Measuring Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: The Importance of Cognitive Consistency

Abstract A choice experiment eliciting environmental values with both real and hypothetical trade-offs is set up in order to test for hypothetical bias. A larger hypothetical bias was found in a between-subject than in a within-subject design, using otherwise identical scenarios, which can explain previous diverging results in the literature. We argue that people strive for consistency between their attitudes and behaviors, leading them to act in ways that correspond with their prior hypothetical statements. People hence seem to prefer to do what they say they would do, although this may not always reflect their true preferences regarding the good being valued.

[1]  John A. List,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value Non-Market Goods and Services: Evidence from Field Experiments , 2006 .

[2]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. , 1999 .

[3]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment , 2001 .

[4]  J. Lusk,et al.  Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness‐To‐Pay for Golden Rice , 2003 .

[5]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same? , 2002 .

[6]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Self-presentation by association. , 1989 .

[7]  A. Elliot,et al.  On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. , 1994 .

[8]  Joel Huber,et al.  A General Method for Constructing Efficient Choice Designs , 1996 .

[9]  L. Ross,et al.  The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology , 1991 .

[10]  Thomas V. Bonoma,et al.  Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? , 1971 .

[11]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: A Current Perspective1 , 1969 .

[12]  Uri Gneezy,et al.  Deception: The Role of Consequences , 2005 .

[13]  Chengyan Yue,et al.  Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias , 2010 .

[14]  J. Tirole,et al.  Incentives and Prosocial Behavior , 2005 .

[15]  F. Carlsson.  Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics? , 2010 .

[16]  Leeat Yariv.  I'll See it When I Believe it ? A Simple Model of Cognitive Consistency , 2002 .

[17]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks , 2004 .

[18]  John A. List,et al.  What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? , 2001 .

[19]  James J. Murphy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .

[20]  Joel Sobel,et al.  A Model of Positive Self-Image in Subjective Assessments , 2005 .

[21]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Are Women Less Selfish Than Men?: Evidence From Dictator Experiments , 1998 .

[22]  Aroldo Rodrígues,et al.  The theory of cognitive dissonance: a current perspective , 1970 .

[23]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[24]  Åsa Löfgren,et al.  Conformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods , 2010 .

[25]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .