Navigation by environmental geometry: the use of zebrafish as a model

SUMMARY Sensitivity to environmental shape in spatial navigation has been found, at both behavioural and neural levels, in virtually every species tested, starting early in development. Moreover, evidence that genetic deletions can cause selective deficits in such navigation behaviours suggests a genetic basis to navigation by environmental geometry. Nevertheless, the geometric computations underlying navigation have not been specified in any species. The present study teases apart the geometric components within the traditionally used rectangular enclosure and finds that zebrafish selectively represent distance and directional relationships between extended boundary surfaces. Similar behavioural results in geometric navigation tasks with human children provide prima facie evidence for similar underlying cognitive computations and open new doors for probing the genetic foundations that give rise to these computations.

[1]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: Young children’s use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task , 2012, Cognition.

[2]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The Importance of Proving the Null , 2022 .

[3]  K. Cheng.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[4]  E S Spelke,et al.  Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: a comparison with rats. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[6]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons , 1996, Nature.

[7]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Oxytocin/Vasopressin-Related Peptides Have an Ancient Role in Reproductive Behavior , 2012, Science.

[8]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Independent effects of geometry and landmark in a spontaneous reorientation task: a study of two species of fish , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[9]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The neuroscience of learning: beyond the Hebbian synapse. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  S. Guo,et al.  Linking genes to brain, behavior and neurological diseases: what can we learn from zebrafish? , 2004, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[12]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  M. Moser,et al.  Representation of Geometric Borders in the Entorhinal Cortex , 2008, Science.

[14]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Core systems of geometry in animal minds , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Core Knowledge and the Emergence of Symbols: The Case of Maps , 2015, Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society.

[16]  J. Dubnau,et al.  Gene discovery in Drosophila: new insights for learning and memory. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Spatial reorientation by geometry with freestanding objects and extended surfaces: a unifying view , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  View-based strategy for reorientation by geometry , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Boundary Vector Cells in the Subiculum of the Hippocampal Formation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[21]  I. Biederman,et al.  Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Children's use of geometry for reorientation. , 2008, Developmental science.

[23]  E. Spelke,et al.  Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space , 2001, Cognition.

[24]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Impaired geometric reorientation caused by genetic defect , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  K. Jeffery,et al.  The Boundary Vector Cell Model of Place Cell Firing and Spatial Memory , 2006, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[26]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Chicks, like children, spontaneously reorient by three-dimensional environmental geometry, not by image matching , 2012, Biology Letters.

[27]  J Ward-Robinson,et al.  Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[28]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Animals as Natural Geometers , 2009 .

[29]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  A modular geometric mechanism for reorientation in children , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  From natural geometry to spatial cognition , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[31]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[32]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Young Children Reorient by Computing Layout Geometry, Not by Matching Images of the Environment , 2010 .

[33]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.