temporal evolution of attention effects on alpha power in several cortical regions. We present evidence for direction-specific attention effects on alpha activity in occipital and parietal regions and demonstrate the sub-second timing of these effects in each region. The results support a mechanism for anticipatory attentional deployment that dynamically modulates the local alpha synchrony in a network of parietal control and occipital sensory regions.

[1]  Anthonio Teolis,et al.  Computational signal processing with wavelets , 1998, Applied and numerical harmonic analysis.

[2]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[3]  Dimitrios Pantazis,et al.  BrainStorm Electromagnetic Imaging Software , 2005 .

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention , 2001, Science.

[5]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[6]  R. Leahy,et al.  Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[7]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. , 2007, Trends in neurosciences.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[9]  G. Thut,et al.  Mechanisms of selective inhibition in visual spatial attention are indexed by α‐band EEG synchronization , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Increases in alpha oscillatory power reflect an active retinotopic mechanism for distracter suppression during sustained visuospatial attention. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[12]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .

[15]  Stefan J Kiebel,et al.  Parametric analysis of oscillatory activity as measured with EEG/MEG , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[17]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Task-based comparison of inverse methods in magnetoencephalography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  C M Gómez,et al.  Temporal evolution of alpha and beta bands during visual spatial attention. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  B Giesbrecht,et al.  Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  Joel R. Meyer,et al.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Anticipatory Biasing of Visuospatial Attention Indexed by Retinotopically Specific α-Bank Electroencephalography Increases over Occipital Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[23]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[24]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[25]  H. Abdi The General Linear Model , 2009 .

[26]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Imaging of oscillatory behavior in event-related MEG studies , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[27]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Jelena Kovacevic,et al.  Wavelets and Subband Coding , 2013, Prentice Hall Signal Processing Series.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[30]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[32]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  A shift of visual spatial attention is selectively associated with human EEG alpha activity , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  R M Leahy,et al.  A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Carlos M. Gómez,et al.  Temporal evolution of α and β bands during visual spatial attention , 2001 .

[36]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  EXPLORING HUMAN VISUAL ATTENTION IN AN MEG STUDY OF A SPATIAL CUEING PARADIGM USING A NOVEL ANCOVA DESIGN , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[37]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[39]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[40]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001 .

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Mechanisms of evoked and induced responses in MEG/EEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[42]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Spatiotemporal Localization of Significant Activation in MEG Using Permutation Tests , 2003, IPMI.

[43]  John W Belliveau,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[44]  C. Michel,et al.  Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[45]  E. Oja,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2013 .